[VOTE] Don't release 2.1M1 and instead replace 2.1M2 with 2.1M1

[vmassol]

Hi,

We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial  
roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a  
consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases.

Namely there are 11 issues and most of them are not very important  
(see http://tinycoke.com/_6rvPPs9pSbA/picture_1.png) and don't warrant  
a release IMO.

I'm proposing to remove 2.1M2 and extend 2.1M1 till 16 Nov (ie the  
date when 2.1M2 was supposed to be released). The other dates are kept  
unchanged, see
http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Roadmap

Here's my +1

Thanks
-Vincent



_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

[tmortagne]

+1

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 18:22, Vincent Massol <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial
> roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a
> consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases.
>
> Namely there are 11 issues and most of them are not very important
> (see http://tinycoke.com/_6rvPPs9pSbA/picture_1.png) and don't warrant
> a release IMO.
>
> I'm proposing to remove 2.1M2 and extend 2.1M1 till 16 Nov (ie the
> date when 2.1M2 was supposed to be released). The other dates are kept
> unchanged, see
> http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Roadmap
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>

--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

[Jean-Vincent Drean-3]

+1,

JV.

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Vincent Massol <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial
> roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a
> consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases.
>
> Namely there are 11 issues and most of them are not very important
> (see http://tinycoke.com/_6rvPPs9pSbA/picture_1.png) and don't warrant
> a release IMO.
>
> I'm proposing to remove 2.1M2 and extend 2.1M1 till 16 Nov (ie the
> date when 2.1M2 was supposed to be released). The other dates are kept
> unchanged, see
> http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Roadmap
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

[Marius Dumitru Florea]

+1

Thanks,
Marius

Vincent Massol wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial  
> roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a  
> consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases.
>
> Namely there are 11 issues and most of them are not very important  
> (see http://tinycoke.com/_6rvPPs9pSbA/picture_1.png) and don't warrant  
> a release IMO.
>
> I'm proposing to remove 2.1M2 and extend 2.1M1 till 16 Nov (ie the  
> date when 2.1M2 was supposed to be released). The other dates are kept  
> unchanged, see
> http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Roadmap
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

[vmassol]

Vote passed, I have changed the dates in jira.

Thanks
-Vincent

On Oct 27, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial  
> roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a  
> consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases.
>
> Namely there are 11 issues and most of them are not very important  
> (see http://tinycoke.com/_6rvPPs9pSbA/picture_1.png) and don't  
> warrant a release IMO.
>
> I'm proposing to remove 2.1M2 and extend 2.1M1 till 16 Nov (ie the  
> date when 2.1M2 was supposed to be released). The other dates are  
> kept unchanged, see
> http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Roadmap
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs