[VOTE] Add an URL parameters to choose the renderer to use when viewing a page (was Re: [PROPOSAL] Use plain text renderer with ?xpage=plain)
|
|
tmortagne
|
Hi devs,
We need to decide something for http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3413 I propose to take Vincent's proposal and have a parameter "outputType" in the URL which provide the syntax identifier of the renderer to use. Also since syntax identifier contains "/" which i never remember the escaped version when i need it i propose to support short names by looking at available renderers and take the last version of the asked syntax (which mean the only renderer of this syntax most of the time anyway but I prefer having something in case of). So for example you could ask for the page Space.Page printed as plain text and without UI with the URL: http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain&xpage=plain or the full form http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain%2F1.0&xpage=plain I don't like xpage=plain but it already exists and is doing exactly this, printing the content of the document without UI. We can decide latter if we want a new parameter for this. Feel free to propose another name, I'm not sure of "outputType" but i could not find a better one and "renderer" seems too technical. On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 13:15, Vincent Massol<[hidden email]> wrote: > > On May 4, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote: > >> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> In 2.0 architecture we have no way currently to print a strongly >>> formatted text (like JSON) or simply a plain text without XHTML which >>> we are doing generally using xpage=plain in XWiki 1.0 >> >> With the 1.0 syntax xpage=plain was mainly used to: >> 1/ Output data in special format (JSON, xls, etc). In those cases >> {pre} was used to avoid xhtml transformations. >> 2/ Output xhtml content without the XWiki UI, I can think of one use >> case where this content was put in ajax tooltips. >> >> Is 2/ covered ? Do we need a xpage=xhtml for it ? >> Note that xpage=xpart&vm=contentview.vm can be used as a workaround. > > If you we want to have something clean for the future it seems to me > that having a parameter called outputType (or simply output, or type, > or contentType) which can take all renderer values would be best. > > For ex outputType=xhtml, xwiki, text, pdf, rtf, etc > > And when not specified it would default to outputType=xhtml. > > For removing the UI I'd use another parameter since it's orthogonal. > Something like showUI=true|false > > Thanks > -Vincent > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > Thanks, -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs |
||||||||||||||||
vmassol
|
On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > Hi devs, > > We need to decide something for http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3413 > > I propose to take Vincent's proposal and have a parameter "outputType" > in the URL which provide the syntax identifier of the renderer to use. > > Also since syntax identifier contains "/" which i never remember the > escaped version when i need it i propose to support short names by > looking at available renderers and take the last version of the asked > syntax (which mean the only renderer of this syntax most of the time > anyway but I prefer having something in case of). > > So for example you could ask for the page Space.Page printed as plain > text and without UI with the URL: > > http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain&xpage=plain > > or the full form > > http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain%2F1.0&xpage=plain > > I don't like xpage=plain but it already exists and is doing exactly > this, printing the content of the document without UI. We can decide > latter if we want a new parameter for this. > > Feel free to propose another name, I'm not sure of "outputType" but i > could not find a better one and "renderer" seems too technical. +1 for short name. We could also have an optional outputVersion rather than the full name with the "/". I'd prefer this it separates more clearly the namespaces and there's no need for special parsing (it would work with a syntax which has a "/" in its name for example). +1 in general. Thanks -Vincent > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 13:15, Vincent Massol<[hidden email]> > wrote: >> >> On May 4, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne >>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> Hi devs, >>>> >>>> In 2.0 architecture we have no way currently to print a strongly >>>> formatted text (like JSON) or simply a plain text without XHTML >>>> which >>>> we are doing generally using xpage=plain in XWiki 1.0 >>> >>> With the 1.0 syntax xpage=plain was mainly used to: >>> 1/ Output data in special format (JSON, xls, etc). In those cases >>> {pre} was used to avoid xhtml transformations. >>> 2/ Output xhtml content without the XWiki UI, I can think of one use >>> case where this content was put in ajax tooltips. >>> >>> Is 2/ covered ? Do we need a xpage=xhtml for it ? >>> Note that xpage=xpart&vm=contentview.vm can be used as a workaround. >> >> If you we want to have something clean for the future it seems to me >> that having a parameter called outputType (or simply output, or type, >> or contentType) which can take all renderer values would be best. >> >> For ex outputType=xhtml, xwiki, text, pdf, rtf, etc >> >> And when not specified it would default to outputType=xhtml. >> >> For removing the UI I'd use another parameter since it's orthogonal. >> Something like showUI=true|false >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs |
||||||||||||||||
Marius Dumitru Florea
|
Vincent Massol wrote: > On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > >> Hi devs, >> >> We need to decide something for http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3413 >> >> I propose to take Vincent's proposal and have a parameter "outputType" >> in the URL which provide the syntax identifier of the renderer to use. >> >> Also since syntax identifier contains "/" which i never remember the >> escaped version when i need it i propose to support short names by >> looking at available renderers and take the last version of the asked >> syntax (which mean the only renderer of this syntax most of the time >> anyway but I prefer having something in case of). >> >> So for example you could ask for the page Space.Page printed as plain >> text and without UI with the URL: >> >> http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain&xpage=plain >> >> or the full form >> >> http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain%2F1.0&xpage=plain >> >> I don't like xpage=plain but it already exists and is doing exactly >> this, printing the content of the document without UI. We can decide >> latter if we want a new parameter for this. >> >> Feel free to propose another name, I'm not sure of "outputType" but i >> could not find a better one and "renderer" seems too technical. > > +1 for short name. We could also have an optional outputVersion rather > than the full name with the "/". I'd prefer this it separates more > clearly the namespaces and there's no need for special parsing (it > would work with a syntax which has a "/" in its name for example). Why not simply "syntax" instead of "outputType"? "type" is too generic IMO. "syntax" is more like "language" but for applications. I have a resource (Space.Page) and I'd like to access a representation of this resource in a specific syntax known by my client application: Space/Page?syntax=pdf I agree with Vincent that a separate, optional, parameter for the syntax version is better. > > +1 in general. +1 in general too. Thanks, Marius > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 13:15, Vincent Massol<[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>> On May 4, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne >>>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> Hi devs, >>>>> >>>>> In 2.0 architecture we have no way currently to print a strongly >>>>> formatted text (like JSON) or simply a plain text without XHTML >>>>> which >>>>> we are doing generally using xpage=plain in XWiki 1.0 >>>> With the 1.0 syntax xpage=plain was mainly used to: >>>> 1/ Output data in special format (JSON, xls, etc). In those cases >>>> {pre} was used to avoid xhtml transformations. >>>> 2/ Output xhtml content without the XWiki UI, I can think of one use >>>> case where this content was put in ajax tooltips. >>>> >>>> Is 2/ covered ? Do we need a xpage=xhtml for it ? >>>> Note that xpage=xpart&vm=contentview.vm can be used as a workaround. >>> If you we want to have something clean for the future it seems to me >>> that having a parameter called outputType (or simply output, or type, >>> or contentType) which can take all renderer values would be best. >>> >>> For ex outputType=xhtml, xwiki, text, pdf, rtf, etc >>> >>> And when not specified it would default to outputType=xhtml. >>> >>> For removing the UI I'd use another parameter since it's orthogonal. >>> Something like showUI=true|false >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs devs mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs |
||||||||||||||||
|
vmassol
|
On Jun 29, 2009, at 10:28 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > > > Vincent Massol wrote: >> On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> We need to decide something for http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3413 >>> >>> I propose to take Vincent's proposal and have a parameter >>> "outputType" >>> in the URL which provide the syntax identifier of the renderer to >>> use. >>> >>> Also since syntax identifier contains "/" which i never remember the >>> escaped version when i need it i propose to support short names by >>> looking at available renderers and take the last version of the >>> asked >>> syntax (which mean the only renderer of this syntax most of the time >>> anyway but I prefer having something in case of). >>> >>> So for example you could ask for the page Space.Page printed as >>> plain >>> text and without UI with the URL: >>> >>> http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain&xpage=plain >>> >>> or the full form >>> >>> http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain%2F1.0&xpage=plain >>> >>> I don't like xpage=plain but it already exists and is doing exactly >>> this, printing the content of the document without UI. We can decide >>> latter if we want a new parameter for this. >>> >>> Feel free to propose another name, I'm not sure of "outputType" >>> but i >>> could not find a better one and "renderer" seems too technical. >> >> +1 for short name. We could also have an optional outputVersion >> rather >> than the full name with the "/". I'd prefer this it separates more >> clearly the namespaces and there's no need for special parsing (it >> would work with a syntax which has a "/" in its name for example). > > Why not simply "syntax" instead of "outputType"? "type" is too generic > IMO. "syntax" is more like "language" but for applications. I have a > resource (Space.Page) and I'd like to access a representation of this > resource in a specific syntax known by my client application: > Space/Page?syntax=pdf I like "syntax" even though we don't know what syntax we're talking about. +1 from me for either outputSyntax (removes the ambiguity) or simply syntax (keeps the ambiguity but maybe ok). > I agree with Vincent that a separate, optional, parameter for the > syntax > version is better. I'd then propose syntaxVersion (if we use syntax) or outputSyntaxVersion (if we use outputSyntax) since version alone is probably not specific enough and could be used for other things in other contexts. Thanks -Vincent > >> >> +1 in general. > > +1 in general too. > > Thanks, > Marius > >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 13:15, Vincent Massol<[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>>> On May 4, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne >>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>> >>>>>> In 2.0 architecture we have no way currently to print a strongly >>>>>> formatted text (like JSON) or simply a plain text without XHTML >>>>>> which >>>>>> we are doing generally using xpage=plain in XWiki 1.0 >>>>> With the 1.0 syntax xpage=plain was mainly used to: >>>>> 1/ Output data in special format (JSON, xls, etc). In those cases >>>>> {pre} was used to avoid xhtml transformations. >>>>> 2/ Output xhtml content without the XWiki UI, I can think of one >>>>> use >>>>> case where this content was put in ajax tooltips. >>>>> >>>>> Is 2/ covered ? Do we need a xpage=xhtml for it ? >>>>> Note that xpage=xpart&vm=contentview.vm can be used as a >>>>> workaround. >>>> If you we want to have something clean for the future it seems to >>>> me >>>> that having a parameter called outputType (or simply output, or >>>> type, >>>> or contentType) which can take all renderer values would be best. >>>> >>>> For ex outputType=xhtml, xwiki, text, pdf, rtf, etc >>>> >>>> And when not specified it would default to outputType=xhtml. >>>> >>>> For removing the UI I'd use another parameter since it's >>>> orthogonal. >>>> Something like showUI=true|false >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Vincent devs mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs |
||||||||||||||||
|
tmortagne
|
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 22:33, Vincent Massol<[hidden email]> wrote:
> > On Jun 29, 2009, at 10:28 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > >> >> >> Vincent Massol wrote: >>> On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >>> >>>> Hi devs, >>>> >>>> We need to decide something for http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3413 >>>> >>>> I propose to take Vincent's proposal and have a parameter >>>> "outputType" >>>> in the URL which provide the syntax identifier of the renderer to >>>> use. >>>> >>>> Also since syntax identifier contains "/" which i never remember the >>>> escaped version when i need it i propose to support short names by >>>> looking at available renderers and take the last version of the >>>> asked >>>> syntax (which mean the only renderer of this syntax most of the time >>>> anyway but I prefer having something in case of). >>>> >>>> So for example you could ask for the page Space.Page printed as >>>> plain >>>> text and without UI with the URL: >>>> >>>> http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain&xpage=plain >>>> >>>> or the full form >>>> >>>> http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain%2F1.0&xpage=plain >>>> >>>> I don't like xpage=plain but it already exists and is doing exactly >>>> this, printing the content of the document without UI. We can decide >>>> latter if we want a new parameter for this. >>>> >>>> Feel free to propose another name, I'm not sure of "outputType" >>>> but i >>>> could not find a better one and "renderer" seems too technical. >>> >>> +1 for short name. We could also have an optional outputVersion >>> rather >>> than the full name with the "/". I'd prefer this it separates more >>> clearly the namespaces and there's no need for special parsing (it >>> would work with a syntax which has a "/" in its name for example). >> >> Why not simply "syntax" instead of "outputType"? "type" is too generic >> IMO. "syntax" is more like "language" but for applications. I have a >> resource (Space.Page) and I'd like to access a representation of this >> resource in a specific syntax known by my client application: >> Space/Page?syntax=pdf > > I like "syntax" even though we don't know what syntax we're talking > about. +1 from me for either outputSyntax (removes the ambiguity) or > simply syntax (keeps the ambiguity but maybe ok). > >> I agree with Vincent that a separate, optional, parameter for the >> syntax >> version is better. > > I'd then propose syntaxVersion (if we use syntax) or > outputSyntaxVersion (if we use outputSyntax) since version alone is > probably not specific enough and could be used for other things in > other contexts. "syntax" is short and nice (and yes better than "type") as parameter but it does not say enough it's about the output, it could be used for lots of things. So +1 for outputSyntax and outputSyntaxVersion > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> >>> >>> +1 in general. >> >> +1 in general too. >> >> Thanks, >> Marius >> >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >>> >>>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 13:15, Vincent Massol<[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On May 4, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne >>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In 2.0 architecture we have no way currently to print a strongly >>>>>>> formatted text (like JSON) or simply a plain text without XHTML >>>>>>> which >>>>>>> we are doing generally using xpage=plain in XWiki 1.0 >>>>>> With the 1.0 syntax xpage=plain was mainly used to: >>>>>> 1/ Output data in special format (JSON, xls, etc). In those cases >>>>>> {pre} was used to avoid xhtml transformations. >>>>>> 2/ Output xhtml content without the XWiki UI, I can think of one >>>>>> use >>>>>> case where this content was put in ajax tooltips. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is 2/ covered ? Do we need a xpage=xhtml for it ? >>>>>> Note that xpage=xpart&vm=contentview.vm can be used as a >>>>>> workaround. >>>>> If you we want to have something clean for the future it seems to >>>>> me >>>>> that having a parameter called outputType (or simply output, or >>>>> type, >>>>> or contentType) which can take all renderer values would be best. >>>>> >>>>> For ex outputType=xhtml, xwiki, text, pdf, rtf, etc >>>>> >>>>> And when not specified it would default to outputType=xhtml. >>>>> >>>>> For removing the UI I'd use another parameter since it's >>>>> orthogonal. >>>>> Something like showUI=true|false >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> -Vincent > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs |
||||||||||||||||
|
Marius Dumitru Florea
|
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 22:33, Vincent Massol<[hidden email]> wrote: >> On Jun 29, 2009, at 10:28 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: >> >>> >>> Vincent Massol wrote: >>>> On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi devs, >>>>> >>>>> We need to decide something for http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3413 >>>>> >>>>> I propose to take Vincent's proposal and have a parameter >>>>> "outputType" >>>>> in the URL which provide the syntax identifier of the renderer to >>>>> use. >>>>> >>>>> Also since syntax identifier contains "/" which i never remember the >>>>> escaped version when i need it i propose to support short names by >>>>> looking at available renderers and take the last version of the >>>>> asked >>>>> syntax (which mean the only renderer of this syntax most of the time >>>>> anyway but I prefer having something in case of). >>>>> >>>>> So for example you could ask for the page Space.Page printed as >>>>> plain >>>>> text and without UI with the URL: >>>>> >>>>> http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain&xpage=plain >>>>> >>>>> or the full form >>>>> >>>>> http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain%2F1.0&xpage=plain >>>>> >>>>> I don't like xpage=plain but it already exists and is doing exactly >>>>> this, printing the content of the document without UI. We can decide >>>>> latter if we want a new parameter for this. >>>>> >>>>> Feel free to propose another name, I'm not sure of "outputType" >>>>> but i >>>>> could not find a better one and "renderer" seems too technical. >>>> +1 for short name. We could also have an optional outputVersion >>>> rather >>>> than the full name with the "/". I'd prefer this it separates more >>>> clearly the namespaces and there's no need for special parsing (it >>>> would work with a syntax which has a "/" in its name for example). >>> Why not simply "syntax" instead of "outputType"? "type" is too generic >>> IMO. "syntax" is more like "language" but for applications. I have a >>> resource (Space.Page) and I'd like to access a representation of this >>> resource in a specific syntax known by my client application: >>> Space/Page?syntax=pdf >> I like "syntax" even though we don't know what syntax we're talking >> about. +1 from me for either outputSyntax (removes the ambiguity) or >> simply syntax (keeps the ambiguity but maybe ok). >> >>> I agree with Vincent that a separate, optional, parameter for the >>> syntax >>> version is better. >> I'd then propose syntaxVersion (if we use syntax) or >> outputSyntaxVersion (if we use outputSyntax) since version alone is >> probably not specific enough and could be used for other things in >> other contexts. > > "syntax" is short and nice (and yes better than "type") as parameter > but it does not say enough it's about the output, it could be used for > lots of things. > > So +1 for outputSyntax and outputSyntaxVersion +1 too. Thanks, Marius > >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >>>> +1 in general. >>> +1 in general too. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Marius >>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Vincent >>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 13:15, Vincent Massol<[hidden email]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On May 4, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne >>>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In 2.0 architecture we have no way currently to print a strongly >>>>>>>> formatted text (like JSON) or simply a plain text without XHTML >>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>> we are doing generally using xpage=plain in XWiki 1.0 >>>>>>> With the 1.0 syntax xpage=plain was mainly used to: >>>>>>> 1/ Output data in special format (JSON, xls, etc). In those cases >>>>>>> {pre} was used to avoid xhtml transformations. >>>>>>> 2/ Output xhtml content without the XWiki UI, I can think of one >>>>>>> use >>>>>>> case where this content was put in ajax tooltips. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is 2/ covered ? Do we need a xpage=xhtml for it ? >>>>>>> Note that xpage=xpart&vm=contentview.vm can be used as a >>>>>>> workaround. >>>>>> If you we want to have something clean for the future it seems to >>>>>> me >>>>>> that having a parameter called outputType (or simply output, or >>>>>> type, >>>>>> or contentType) which can take all renderer values would be best. >>>>>> >>>>>> For ex outputType=xhtml, xwiki, text, pdf, rtf, etc >>>>>> >>>>>> And when not specified it would default to outputType=xhtml. >>>>>> >>>>>> For removing the UI I'd use another parameter since it's >>>>>> orthogonal. >>>>>> Something like showUI=true|false >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> -Vincent >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > > > devs mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs |
||||||||||||||||
| Free Embeddable Forum Powered by Nabble | Help |
