Remarks on field type in gvSIG1.1

3 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
Wolfgang Qual

Remarks on field type in gvSIG1.1

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Hi list,
when adding a new field in the field manager of gvSIG, I have the possibility
to specify a value for Decimal Count. However, when using the new field
calculator, result values (type double) do have quite more numbers after the
","
I would have expected (for example) 3.123, but I get 3,12346758578997...
Any ideas? However, I really appreciate the new field calculator. This is a
great step forward, developers!

Best,
Wolfgang

Waldemar

Re: Remarks on field type in gvSIG1.1

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Hi Wolfgang,

I have the same problem.
So I wanted to ask whether have you solved the problem?

Best, Waldemar



Wolfgang Qual wrote:
Hi list,
when adding a new field in the field manager of gvSIG, I have the possibility
to specify a value for Decimal Count. However, when using the new field
calculator, result values (type double) do have quite more numbers after the
","
I would have expected (for example) 3.123, but I get 3,12346758578997...
Any ideas? However, I really appreciate the new field calculator. This is a
great step forward, developers!

Best,
Wolfgang
Wolfgang Qual

Re: Remarks on field type in gvSIG1.1

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Hello Waldemar,
I did not test this with one of the latest builds. will do this the next
days, if I will find the time...

Best,
Wolfgang


Am Montag, den 19.10.2009, 00:34 -0700 schrieb Waldemar:

> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> I have the same problem.
> So I wanted to ask whether have you solved the problem?
>
> Best, Waldemar
>
>
>
>
> Wolfgang Qual wrote:
> >
> > Hi list,
> > when adding a new field in the field manager of gvSIG, I have the
> > possibility
> > to specify a value for Decimal Count. However, when using the new field
> > calculator, result values (type double) do have quite more numbers after
> > the
> > ","
> > I would have expected (for example) 3.123, but I get 3,12346758578997...
> > Any ideas? However, I really appreciate the new field calculator. This is
> > a
> > great step forward, developers!
> >
> > Best,
> > Wolfgang
> >
> >
> >
>

_______________________________________________
Gvsig_internacional mailing list
[hidden email]
http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional