Resurrecting the OGR datastore

5 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
aaime

Resurrecting the OGR datastore

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Hi all,
I'm starting to look into resurrecting the OGR datastore from
its limbo now that I'm based on Ubuntu.

The plan is to make it compile and build again and test it against
some of the stores we're abandoning (among others).

One thing that needs discussing is which version of OGR to use.
I think I'm stuck using the same version as the GDAL plugins,
given that GDAL and OGR cannot be separated.

ImageIO-ext is still using 1.4.5 whilst the latest stable
is 1.6.1.
I'm wondering if there are any upgrade plans and what the expected
timeframe might be.

The desire for being interested in the latest version is that
if I end up needing any change in the java binding api I can
push the patch back directly, whilst using older versions will
result in a patchset that needs to be maintained and applied
at each new release.

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Andrea Antonello

Re: Resurrecting the OGR datastore

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Hi Andrea,
what is the exact purpose of the ogr datastore? Reading ogr supported
data into featurecollections?

Thanks,
Andrea


On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Andrea Aime<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm starting to look into resurrecting the OGR datastore from
> its limbo now that I'm based on Ubuntu.
>
> The plan is to make it compile and build again and test it against
> some of the stores we're abandoning (among others).
>
> One thing that needs discussing is which version of OGR to use.
> I think I'm stuck using the same version as the GDAL plugins,
> given that GDAL and OGR cannot be separated.
>
> ImageIO-ext is still using 1.4.5 whilst the latest stable
> is 1.6.1.
> I'm wondering if there are any upgrade plans and what the expected
> timeframe might be.
>
> The desire for being interested in the latest version is that
> if I end up needing any change in the java binding api I can
> push the patch back directly, whilst using older versions will
> result in a patchset that needs to be maintained and applied
> at each new release.
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> --
> Andrea Aime
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Expert service straight from the developers.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Andrea Antonello

Re: Resurrecting the OGR datastore

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Ups, found it http://geotools.codehaus.org/OGR+Data+Store
sorry for breaking the thread.

Cheers
Andrea


On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 5:39 PM, andrea
antonello<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Andrea,
> what is the exact purpose of the ogr datastore? Reading ogr supported
> data into featurecollections?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrea
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Andrea Aime<[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm starting to look into resurrecting the OGR datastore from
>> its limbo now that I'm based on Ubuntu.
>>
>> The plan is to make it compile and build again and test it against
>> some of the stores we're abandoning (among others).
>>
>> One thing that needs discussing is which version of OGR to use.
>> I think I'm stuck using the same version as the GDAL plugins,
>> given that GDAL and OGR cannot be separated.
>>
>> ImageIO-ext is still using 1.4.5 whilst the latest stable
>> is 1.6.1.
>> I'm wondering if there are any upgrade plans and what the expected
>> timeframe might be.
>>
>> The desire for being interested in the latest version is that
>> if I end up needing any change in the java binding api I can
>> push the patch back directly, whilst using older versions will
>> result in a patchset that needs to be maintained and applied
>> at each new release.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>> --
>> Andrea Aime
>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>> Expert service straight from the developers.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geotools-devel mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
aaime

Re: Resurrecting the OGR datastore

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by aaime
Andrea Aime ha scritto:

> Hi all,
> I'm starting to look into resurrecting the OGR datastore from
> its limbo now that I'm based on Ubuntu.
>
> The plan is to make it compile and build again and test it against
> some of the stores we're abandoning (among others).
>
> One thing that needs discussing is which version of OGR to use.
> I think I'm stuck using the same version as the GDAL plugins,
> given that GDAL and OGR cannot be separated.
>
> ImageIO-ext is still using 1.4.5 whilst the latest stable
> is 1.6.1.
> I'm wondering if there are any upgrade plans and what the expected
> timeframe might be.

Hmmm... it would seem the old version number is biting me on
Ubuntu Jaunty, I get a compile error which happens only
on gcc 4.3+ (Jaunty has 4.3.3) and apparently GDAL fixed it
in version 1.5.1, or so this Gentoo issue reports:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217876

I did try to build 1.5.4 and in fact it built without issues.

Maybe the imageio-ext people do have an extra patch, or they
just keep on building with older compilers?

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Daniele Romagnoli-2

Re: Resurrecting the OGR datastore

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Hi Andrea,
sorry about the late reply.
Invoking a gcc -version on our Ubuntu (8.10) machine we get 4.3.2.
On 64 bit build, we have disabled the Ilwis driver which give us some errors (We have disabled being not actually supported by any imageio-ext plugin implementation).

Anyway, we are planning to move to new versions of GDAL (1.5.4 or 1.6.1).
Simone may give you additional details on this topic.

Regards,
Daniele


On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Andrea Aime <[hidden email]> wrote:
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Hi all,
> I'm starting to look into resurrecting the OGR datastore from
> its limbo now that I'm based on Ubuntu.
>
> The plan is to make it compile and build again and test it against
> some of the stores we're abandoning (among others).
>
> One thing that needs discussing is which version of OGR to use.
> I think I'm stuck using the same version as the GDAL plugins,
> given that GDAL and OGR cannot be separated.
>
> ImageIO-ext is still using 1.4.5 whilst the latest stable
> is 1.6.1.
> I'm wondering if there are any upgrade plans and what the expected
> timeframe might be.

Hmmm... it would seem the old version number is biting me on
Ubuntu Jaunty, I get a compile error which happens only
on gcc 4.3+ (Jaunty has 4.3.3) and apparently GDAL fixed it
in version 1.5.1, or so this Gentoo issue reports:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217876

I did try to build 1.5.4 and in fact it built without issues.

Maybe the imageio-ext people do have an extra patch, or they
just keep on building with older compilers?

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel



--
-------------------------------------------------------
Eng. Daniele Romagnoli
Software Engineer

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy

phone: +39 0584983027
fax:     +39 0584983027
mob:   +39 328 0559267


http://www.geo-solutions.it

-------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel