[jira] Created: (GEOT-2762) Renderer should be consistent in how AffineTransform is handled with vector and raster layers

1 message Options
Embed this post
Permalink
JIRA jira@codehaus.org

[jira] Created: (GEOT-2762) Renderer should be consistent in how AffineTransform is handled with vector and raster layers

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Renderer should be consistent in how AffineTransform is handled with vector and raster layers
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: GEOT-2762
                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2762
             Project: GeoTools
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: core render
    Affects Versions: 2.6-M0
            Reporter: Michael Bedward
            Assignee: Michael Bedward


This issue supercedes GEOT-2714.  I'm creating to record my thoughts before I forget them :)

This method signature...
GTRenderer.paint( Graphics2D graphics, Rectangle paintArea, ReferencedEnvelope mapArea, AffineTransform worldToScreen )

...implies that an AffineTransform created by client code will be used by the renderer. The javadocs state this explicitly:
{quote}
         Renders features based on the map layers and their styles as specified in
         the map context using <code>setContext</code>. <p/> This version of
         the method assumes that paint area, enelope and worldToScreen transform
         are already computed and in sync. Use this method to avoid recomputation.
{quote}

However, vector map layers are treated differently to raster map layers. For vector layers, a transform supplied by the client will be used. For raster layers, the transform is _only_ used if it specifies rotation, otherwise it is sliently ignored and a default transform is calculated with GridEnvelopeMapper.

I think it would be preferable to make the treatment of a client-supplied AffineTransform consistent by having GridCoverageRenderer honour the transform whenever it is non-null.

Andrea has pointed out that there are no tests for such a change that that comparing rendering results to reference images is hard because of sensitivity to different JDK / platform combinations.  

There may also be issues of backwards compatibility for clients that (perhaps unknowingly) depend on the current behaviour.

On the other hand, issues such as CRS axis definition applies equally to both vector and raster layers so it seems odd to treat them differently.


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel