Re: HTML-based/Browser apps (was Re: anti-cheating)

2 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
S Page-2

Re: HTML-based/Browser apps (was Re: anti-cheating)

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Sameer Verma wrote:
>> E.g. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/FindTheCountry -- why bother with crappy
>> static PDF atlases when interactive technology like that is available?
>> And you can View > Source it!
>>    
> This is one of the coolest things I've seen in a long time!!! This is
> definitely going down in the SVG examples section for my class in
> Spring.
>  
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/SVG#Resources also lists
* http://www.carto.net/papers/svg/samples/canvas.shtml is code to
show/hide map layers.

With advanced HTML you can imagine scalable interactive SVG maps,
science texts with interactive JavaScript + <canvas> physics simulations
(like the WIMS stuff but running in the browser), biology texts with
layers that show and hide different anatomical systems... All with quiz
modules that work offline and online.  Unfortunately collaborative
editing on wiki pages and Flossmanuals doesn't support that level of
interactivity, and the people with skills to do it are rare.

--
=S
_______________________________________________
Library mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/library
S Page-2

Re: HTML-based/Browser apps (was Re: anti-cheating)

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Carlos Nazareno wrote:

> You can go with Processing (http://www.processing.org/) but Java is a
> bit problematic on the XO.

Heh, http://ejohn.org/blog/processingjs/ is the Processing language
running in a <canvas>.  Works on XO, slowly.  (I hope XULRunner 1.9.1
with the Tracemonkey JIT shows up in joyrunner builds.)

> Why put yourself through unnecessary pain with the
> HTML5/Javascript/CSS/SVG/whathaveyouforaudio&video&webcam combo? Add
> to that the added headache of the standards fragmented browser
> landscape.

There is no fragmentation, the XO ships with XULRunner.

> Flash gets the job done, and gets it done easy.

I worked at Macromedia for 9 years, I know well of Flash's many
benefits, and many downsides for OLPC.  Rather than debate it, if
there's Flash content relevant to OLPC's mission, mention it on the
wiki.  A few days ago I added a brief mention of the SWF format to
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Image_file_formats before I noticed someone
had already put it under "List of objectionable formats" on the talk
page; I don't care deeply either way.

--
=S Page
_______________________________________________
Library mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/library