Thank you for this submission. I will make sure it gets included in
the upcoming release of the CPE Dictionary.
As for the metadata, the notes field is free-form at the current time
so I would not be concerned with including blank fields for
consistency. I would just extract what is presently available.
Note that CPE as an initiative has stayed away from calling out
specific metadata fields (similar to the approach used by CVE). We
have wanted to focus more on the ID and less on figuring out what
pieces of metadata are important.
thanks
Drew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas R. Jones [mailto:
[hidden email]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 6:47 PM
> To: cpe-discussion-list CPE Community Forum
> Subject: [CPE-DISCUSSION-LIST] Novell Product CPE Dictionary
> - 2007.07.10
>
> Hello all,
>
> Here is my submission for the beginning identification of the Novell
> products.
>
> Many of the commercial Novell products have values for the metadata
> included in these identifiers. However due to the open source
> nature of
> these distributions; they do not. Should we include this metadata(or
> lack thereof) to be consistent when other commercial products are
> identified at a later date? Or just extract this metadata and
> deal with
> it as the time comes?
>
> Thomas R. Jones
>