SVN write access request

[Dylan Beaudette]

+1 from me. thanks for all of the work on the Windows installer. I know
several people who are looking forward to a complete GRASS install for
windows.

Cheers,
Dylan

On Tuesday 01 September 2009, Cannata, Massimiliano wrote:

> Plus 1
> Thank-you for the great work
>
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:36:00 -0400
>
>   Helena Mitasova <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > +1 from me too.
> >
> > Thank you million times for WinGRASS - it allows us to
> > incorporate GRASS into our GIST program so we are
> >extremely grateful,
> >
> > Helena
> >
> >
> > Helena Mitasova
> > Associate Professor
> > Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
> > North Carolina State University
> > 1125 Jordan Hall
> > NCSU Box 8208
> > Raleigh, NC 27695-8208
> > http://skagit.meas.ncsu.edu/~helena/
> >
> > email: [hidden email]
> > ph: 919-513-1327 (no voicemail)
> > fax [phone]
> >
> > On Sep 1, 2009, at 3:08 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Colin
> >>
> >> Nielsen<[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>> Hello grass developers,
> >>> I am writing to request write access to the Main SVN so
> >>>I can  continue
> >>> to maintain the standalone native WinGrass installer,
> >>>the scripts
> >>> related to WinGrass packaging, and the WinGrass release
> >>>notes on the
> >>> website (rather than sending my patches to Markus).
> >>>
> >>> If I work on any bugs requiring C or Python code I plan
> >>>to continue  to
> >>> submit this work as patches to the trac system since my
> >>>coding still
> >>> needs reviewing before commit.
> >>>
> >>> I have read, and accept, the terms of the "Legal aspects
> >>>of code
> >>> contributions (RFC2)", and have an osgeo_id (cnielsen).
> >>>
> >>> Thanks and let me know if there is any more information
> >>>you require.
> >>
> >> I am all for it :-) +1
> >>
> >> Markus
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> grass-psc mailing list
> >> [hidden email]
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > grass-psc mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>
> _
> --------------------------------------
> Dr. Massimiliano Cannata
> Geomoatic engineer
> www.ist.supsi.ch
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

--
Dylan Beaudette
Soil Resource Laboratory
http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/
University of California at Davis
530.754.7341
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

[hamish-2]

Colin Nielsen wrote:
> I am writing to request write access to the Main SVN so I
> can  continue to maintain the standalone native WinGrass
> installer, the scripts related to WinGrass packaging, and the
> WinGrass release notes on the website (rather than sending
> my patches to Markus).

"+1" from me. (I half thought he already had it :)


Hamish





_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

[Paul Kelly]

On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Colin Nielsen wrote:

> Hello grass developers,
> I am writing to request write access to the Main SVN so I can continue
> to maintain the standalone native WinGrass installer, the scripts
> related to WinGrass packaging, and the WinGrass release notes on the
> website (rather than sending my patches to Markus).
>
> If I work on any bugs requiring C or Python code I plan to continue to
> submit this work as patches to the trac system since my coding still
> needs reviewing before commit.
>
> I have read, and accept, the terms of the "Legal aspects of code
> contributions (RFC2)", and have an osgeo_id (cnielsen).

Good choice of OSGeo ID! (Some of them don't bear any relation to the
user's name and are quite confusing :))

I don't see any problem with this; it's nice to see somebody nurturing the
WinGRASS stuff.
+1 from me.

Paul
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

[Markus Neteler]

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Colin Nielsen<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hello grass developers,
> I am writing to request write access to the Main SVN so I can continue
> to maintain the standalone native WinGrass installer, the scripts
> related to WinGrass packaging, and the WinGrass release notes on the
> website (rather than sending my patches to Markus).
>
> If I work on any bugs requiring C or Python code I plan to continue to
> submit this work as patches to the trac system since my coding still
> needs reviewing before commit.
>
> I have read, and accept, the terms of the "Legal aspects of code
> contributions (RFC2)", and have an osgeo_id (cnielsen).

We got a very clear picture:
Support from Michael, Helena, Massimiliano, Dylan, Hamish, Paul and me.

I declare the motion as passed: happy hacking!

Best,
Markus
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

[Scott Mitchell-5]

GRASS-PSC, sorry to put this (hopefully) in your inbox, but in that  
last round of voting my two attempts to send in a vote didn't get  
through, and we're trying to diagnose.

(this time it didn't matter, since I was voting in support like  
everyone else and there was no shortage of votes, but another time it  
might matter more)

On 4-Sep-09, at 01:57 , Markus Neteler wrote:

[...]

> No , that's not the case because I had to configure Mailman that  
> wrongly
> sent messages are dumped and not sent to me. I have 14 or more lists
> to control and also all spam stuff would be caught like this. Hundreds
> of messages to check every week.... so I rigorously simplified my  
> life :)
> If a sender isn't known, the message is silently dropped. Anything  
> else
> was not manageable.
>
> BUT! Read on...

OK, that makes more sense!

> ... I have changed grass-psc temporarily back to "Hold". Please try  
> again
> and it will be trapped for inspection.
>
> I can enable more, costs me nothing.
>
> But note that you right now send from
> <[hidden email]>
> which is again different...
>
> Just tell me the list of email addresses you want to have enabled.
>

[...]

> Well, sounds like too much extra work. Let's try to figure out the
> real problem. I suspect now that you wrote from
> <[hidden email]>
>                          ^^^^^
>
> which differs from
> <[hidden email]>
>
> and subsequently it was dropped.


Alright, you're right, it makes sense to get it fixed now, will do so  
with this message.  That last message was addressed just to you, so I  
didn't worry about the fact that the From address wasn't from one of  
the list addresses.

Sending this to the list, then.  It is From [hidden email]  
and is going through an authenticated SMTP server at the university.

Thanks,
Scott


_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

[Scott Mitchell-3]

Hmmm... I don't know whether to be happy this went right through, or  
sad that there's no longer a problem to diagnose.  So, to cover all  
bases, this one's addressed from [hidden email], which was the address  
I used on my first attempt to vote, and the address from which I was  
first subscribed to this list.

Sorry again for the junk in your email.  Last attempt to diagnose.

Scott

On 4-Sep-09, at 07:26 , Scott W Mitchell wrote:

>
> GRASS-PSC, sorry to put this (hopefully) in your inbox, but in that  
> last round of voting my two attempts to send in a vote didn't get  
> through, and we're trying to diagnose.
>
> (this time it didn't matter, since I was voting in support like  
> everyone else and there was no shortage of votes, but another time  
> it might matter more)
>
> On 4-Sep-09, at 01:57 , Markus Neteler wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> No , that's not the case because I had to configure Mailman that  
>> wrongly
>> sent messages are dumped and not sent to me. I have 14 or more lists
>> to control and also all spam stuff would be caught like this.  
>> Hundreds
>> of messages to check every week.... so I rigorously simplified my  
>> life :)
>> If a sender isn't known, the message is silently dropped. Anything  
>> else
>> was not manageable.
>>
>> BUT! Read on...
>
> OK, that makes more sense!
>
>> ... I have changed grass-psc temporarily back to "Hold". Please try  
>> again
>> and it will be trapped for inspection.
>>
>> I can enable more, costs me nothing.
>>
>> But note that you right now send from
>> <[hidden email]>
>> which is again different...
>>
>> Just tell me the list of email addresses you want to have enabled.
>>
> [...]
>
>> Well, sounds like too much extra work. Let's try to figure out the
>> real problem. I suspect now that you wrote from
>> <[hidden email]>
>>                         ^^^^^
>>
>> which differs from
>> <[hidden email]>
>>
>> and subsequently it was dropped.
>
>
> Alright, you're right, it makes sense to get it fixed now, will do  
> so with this message.  That last message was addressed just to you,  
> so I didn't worry about the fact that the From address wasn't from  
> one of the list addresses.
>
> Sending this to the list, then.  It is From  
> [hidden email] and is going through an authenticated  
> SMTP server at the university.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

[Markus Neteler]

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Scott W
Mitchell<[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> GRASS-PSC, sorry to put this (hopefully) in your inbox, but in that last

(yes, arrived)

> round of voting my two attempts to send in a vote didn't get through, and
> we're trying to diagnose.
>
> (this time it didn't matter, since I was voting in support like everyone
> else and there was no shortage of votes, but another time it might matter
> more)

OK, situations like this should be avoided of course.
Suggestion below:

> On 4-Sep-09, at 01:57 , Markus Neteler wrote:
> [...]
>
>> No , that's not the case because I had to configure Mailman that wrongly
>> sent messages are dumped and not sent to me. I have 14 or more lists
>> to control and also all spam stuff would be caught like this. Hundreds
>> of messages to check every week.... so I rigorously simplified my life :)
>> If a sender isn't known, the message is silently dropped. Anything else
>> was not manageable.
>>
>> BUT! Read on...
>
> OK, that makes more sense!
>
>> ... I have changed grass-psc temporarily back to "Hold". Please try again
>> and it will be trapped for inspection.

I have already a bunch of spam in the queue now  collected over the
last few hours :-)


...
> Alright, you're right, it makes sense to get it fixed now, will do so with
> this message.  That last message was addressed just to you, so I didn't
> worry about the fact that the From address wasn't from one of the list
> addresses.
>
> Sending this to the list, then.  It is From [hidden email] and
> is going through an authenticated SMTP server at the university.

This works.

Suggestion 1: if you have addresses you want to post from and which
you don't want to subscribe, I can add them in Mailman to not get them
dropped. But this offer is valid only for this grass-psc list.

Suggestion 2: put me in CC if you are unsure and I'll realize that it didn't
reach the list (I use filters to labels emails so I immediately see that the
grass-psc label is missing; double mails are automatically filtered). But
offer only valid for this grass-psc list of course.

Cheers
Markus
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

[hamish-2]

Markus wrote:
> Suggestion 1: if you have addresses you want to post from
> and which you don't want to subscribe, I can add them in
> Mailman to not get them dropped. But this offer is valid
> only for this grass-psc list.

idea: in the mailman subscription page (where you turn off the
monthly reminder) there is an option to stop delivering mail,
but it isn't unsubscribe. If you stay subscribed but check the
"on vacation" button, perhaps you can still send mail to the
list anyway.


Hamish



     

_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

[Markus Neteler]

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Hamish<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Markus wrote:
>> Suggestion 1: if you have addresses you want to post from
>> and which you don't want to subscribe, I can add them in
>> Mailman to not get them dropped. But this offer is valid
>> only for this grass-psc list.
>
> idea: in the mailman subscription page (where you turn off the
> monthly reminder) there is an option to stop delivering mail,
> but it isn't unsubscribe. If you stay subscribed but check the
> "on vacation" button, perhaps you can still send mail to the
> list anyway.

I also had this idea as well but it will lead to rather skewed subscription
statistics when/if many people start to subscribe several addresses...

shrug,
Markus
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

[Markus Neteler]

BTW: please don't use
<[hidden email]>
but
<[hidden email]>

I am surprised that the forwarder still works (thought I disabled
it due to spam hijacking).

Markus
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc