collective.solr?

[Vincenzo Di Somma]

On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:49 +0100, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> I think the namespace discussion is out of date with eggs, since a
> company that creates an egg can use the collective namespace, and
> still has its name in the author field.

You are right in theory but, to me, it seems the effect the egg-based
products are producing is going in the opposite direction.
Should the plone community define/agree on a policy about eggs
namespaces ?


                        vds


--
Vincenzo Di Somma               [hidden email]
Reflab S.r.l. - Design, Development and Consulting
Phone: [phone]        http://www.reflab.com




_______________________________________________
Enterprise mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/enterprise

[Tarek Ziadé]

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Vincenzo Di Somma <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:49 +0100, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> I think the namespace discussion is out of date with eggs, since a
> company that creates an egg can use the collective namespace, and
> still has its name in the author field.

You are right in theory but, to me, it seems the effect the egg-based
products are producing is going in the opposite direction.
Should the plone community define/agree on a policy about eggs
namespaces ?

Agreed, that would be better.

My opinion is :

- the plone.* should be owned by the PSF and the plone core;

- the collective.* should be also owned by the PSF, together with the initial author,
which remains its release manager and maintainer. Then he can decide whether
he gives the same rigths to other folks he trusts in the community.


++
Tarek

--
Tarek Ziadé | Association AfPy | www.afpy.org
Blog FR | http://programmation-python.org
Blog EN | http://tarekziade.wordpress.com/
_______________________________________________
Enterprise mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/enterprise