WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results

[Jeff McKenna]

For those that did not make it to Sydney, here is the WMS Performance
Shootout presentation with results (GeoServer vs MapServer):

http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout

Power users who manage MapServer sites with high loads/map draws should
take note of the results of MapServer CGI vs MapServer FastCGI, even in
the case of Shapefiles and Rasters (yes, quite surprising).

-jeff


--
Jeff McKenna
FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services
http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/






_______________________________________________
mapserver-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

[Steve Lime]

Jeff, many, many thanks to you and all the folks working from both projects on the benchmarking
exercise. Sounds like the presentation was very successful and MapServer made a very respectable
showing. Congrats!

Steve

>>> On 10/23/2009 at 6:21 PM, in message <[hidden email]>,
Jeff McKenna <[hidden email]> wrote:

> For those that did not make it to Sydney, here is the WMS Performance
> Shootout presentation with results (GeoServer vs MapServer):
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout 
>
> Power users who manage MapServer sites with high loads/map draws should
> take note of the results of MapServer CGI vs MapServer FastCGI, even in
> the case of Shapefiles and Rasters (yes, quite surprising).
>
> -jeff
>

_______________________________________________
mapserver-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

[Dan Little]

Not to be an ass, but wasn't ESRI coming to play?


----- Original Message ----

> From: Jeff McKenna <[hidden email]>
> To: MapServer <[hidden email]>; MapServer Dev Mailing List <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Fri, October 23, 2009 6:21:14 PM
> Subject: [mapserver-dev] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
>
> For those that did not make it to Sydney, here is the WMS Performance Shootout
> presentation with results (GeoServer vs MapServer):
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout
>
> Power users who manage MapServer sites with high loads/map draws should take
> note of the results of MapServer CGI vs MapServer FastCGI, even in the case of
> Shapefiles and Rasters (yes, quite surprising).
>
> -jeff
>
>
> -- Jeff McKenna
> FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services
> http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

     
_______________________________________________
mapserver-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

[Steve Lime]

They were but lacked the time and resources to properly participate and in the end pulled
out. I've not seen evidence of anything to the contrary...

Steve

>>> On 10/27/2009 at 10:14 AM, in message
<[hidden email]>, Dan Little <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Not to be an ass, but wasn't ESRI coming to play?
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Jeff McKenna <[hidden email]>
>> To: MapServer <[hidden email]>; MapServer Dev Mailing List
> <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Fri, October 23, 2009 6:21:14 PM
>> Subject: [mapserver-dev] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
>>
>> For those that did not make it to Sydney, here is the WMS Performance
> Shootout
>> presentation with results (GeoServer vs MapServer):
>>
>> http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout 
>>
>> Power users who manage MapServer sites with high loads/map draws should take
>
>> note of the results of MapServer CGI vs MapServer FastCGI, even in the case
> of
>> Shapefiles and Rasters (yes, quite surprising).
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>>
>> -- Jeff McKenna
>> FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services
>> http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapserver-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev 
>
>
>
>      
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

_______________________________________________
mapserver-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

[Dan Little]

Cool, I was not privy.  Too bad, I wanted to see the results.


----- Original Message ----

> From: Steve Lime <[hidden email]>
> To: Jeff McKenna <[hidden email]>; MapServer Dev Mailing List <[hidden email]>; Dan Little <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 10:22:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [mapserver-dev] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
>
> They were but lacked the time and resources to properly participate and in the
> end pulled
> out. I've not seen evidence of anything to the contrary...
>
> Steve
>
> >>> On 10/27/2009 at 10:14 AM, in message
> <[hidden email]>, Dan Little
> wrote:
> > Not to be an ass, but wasn't ESRI coming to play?
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Jeff McKenna
> >> To: MapServer ; MapServer Dev Mailing List
> >
> >> Sent: Fri, October 23, 2009 6:21:14 PM
> >> Subject: [mapserver-dev] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
> >>
> >> For those that did not make it to Sydney, here is the WMS Performance
> > Shootout
> >> presentation with results (GeoServer vs MapServer):
> >>
> >> http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout 
> >>
> >> Power users who manage MapServer sites with high loads/map draws should take
> >
> >> note of the results of MapServer CGI vs MapServer FastCGI, even in the case
> > of
> >> Shapefiles and Rasters (yes, quite surprising).
> >>
> >> -jeff
> >>
> >>
> >> -- Jeff McKenna
> >> FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services
> >> http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ 
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mapserver-dev mailing list
> >> [hidden email]
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev 
> >
> >
> >
> >      
> > _______________________________________________
> > mapserver-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

     
_______________________________________________
mapserver-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

[Steve Lime]

Lot's of folks did. I don't believe there were even preliminary tests results for ArcServer. I don't
know if folks from the different projects had access to test numbers for the other projects or
not. At least ESRI gave it a shot. MapServer and GeoServer had a leg up simply because they
had been through this before.

- Steve

>>> On 10/27/2009 at 10:25 AM, in message
<[hidden email]>, Dan Little <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Cool, I was not privy.  Too bad, I wanted to see the results.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Steve Lime <[hidden email]>
>> To: Jeff McKenna <[hidden email]>; MapServer Dev Mailing List
> <[hidden email]>; Dan Little <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 10:22:34 AM
>> Subject: Re: [mapserver-dev] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
>>
>> They were but lacked the time and resources to properly participate and in
> the
>> end pulled
>> out. I've not seen evidence of anything to the contrary...
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> >>> On 10/27/2009 at 10:14 AM, in message
>> <[hidden email]>, Dan Little
>> wrote:
>> > Not to be an ass, but wasn't ESRI coming to play?
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----
>> >> From: Jeff McKenna
>> >> To: MapServer ; MapServer Dev Mailing List
>> >
>> >> Sent: Fri, October 23, 2009 6:21:14 PM
>> >> Subject: [mapserver-dev] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
>> >>
>> >> For those that did not make it to Sydney, here is the WMS Performance
>> > Shootout
>> >> presentation with results (GeoServer vs MapServer):
>> >>
>> >> http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout 
>> >>
>> >> Power users who manage MapServer sites with high loads/map draws should
> take
>> >
>> >> note of the results of MapServer CGI vs MapServer FastCGI, even in the case
>
>> > of
>> >> Shapefiles and Rasters (yes, quite surprising).
>> >>
>> >> -jeff
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -- Jeff McKenna
>> >> FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services
>> >> http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ 
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> mapserver-dev mailing list
>> >> [hidden email]
>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev 
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >      
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > mapserver-dev mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev 
>
>
>
>      
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

_______________________________________________
mapserver-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

[Paul Ramsey]

There still seems to be lots of enthusiasm on their part to try again
next year. It falls to us to get the test data and test plan in place
a lot earlier next time around.

P

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Dan Little <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Cool, I was not privy.  Too bad, I wanted to see the results.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Steve Lime <[hidden email]>
>> To: Jeff McKenna <[hidden email]>; MapServer Dev Mailing List <[hidden email]>; Dan Little <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 10:22:34 AM
>> Subject: Re: [mapserver-dev] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
>>
>> They were but lacked the time and resources to properly participate and in the
>> end pulled
>> out. I've not seen evidence of anything to the contrary...
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> >>> On 10/27/2009 at 10:14 AM, in message
>> <[hidden email]>, Dan Little
>> wrote:
>> > Not to be an ass, but wasn't ESRI coming to play?
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----
>> >> From: Jeff McKenna
>> >> To: MapServer ; MapServer Dev Mailing List
>> >
>> >> Sent: Fri, October 23, 2009 6:21:14 PM
>> >> Subject: [mapserver-dev] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
>> >>
>> >> For those that did not make it to Sydney, here is the WMS Performance
>> > Shootout
>> >> presentation with results (GeoServer vs MapServer):
>> >>
>> >> http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout
>> >>
>> >> Power users who manage MapServer sites with high loads/map draws should take
>> >
>> >> note of the results of MapServer CGI vs MapServer FastCGI, even in the case
>> > of
>> >> Shapefiles and Rasters (yes, quite surprising).
>> >>
>> >> -jeff
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -- Jeff McKenna
>> >> FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services
>> >> http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> mapserver-dev mailing list
>> >> [hidden email]
>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > mapserver-dev mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>

_______________________________________________
mapserver-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev