Don, I agree with you. I think now that the GOP has suffered such large losses (unsurprisingly) it is important for the right to re-unify; however, it seems unreasonable for us to expect all on the right to see eye to eye on every single issue. Lately many in the media and some of the political pundits have been pushing for the emergence of reformers in the GOP. Reform is a nice word, but what exactly does this entail? I’m afraid that some (even some conservatives) are pushing for either a purge of the religious right or the fiscal conservatives/small government conservatives. I believe, just as you, that if we are to have a successful “reformation,” then we will need to bring together the social conservatives and the libertarian leaning conservatives. Jonah Goldberg makes a strong argument for this in his NRO article:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MjRlMDEyZDcyYTNlODliYmRhZWRkNjc2OGE2YjViOWI= . It could serve the right well to agree to disagree and yet unite on the issues that they do stand together on. For example, Ron Paul seems to have no “street cred.” as a member of the conservative movement; however, he is a strong supporter of many things that all conservatives value (life, the Constitution, efficient government, etc). Instead of throwing him to the curb, why doesn’t the right use someone like him and his movement to their benefit? Instead of pretending that all conservatives follow the call of the GOP, the conservative movement should respectfully make their arguments to one another when they disagree and unite on the issues that conservatives value.