MuseScore Developer

Setting file associations for Windows

32 messages

1 2

wschweer

Re: Setting file associations for Windows

Reply Threaded

On my todo list is to learn more about D-Bus which promises to be a more
generic solution to such kind of problems and i would like to postpone the
decision on how to proceed.

On Sunday 10 May 2009 12:52:33 Lasconic wrote:

> I took a closer look. There are a handful of files to be added. I
> don't want to crash the build system or mess musescore startup.
> So I pass for the moment. Werner maybe? :)
>
> 2009/5/10 Lasconic <[hidden email]>:
> > Here is the Qt way I guess :
> > http://www.qtsoftware.com/products/appdev/add-on-products/catalog/4/Utili
> >ties/qtsingleapplication
> >
> > 2009/5/10 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
> >> I would rather see the multiple instances problem fixed before we
> >> include the file associations in the prereleases but it is up to you.
> >>
> >> I don't really know how to fix the problem myself but I did find a few
> >> web pages on the topic:
> >>
> >> http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/avoidmultinstance.aspx
> >> http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=1647&msg=796112
> >> http://wiki.forum.nokia.com/index.php/Launching_a_new_file_in_an_existin
> >>g_app_instance
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >> Lasconic wrote:
> >>> I plan to do a prerelease on monday. I didn't take a look to uninstall
> >>> yet. Any progress?
> >>> Do you think we should remove the file association for the prerelease?
> >>> lasconic
> >>>
> >>> 2009/5/5 Lasconic <[hidden email]>:
> >>>> If the icon has been set by a previous install, it does not work as it
> >>>> but only after reboot.
> >>>> I guess the icons are cached somewhere.
> >>>> If you check the registry the value is for default icon is set to
> >>>> mscore.exe,1.
> >>>>
> >>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>> Lasconic,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I had tried the same change but it doesn't seem to work for me. Is it
> >>>>> working for you? (Do your icons appear differently than before?) I
> >>>>> tested r.1802 as well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> David
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Lasconic wrote:
> >>>>>> Yes, I modified it.(change 0 by 1) I'm going to commit. Maybe we can
> >>>>>> chat about all this?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>> Lasconic,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I couldn't work out how to get FileAssociation.nsh to use the
> >>>>>>> second icon ("mscore.exe,1") instead of the first ("mscore.exe,0")
> >>>>>>> for .mscx and .mscz files. Maybe it can be modified for this
> >>>>>>> purpose.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> David
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
> >>>>>>>> There is no problem. It's just a matter of upgrading NSIS to the
> >>>>>>>> last version. It's ok for me.
> >>>>>>>> I think FileAssociation.nsh supports icons as well. No?
> >>>>>>>> This is ugly :
> >>>>>>>> http://gergo.erdi.hu/blog/2006-10-08-registering_windows_file_type
> >>>>>>>>s_with_nsis/ Having it in a separated script, maintain by the nsis
> >>>>>>>> community seems better to me. What do you think?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>> Lasconic,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Could it be the backslashes that are causing problems?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Anyway, here's another site that talks about registering Windows
> >>>>>>>>> file types (without using FileAssociation.nsh)
> >>>>>>>>> http://gergo.erdi.hu/blog/2006-10-08-registering_windows_file_typ
> >>>>>>>>>es_with_nsis/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> David
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> I tried to build on ubuntu 8.04 but the NSIS version shipped
> >>>>>>>>>> with this ubuntu version is not compatible with the
> >>>>>>>>>> FileAssociation.nsh as provided in the SVN...
> >>>>>>>>>> NSIS version in hardy is 2.33-1
> >>>>>>>>>> (http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/nsis) Current NSIS version is
> >>>>>>>>>> 2.44. I installed it from this PPA :
> >>>>>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~misery/+archive/ppa
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I will report if it leads to some conflicts in my environment.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Lasconic
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2009/4/30 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Unregister does not work for the moment and I don't know why
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Any idea david or someone?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Lasconic,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The uninstaller has never removed any of the registry settings
> >>>>>>>>>>> (which now includes file associations). This was on my list of
> >>>>>>>>>>> things I want to look into but I don't have any answers yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The other problem is that each new file you open via Windows
> >>>>>>>>>>> Exporer opens a new instance of MuseScore. This can lead to
> >>>>>>>>>>> high memory usage (particularly if you use large SoundFonts)
> >>>>>>>>>>> and there may some unforeseen problems with preference
> >>>>>>>>>>> settings, the Open Recent list, etc. It may even be a good idea
> >>>>>>>>>>> to remove the file association code before the next
> >>>>>>>>>>> prerelease--at least until we get a chance to address this. Any
> >>>>>>>>>>> thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> David Bolton
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://davidbolton.info
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY
> >> circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect
> >> world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job
> >> done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at
> >> 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled.
> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mscore-developer mailing list
> >> [hidden email]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK
> i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> _______________________________________________
> Mscore-developer mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

lasconic

Re: Setting file associations for Windows

Reply Threaded

Nice! Seems simpler than QtSingleApplication. I may take a look as well.
For reference :
http://www.nabble.com/using-dbus-in-the-platform-td12943318i20.html
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/intro-to-dbus.html
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/qtdbus.html#details

Lasconic

2009/5/10 Werner Schweer <[hidden email]>:

> On my todo list is to learn more about D-Bus which promises to be a more
> generic solution to such kind of problems and i would like to postpone the
> decision on how to proceed.
>
> On Sunday 10 May 2009 12:52:33 Lasconic wrote:
>> I took a closer look. There are a handful of files to be added. I
>> don't want to crash the build system or mess musescore startup.
>> So I pass for the moment. Werner maybe? :)
>>
>> 2009/5/10 Lasconic <[hidden email]>:
>> > Here is the Qt way I guess :
>> > http://www.qtsoftware.com/products/appdev/add-on-products/catalog/4/Utili
>> >ties/qtsingleapplication
>> >
>> > 2009/5/10 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>> >> I would rather see the multiple instances problem fixed before we
>> >> include the file associations in the prereleases but it is up to you.
>> >>
>> >> I don't really know how to fix the problem myself but I did find a few
>> >> web pages on the topic:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/avoidmultinstance.aspx
>> >> http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=1647&msg=796112
>> >> http://wiki.forum.nokia.com/index.php/Launching_a_new_file_in_an_existin
>> >>g_app_instance
>> >>
>> >> David
>> >>
>> >> Lasconic wrote:
>> >>> I plan to do a prerelease on monday. I didn't take a look to uninstall
>> >>> yet. Any progress?
>> >>> Do you think we should remove the file association for the prerelease?
>> >>> lasconic
>> >>>
>> >>> 2009/5/5 Lasconic <[hidden email]>:
>> >>>> If the icon has been set by a previous install, it does not work as it
>> >>>> but only after reboot.
>> >>>> I guess the icons are cached somewhere.
>> >>>> If you check the registry the value is for default icon is set to
>> >>>> mscore.exe,1.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>> >>>>> Lasconic,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I had tried the same change but it doesn't seem to work for me. Is it
>> >>>>> working for you? (Do your icons appear differently than before?) I
>> >>>>> tested r.1802 as well.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> David
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Lasconic wrote:
>> >>>>>> Yes, I modified it.(change 0 by 1) I'm going to commit. Maybe we can
>> >>>>>> chat about all this?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>> >>>>>>> Lasconic,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I couldn't work out how to get FileAssociation.nsh to use the
>> >>>>>>> second icon ("mscore.exe,1") instead of the first ("mscore.exe,0")
>> >>>>>>> for .mscx and .mscz files. Maybe it can be modified for this
>> >>>>>>> purpose.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> David
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> There is no problem. It's just a matter of upgrading NSIS to the
>> >>>>>>>> last version. It's ok for me.
>> >>>>>>>> I think FileAssociation.nsh supports icons as well. No?
>> >>>>>>>> This is ugly :
>> >>>>>>>> http://gergo.erdi.hu/blog/2006-10-08-registering_windows_file_type
>> >>>>>>>>s_with_nsis/ Having it in a separated script, maintain by the nsis
>> >>>>>>>> community seems better to me. What do you think?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>> >>>>>>>>> Lasconic,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Could it be the backslashes that are causing problems?
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Anyway, here's another site that talks about registering Windows
>> >>>>>>>>> file types (without using FileAssociation.nsh)
>> >>>>>>>>> http://gergo.erdi.hu/blog/2006-10-08-registering_windows_file_typ
>> >>>>>>>>>es_with_nsis/
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> David
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> I tried to build on ubuntu 8.04 but the NSIS version shipped
>> >>>>>>>>>> with this ubuntu version is not compatible with the
>> >>>>>>>>>> FileAssociation.nsh as provided in the SVN...
>> >>>>>>>>>> NSIS version in hardy is 2.33-1
>> >>>>>>>>>> (http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/nsis) Current NSIS version is
>> >>>>>>>>>> 2.44. I installed it from this PPA :
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~misery/+archive/ppa
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> I will report if it leads to some conflicts in my environment.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Lasconic
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> 2009/4/30 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Unregister does not work for the moment and I don't know why
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Any idea david or someone?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Lasconic,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> The uninstaller has never removed any of the registry settings
>> >>>>>>>>>>> (which now includes file associations). This was on my list of
>> >>>>>>>>>>> things I want to look into but I don't have any answers yet.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> The other problem is that each new file you open via Windows
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Exporer opens a new instance of MuseScore. This can lead to
>> >>>>>>>>>>> high memory usage (particularly if you use large SoundFonts)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> and there may some unforeseen problems with preference
>> >>>>>>>>>>> settings, the Open Recent list, etc. It may even be a good idea
>> >>>>>>>>>>> to remove the file association code before the next
>> >>>>>>>>>>> prerelease--at least until we get a chance to address this. Any
>> >>>>>>>>>>> thoughts?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>> David Bolton
>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://davidbolton.info
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY
>> >> circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect
>> >> world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job
>> >> done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at
>> >> 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled.
>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Mscore-developer mailing list
>> >> [hidden email]
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>--- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
>> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
>> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK
>> i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
>> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mscore-developer mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
> Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> _______________________________________________
> Mscore-developer mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>

lasconic

Re: Setting file associations for Windows

Reply Threaded

Sorry bad copy paste for the first link.
Here is the good one : http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-devel&m=119837208506790&w=2

2009/5/10 Lasconic <[hidden email]>:

> Nice! Seems simpler than QtSingleApplication. I may take a look as well.
> For reference :
> http://www.nabble.com/using-dbus-in-the-platform-td12943318i20.html
> http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/intro-to-dbus.html
> http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/qtdbus.html#details
>
> Lasconic
>
> 2009/5/10 Werner Schweer <[hidden email]>:
>> On my todo list is to learn more about D-Bus which promises to be a more
>> generic solution to such kind of problems and i would like to postpone the
>> decision on how to proceed.
>>
>> On Sunday 10 May 2009 12:52:33 Lasconic wrote:
>>> I took a closer look. There are a handful of files to be added. I
>>> don't want to crash the build system or mess musescore startup.
>>> So I pass for the moment. Werner maybe? :)
>>>
>>> 2009/5/10 Lasconic <[hidden email]>:
>>> > Here is the Qt way I guess :
>>> > http://www.qtsoftware.com/products/appdev/add-on-products/catalog/4/Utili
>>> >ties/qtsingleapplication
>>> >
>>> > 2009/5/10 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>>> >> I would rather see the multiple instances problem fixed before we
>>> >> include the file associations in the prereleases but it is up to you.
>>> >>
>>> >> I don't really know how to fix the problem myself but I did find a few
>>> >> web pages on the topic:
>>> >>
>>> >> http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/avoidmultinstance.aspx
>>> >> http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=1647&msg=796112
>>> >> http://wiki.forum.nokia.com/index.php/Launching_a_new_file_in_an_existin
>>> >>g_app_instance
>>> >>
>>> >> David
>>> >>
>>> >> Lasconic wrote:
>>> >>> I plan to do a prerelease on monday. I didn't take a look to uninstall
>>> >>> yet. Any progress?
>>> >>> Do you think we should remove the file association for the prerelease?
>>> >>> lasconic
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 2009/5/5 Lasconic <[hidden email]>:
>>> >>>> If the icon has been set by a previous install, it does not work as it
>>> >>>> but only after reboot.
>>> >>>> I guess the icons are cached somewhere.
>>> >>>> If you check the registry the value is for default icon is set to
>>> >>>> mscore.exe,1.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>>> >>>>> Lasconic,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I had tried the same change but it doesn't seem to work for me. Is it
>>> >>>>> working for you? (Do your icons appear differently than before?) I
>>> >>>>> tested r.1802 as well.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> David
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Lasconic wrote:
>>> >>>>>> Yes, I modified it.(change 0 by 1) I'm going to commit. Maybe we can
>>> >>>>>> chat about all this?
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>>> >>>>>>> Lasconic,
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> I couldn't work out how to get FileAssociation.nsh to use the
>>> >>>>>>> second icon ("mscore.exe,1") instead of the first ("mscore.exe,0")
>>> >>>>>>> for .mscx and .mscz files. Maybe it can be modified for this
>>> >>>>>>> purpose.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> David
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>> There is no problem. It's just a matter of upgrading NSIS to the
>>> >>>>>>>> last version. It's ok for me.
>>> >>>>>>>> I think FileAssociation.nsh supports icons as well. No?
>>> >>>>>>>> This is ugly :
>>> >>>>>>>> http://gergo.erdi.hu/blog/2006-10-08-registering_windows_file_type
>>> >>>>>>>>s_with_nsis/ Having it in a separated script, maintain by the nsis
>>> >>>>>>>> community seems better to me. What do you think?
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>>> >>>>>>>>> Lasconic,
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>> Could it be the backslashes that are causing problems?
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>> Anyway, here's another site that talks about registering Windows
>>> >>>>>>>>> file types (without using FileAssociation.nsh)
>>> >>>>>>>>> http://gergo.erdi.hu/blog/2006-10-08-registering_windows_file_typ
>>> >>>>>>>>>es_with_nsis/
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>> David
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>>> I tried to build on ubuntu 8.04 but the NSIS version shipped
>>> >>>>>>>>>> with this ubuntu version is not compatible with the
>>> >>>>>>>>>> FileAssociation.nsh as provided in the SVN...
>>> >>>>>>>>>> NSIS version in hardy is 2.33-1
>>> >>>>>>>>>> (http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/nsis) Current NSIS version is
>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2.44. I installed it from this PPA :
>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~misery/+archive/ppa
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>> I will report if it leads to some conflicts in my environment.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lasconic
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2009/4/30 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Unregister does not work for the moment and I don't know why
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Any idea david or someone?
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Lasconic,
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The uninstaller has never removed any of the registry settings
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (which now includes file associations). This was on my list of
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> things I want to look into but I don't have any answers yet.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The other problem is that each new file you open via Windows
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Exporer opens a new instance of MuseScore. This can lead to
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> high memory usage (particularly if you use large SoundFonts)
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and there may some unforeseen problems with preference
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> settings, the Open Recent list, etc. It may even be a good idea
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> to remove the file association code before the next
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> prerelease--at least until we get a chance to address this. Any
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> thoughts?
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> David Bolton
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://davidbolton.info
>>> >>
>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY
>>> >> circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect
>>> >> world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job
>>> >> done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at
>>> >> 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled.
>>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Mscore-developer mailing list
>>> >> [hidden email]
>>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>--- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
>>> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
>>> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK
>>> i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
>>> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mscore-developer mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
>> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
>> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
>> Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
>> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mscore-developer mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>>
>

KRL

Better Chord-Symbols

Reply Threaded

In reply to this post by lasconic

Hello everyone.

I have been unsatisfied with the chord symbol rendering in musescore for
quite some time now, and I decided to make up my mind about how chord
symbols should look like.

http://www.njonjo.net/chordfonts/chordfonts.pdf

This document is what I came up with. It would make me (and every user
of musescore with a jazz background) very happy if this document helps
get the chord symbols usable in musescore!

As I also said in the document: I can develop symbols if there is any
need for it.

Thanks a lot,
Karl

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

Nathan Hale

Re: Better Chord-Symbols

Reply Threaded

Thanks for this info/research Kalle. Very interesting, and I look
forward to seeing how these concepts may be integrated in our favorite
notation app!
~Nathan R. Hale
Rom. 12:2

------M y __W e b s i t e s--------------------------------
http://nathanrhale.com - personal site
http://productivelinux.com - get stuff done w/Linux!
http://linuxmusicians.com - create music freely
---------------------------------------------------------------------

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Kalle <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hello everyone.
>
> I have been unsatisfied with the chord symbol rendering in musescore for
> quite some time now, and I decided to make up my mind about how chord
> symbols should look like.
>
> http://www.njonjo.net/chordfonts/chordfonts.pdf
>
> This document is what I came up with. It would make me (and every user
> of musescore with a jazz background) very happy if this document helps
> get the chord symbols usable in musescore!
>
> As I also said in the document: I can develop symbols if there is any
> need for it.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Karl
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
> Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> _______________________________________________
> Mscore-developer mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>

lasconic

Re: Better Chord-Symbols

Reply Threaded

Thanks for the research indeed. Very interesting.
The most valuable information is the one about the layout I think.

Regarding the use of special character for maj7, half-diminished etc
... as you said it's a matter of taste and I think users need the
freedom to choose.
As you stated, you'll be satisfied with such symbols but other may
not. I'm pretty sure a lot of rock guitar players don't know about
Ctriangle but know Cmaj7.
I once proposed an implementation closed to the Finale one where there
is a chord library. You can choose from the library whant you want to
display for a given chords. If the preset does not suit your need you
can create new extensions. Moreover extensions are associated with a
chord decomposition. The decomposition is usable for playback, export
in midi or in musicXML. see :
http://n2.nabble.com/Empty-harmony-element-in-musicXML-export-td730789.html#a735694

2009/5/11 Nathan Hale <[hidden email]>:

> Thanks for this info/research Kalle. Very interesting, and I look
> forward to seeing how these concepts may be integrated in our favorite
> notation app!
> ~Nathan R. Hale
> Rom. 12:2
>
> ------M y __W e b s i t e s--------------------------------
> http://nathanrhale.com - personal site
> http://productivelinux.com - get stuff done w/Linux!
> http://linuxmusicians.com - create music freely
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Kalle <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hello everyone.
>>
>> I have been unsatisfied with the chord symbol rendering in musescore for
>> quite some time now, and I decided to make up my mind about how chord
>> symbols should look like.
>>
>> http://www.njonjo.net/chordfonts/chordfonts.pdf
>>
>> This document is what I came up with. It would make me (and every user
>> of musescore with a jazz background) very happy if this document helps
>> get the chord symbols usable in musescore!
>>
>> As I also said in the document: I can develop symbols if there is any
>> need for it.
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
>> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
>> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
>> Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
>> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mscore-developer mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
> Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> _______________________________________________
> Mscore-developer mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>

lasconic

Re: Setting file associations for Windows

Reply Threaded

In reply to this post by wschweer

I take another look to dbus and qt implementation. As far as I
understand, dbus can be used with a central server (bus daemon) or in
peer to peer.
To use it in musescore, cross platform, the daemon way is a dead end I guess ?
So I tried to figure out how the peer to peer one works. The qt dbus
examples all use the daemon approach ...
The winning class to do peer to peer seems to be :
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/qdbusserver.html
and as stated here http://marc.info/?l=freedesktop-dbus&m=121092641023133&w=2

"I can tell you about QtDBus: peer-to-peer is not implemented. The QDBusServer
class that is there is completely useless -- it's just a placeholder. You can
track it via this task:
http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?id=126631&method=entry
"
I took a look to the bug tracker task. It has be postponed to 4.6 :-(
Do you have more insight info ? Is the bug tracker wrong? or is dbus a
dead end for the moment ?

Lasconic

2009/5/10 Werner Schweer <[hidden email]>:

Toby Smithe-2

Re: Setting file associations for Windows

Reply Threaded

2009/5/12 Lasconic <[hidden email]>:
> I take another look to dbus and qt implementation. As far as I
> understand, dbus can be used with a central server (bus daemon) or in
> peer to peer.
> To use it in musescore, cross platform, the daemon way is a dead end I guess ?

I'm pretty sure the KDE on Windows project uses DBus centrally, and
[1] would have me believe that although the Windows port is not yet a
part of the reference implementation, it is still available. Of
course, using DBus like this would add another dependency to the list.

[1] http://techbase.kde.org/Getting_Started/Build/KDE4/Windows/Building_DBus

--
Toby Smithe :: http://fulltinreality.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

wschweer

Re: Setting file associations for Windows

Reply Threaded

In reply to this post by lasconic

Ok, until we know more about this i implemented the qtsinglecoreapplication.
It works for linux and (cross)compiles for windows (not tested).

On Tuesday 12 May 2009 10:43:41 Lasconic wrote:

> I take another look to dbus and qt implementation. As far as I
> understand, dbus can be used with a central server (bus daemon) or in
> peer to peer.
> To use it in musescore, cross platform, the daemon way is a dead end I
> guess ? So I tried to figure out how the peer to peer one works. The qt
> dbus examples all use the daemon approach ...
> The winning class to do peer to peer seems to be :
> http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/qdbusserver.html
> and as stated here
> http://marc.info/?l=freedesktop-dbus&m=121092641023133&w=2
>
> "I can tell you about QtDBus: peer-to-peer is not implemented. The
> QDBusServer class that is there is completely useless -- it's just a
> placeholder. You can track it via this task:
> http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?id=126631&method=ent
>ry "
> I took a look to the bug tracker task. It has be postponed to 4.6 :-(
> Do you have more insight info ? Is the bug tracker wrong? or is dbus a
> dead end for the moment ?
>
> Lasconic
>
> 2009/5/10 Werner Schweer <[hidden email]>:
> > On my todo list is to learn more about D-Bus which promises to be a more
> > generic solution to such kind of problems and i would like to postpone
> > the decision on how to proceed.
> >
> > On Sunday 10 May 2009 12:52:33 Lasconic wrote:
> >> I took a closer look. There are a handful of files to be added. I
> >> don't want to crash the build system or mess musescore startup.
> >> So I pass for the moment. Werner maybe? :)
> >>
> >> 2009/5/10 Lasconic <[hidden email]>:
> >> > Here is the Qt way I guess :
> >> > http://www.qtsoftware.com/products/appdev/add-on-products/catalog/4/Ut
> >> >ili ties/qtsingleapplication
> >> >
> >> > 2009/5/10 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
> >> >> I would rather see the multiple instances problem fixed before we
> >> >> include the file associations in the prereleases but it is up to you.
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't really know how to fix the problem myself but I did find a
> >> >> few web pages on the topic:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/avoidmultinstance.aspx
> >> >> http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=1647&msg=79611
> >> >>2
> >> >> http://wiki.forum.nokia.com/index.php/Launching_a_new_file_in_an_exis
> >> >>tin g_app_instance
> >> >>
> >> >> David
> >> >>
> >> >> Lasconic wrote:
> >> >>> I plan to do a prerelease on monday. I didn't take a look to
> >> >>> uninstall yet. Any progress?
> >> >>> Do you think we should remove the file association for the
> >> >>> prerelease? lasconic
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 2009/5/5 Lasconic <[hidden email]>:
> >> >>>> If the icon has been set by a previous install, it does not work as
> >> >>>> it but only after reboot.
> >> >>>> I guess the icons are cached somewhere.
> >> >>>> If you check the registry the value is for default icon is set to
> >> >>>> mscore.exe,1.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
> >> >>>>> Lasconic,
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I had tried the same change but it doesn't seem to work for me. Is
> >> >>>>> it working for you? (Do your icons appear differently than
> >> >>>>> before?) I tested r.1802 as well.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> David
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Lasconic wrote:
> >> >>>>>> Yes, I modified it.(change 0 by 1) I'm going to commit. Maybe we
> >> >>>>>> can chat about all this?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
> >> >>>>>>> Lasconic,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> I couldn't work out how to get FileAssociation.nsh to use the
> >> >>>>>>> second icon ("mscore.exe,1") instead of the first
> >> >>>>>>> ("mscore.exe,0") for .mscx and .mscz files. Maybe it can be
> >> >>>>>>> modified for this purpose.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> David
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>> There is no problem. It's just a matter of upgrading NSIS to
> >> >>>>>>>> the last version. It's ok for me.
> >> >>>>>>>> I think FileAssociation.nsh supports icons as well. No?
> >> >>>>>>>> This is ugly :
> >> >>>>>>>> http://gergo.erdi.hu/blog/2006-10-08-registering_windows_file_t
> >> >>>>>>>>ype s_with_nsis/ Having it in a separated script, maintain by
> >> >>>>>>>> the nsis community seems better to me. What do you think?
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
> >> >>>>>>>>> Lasconic,
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Could it be the backslashes that are causing problems?
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Anyway, here's another site that talks about registering
> >> >>>>>>>>> Windows file types (without using FileAssociation.nsh)
> >> >>>>>>>>> http://gergo.erdi.hu/blog/2006-10-08-registering_windows_file_
> >> >>>>>>>>>typ es_with_nsis/
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> David
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>> I tried to build on ubuntu 8.04 but the NSIS version shipped
> >> >>>>>>>>>> with this ubuntu version is not compatible with the
> >> >>>>>>>>>> FileAssociation.nsh as provided in the SVN...
> >> >>>>>>>>>> NSIS version in hardy is 2.33-1
> >> >>>>>>>>>> (http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/nsis) Current NSIS version
> >> >>>>>>>>>> is 2.44. I installed it from this PPA :
> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~misery/+archive/ppa
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> I will report if it leads to some conflicts in my
> >> >>>>>>>>>> environment.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Lasconic
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2009/4/30 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Unregister does not work for the moment and I don't know
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> why Any idea david or someone?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Lasconic,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> The uninstaller has never removed any of the registry
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> settings (which now includes file associations). This was on
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> my list of things I want to look into but I don't have any
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> answers yet.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> The other problem is that each new file you open via Windows
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Exporer opens a new instance of MuseScore. This can lead to
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> high memory usage (particularly if you use large SoundFonts)
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> and there may some unforeseen problems with preference
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> settings, the Open Recent list, etc. It may even be a good
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> idea to remove the file association code before the next
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> prerelease--at least until we get a chance to address this.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> David Bolton
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://davidbolton.info
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>--- ------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY
> >> >> circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a
> >> >> perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get
> >> >> the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full
> >> >> speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled.
> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Mscore-developer mailing list
> >> >> [hidden email]
> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>--- --- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY
> >> circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect
> >> world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job
> >> done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at
> >> 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled.
> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mscore-developer mailing list
> >> [hidden email]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >----- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances!
> > Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but
> > thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the
> > NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with
> > all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mscore-developer mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK
> i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> _______________________________________________
> Mscore-developer mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

lasconic

Re: Setting file associations for Windows

Reply Threaded

It compiles on windows and on ubuntu for windows. Unfortunately I
can't package on ubuntu... I will need to make the prerelease on
windows and I don't like it.
Regarding your changes, it works well on windows if you double click
on a file, and then another file. But if you open musescore once by
the menu and then double click a file, a second instance is created.

2009/5/12 Werner Schweer <[hidden email]>:

> Ok, until we know more about this i implemented the qtsinglecoreapplication.
> It works for linux and (cross)compiles for windows (not tested).
>
> On Tuesday 12 May 2009 10:43:41 Lasconic wrote:
>> I take another look to dbus and qt implementation. As far as I
>> understand, dbus can be used with a central server (bus daemon) or in
>> peer to peer.
>> To use it in musescore, cross platform, the daemon way is a dead end I
>> guess ? So I tried to figure out how the peer to peer one works. The qt
>> dbus examples all use the daemon approach ...
>> The winning class to do peer to peer seems to be :
>> http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/qdbusserver.html
>> and as stated here
>> http://marc.info/?l=freedesktop-dbus&m=121092641023133&w=2
>>
>> "I can tell you about QtDBus: peer-to-peer is not implemented. The
>> QDBusServer class that is there is completely useless -- it's just a
>> placeholder. You can track it via this task:
>> http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?id=126631&method=ent
>>ry "
>> I took a look to the bug tracker task. It has be postponed to 4.6 :-(
>> Do you have more insight info ? Is the bug tracker wrong? or is dbus a
>> dead end for the moment ?
>>
>> Lasconic
>>
>> 2009/5/10 Werner Schweer <[hidden email]>:
>> > On my todo list is to learn more about D-Bus which promises to be a more
>> > generic solution to such kind of problems and i would like to postpone
>> > the decision on how to proceed.
>> >
>> > On Sunday 10 May 2009 12:52:33 Lasconic wrote:
>> >> I took a closer look. There are a handful of files to be added. I
>> >> don't want to crash the build system or mess musescore startup.
>> >> So I pass for the moment. Werner maybe? :)
>> >>
>> >> 2009/5/10 Lasconic <[hidden email]>:
>> >> > Here is the Qt way I guess :
>> >> > http://www.qtsoftware.com/products/appdev/add-on-products/catalog/4/Ut
>> >> >ili ties/qtsingleapplication
>> >> >
>> >> > 2009/5/10 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>> >> >> I would rather see the multiple instances problem fixed before we
>> >> >> include the file associations in the prereleases but it is up to you.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I don't really know how to fix the problem myself but I did find a
>> >> >> few web pages on the topic:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/avoidmultinstance.aspx
>> >> >> http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=1647&msg=79611
>> >> >>2
>> >> >> http://wiki.forum.nokia.com/index.php/Launching_a_new_file_in_an_exis
>> >> >>tin g_app_instance
>> >> >>
>> >> >> David
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Lasconic wrote:
>> >> >>> I plan to do a prerelease on monday. I didn't take a look to
>> >> >>> uninstall yet. Any progress?
>> >> >>> Do you think we should remove the file association for the
>> >> >>> prerelease? lasconic
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> 2009/5/5 Lasconic <[hidden email]>:
>> >> >>>> If the icon has been set by a previous install, it does not work as
>> >> >>>> it but only after reboot.
>> >> >>>> I guess the icons are cached somewhere.
>> >> >>>> If you check the registry the value is for default icon is set to
>> >> >>>> mscore.exe,1.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>> >> >>>>> Lasconic,
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I had tried the same change but it doesn't seem to work for me. Is
>> >> >>>>> it working for you? (Do your icons appear differently than
>> >> >>>>> before?) I tested r.1802 as well.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> David
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Lasconic wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> Yes, I modified it.(change 0 by 1) I'm going to commit. Maybe we
>> >> >>>>>> can chat about all this?
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>> >> >>>>>>> Lasconic,
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> I couldn't work out how to get FileAssociation.nsh to use the
>> >> >>>>>>> second icon ("mscore.exe,1") instead of the first
>> >> >>>>>>> ("mscore.exe,0") for .mscx and .mscz files. Maybe it can be
>> >> >>>>>>> modified for this purpose.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> David
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>> There is no problem. It's just a matter of upgrading NSIS to
>> >> >>>>>>>> the last version. It's ok for me.
>> >> >>>>>>>> I think FileAssociation.nsh supports icons as well. No?
>> >> >>>>>>>> This is ugly :
>> >> >>>>>>>> http://gergo.erdi.hu/blog/2006-10-08-registering_windows_file_t
>> >> >>>>>>>>ype s_with_nsis/ Having it in a separated script, maintain by
>> >> >>>>>>>> the nsis community seems better to me. What do you think?
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> 2009/5/4 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Lasconic,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Could it be the backslashes that are causing problems?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Anyway, here's another site that talks about registering
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Windows file types (without using FileAssociation.nsh)
>> >> >>>>>>>>> http://gergo.erdi.hu/blog/2006-10-08-registering_windows_file_
>> >> >>>>>>>>>typ es_with_nsis/
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> David
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I tried to build on ubuntu 8.04 but the NSIS version shipped
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> with this ubuntu version is not compatible with the
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> FileAssociation.nsh as provided in the SVN...
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> NSIS version in hardy is 2.33-1
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> (http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/nsis) Current NSIS version
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> is 2.44. I installed it from this PPA :
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~misery/+archive/ppa
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I will report if it leads to some conflicts in my
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> environment.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Lasconic
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2009/4/30 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Lasconic wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Unregister does not work for the moment and I don't know
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> why Any idea david or someone?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Lasconic,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> The uninstaller has never removed any of the registry
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> settings (which now includes file associations). This was on
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> my list of things I want to look into but I don't have any
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> answers yet.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> The other problem is that each new file you open via Windows
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Exporer opens a new instance of MuseScore. This can lead to
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> high memory usage (particularly if you use large SoundFonts)
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> and there may some unforeseen problems with preference
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> settings, the Open Recent list, etc. It may even be a good
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> idea to remove the file association code before the next
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> prerelease--at least until we get a chance to address this.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> David Bolton
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://davidbolton.info
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>--- ------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY
>> >> >> circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a
>> >> >> perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get
>> >> >> the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full
>> >> >> speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled.
>> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> Mscore-developer mailing list
>> >> >> [hidden email]
>> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>--- --- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY
>> >> circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect
>> >> world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job
>> >> done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at
>> >> 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled.
>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Mscore-developer mailing list
>> >> [hidden email]
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>> >
>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >----- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances!
>> > Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but
>> > thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the
>> > NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with
>> > all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mscore-developer mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>--- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
>> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
>> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK
>> i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
>> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mscore-developer mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
> Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> _______________________________________________
> Mscore-developer mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>

David Bolton-2

Re: Setting file associations for Windows

Reply Threaded

Lasconic,

I tried the uninstaller again today for r.1825. This time it seemed to
remove the file associations. The icons went back to the generic icon
and double-clicking on it give the typical "Windows cannot open this
file" dialog. However, the tooltip still says "Type: Compressed
MuseScore File".

I'm not sure why it didn't work for either of us last time. Have you
tried since?

--
David Bolton
http://davidbolton.info

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables
unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine
for externally facing server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

lasconic

Re: Setting file associations for Windows

Reply Threaded

I built the prerelease for r1833 on windows. It's available.
The uninstaller does not work for me on vista but there are so many
fixes and new features since r1770...

Lasconic

2009/5/17 David Bolton <[hidden email]>:

> Lasconic,
>
> I tried the uninstaller again today for r.1825. This time it seemed to
> remove the file associations. The icons went back to the generic icon
> and double-clicking on it give the typical "Windows cannot open this
> file" dialog. However, the tooltip still says "Type: Compressed
> MuseScore File".
>
> I'm not sure why it didn't work for either of us last time. Have you
> tried since?
>
> --
> David Bolton
> http://davidbolton.info
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables
> unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine
> for externally facing server and web deployment.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> _______________________________________________
> Mscore-developer mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables
unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine
for externally facing server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

1 2