Dave,
I still see some of the CPE technologies follow 2.0 style –
<cpe-item deprecated="true" deprecation_date="2008-04-15T12:35:00.000-04:00" name="cpe:/o:microsoft:windows-nt:vista::business">
<title xml:lang="en-US">Microsoft Windows Vista any business</title>
<meta:item-metadata modification-date="2008-04-15T19:57:00.663-04:00" status="FINAL"
nvd-id="74545" />
</cpe-item>
<cpe-item deprecated="true"
deprecation_date="2008-04-15T12:35:00.000-04:00" name="cpe:/o:microsoft:windows-nt:vista::enterprise">
<title xml:lang="en-US">Microsoft Windows Vista any enterprise</title>
<meta:item-metadata modification-date="2008-04-15T19:57:19.167-04:00" status="FINAL"
nvd-id="74546" />
</cpe-item>
<cpe-item deprecated="true"
deprecation_date="2008-04-15T12:35:00.000-04:00" name="cpe:/o:microsoft:windows-nt:vista::home_basic">
<title xml:lang="en-US">Microsoft Windows Vista any home_basic</title>
<meta:item-metadata modification-date="2008-04-15T19:57:19.290-04:00" status="FINAL"
nvd-id="74542" />
</cpe-item>
<cpe-item deprecated="true"
deprecation_date="2008-04-15T12:35:00.000-04:00" name="cpe:/o:microsoft:windows-nt:vista::home_premium">
<title xml:lang="en-US">Microsoft Windows Vista any home_premium</title>
<meta:item-metadata modification-date="2008-04-15T19:57:22.573-04:00" status="FINAL"
nvd-id="74543" />
</cpe-item>
<cpe-item deprecated="true"
deprecation_date="2008-04-15T12:35:00.000-04:00" name="cpe:/o:microsoft:windows-nt:vista::starter">
<title xml:lang="en-US">Microsoft Windows Vista any starter</title>
<meta:item-metadata modification-date="2008-04-15T19:57:06.417-04:00" status="FINAL"
nvd-id="74541" />
</cpe-item>
<cpe-item deprecated="true"
deprecation_date="2008-04-15T12:35:00.000-04:00" name="cpe:/o:microsoft:windows-nt:vista::ultimate">
<title xml:lang="en-US">Microsoft Windows Vista any ultimate</title>
<meta:item-metadata modification-date="2008-04-15T19:57:23.917-04:00" status="FINAL" nvd-id="74544" />
</cpe-item>
The attribute deprecated is set to true in these cases. Does
this mean the cpe-item is deprecated? If not, I do not see the deprecated_by
attribute.
Respectfully.
Sudhir
-----Original Message-----
From: David Waltermire [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:07 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [CPE-DISCUSSION-LIST] Updated CPE Dictionary Posted
CPE Community Members,
I am pleased to announce the availability of an updated Official CPE
dictionary
for CPE version 2.1. I would like to express my gratitude to all the
vendors,
contributors, analysts and developers that have contributed to this
effort.
This dictionary contains data for over 15,000 CPEs from 250+
vendors. Starting
with this release we plan to produce regular monthly updates to the
Official CPE
dictionary expanding on this content based on community feedback and
vendor/3rd
party contributions.
You can download the dictionary using the following URL:
http://nvd.nist.gov/cpe.cfm
Please note that we are providing additional CPE repository metadata
using the
NVD CPE Metadata schema. This metadata includes: status,
identification and
modification information from the official CPE dictionary
repository. CPEs
included in this dictionary have one of two status values:
FINAL - The CPE has been accepted into the official dictionary.
DRAFT - A CPE that is currently undergoing CPE moderation and review by
the
community. Draft CPEs will be made FINAL after a 30 day community
review period.
For more information on the CPE dictionary please refer to:
The CPE homepage - http://cpe.mitre.org
The Official CPE Dictionary - http://nvd.nist.gov/cpe.cfm
I look forward to your comments and questions.
David Waltermire
NVD/SCAP Team Lead
http://nvd.nist.gov
O: 301-975-8441