RE: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions

6 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
Trevor Wekel

RE: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Hi Orest,

There is a corresponding MapGuide RFC to expose the Detailed Fdo Exceptions through the MapGuide API http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc79.  This work is being done by Autodesk.  I do not know if there will be an impact on the MapGuide feature if the detailed exceptions are not exposed.

I am cross posting to the MapGuide Internals list for clarification from the implementers of the MapGuide RFC.

Thanks,
Trevor


From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Orest Halustchak
Sent: August 25, 2009 6:46 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions

Hi,

Regarding FDO RFC 37: http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc37

The native error code part of this RFC will be done for FDO 3.5, but the additional detailed exceptions will be done for the release after this. Let me know if that will be a problem for anyone.

Thanks,
Orest.

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
Traian Stanev

RE: RE: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink

Yes, we will have to drop the same part of the MapGuide RFC. As far as I know (I checked in Aleck's patch for RFC 79 yesterday), only the native error code is implemented in MapGuide as well.

Traian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:mapguide-internals-
> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:29 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List; MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about
> implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions
>
> Hi Orest,
>
> There is a corresponding MapGuide RFC to expose the Detailed Fdo Exceptions
> through the MapGuide API http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc79.
> This work is being done by Autodesk.  I do not know if there will be an
> impact on the MapGuide feature if the detailed exceptions are not exposed.
>
> I am cross posting to the MapGuide Internals list for clarification from the
> implementers of the MapGuide RFC.
>
> Thanks,
> Trevor
>
>
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:fdo-internals-
> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Orest Halustchak
> Sent: August 25, 2009 6:46 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed
> Exceptions
>
> Hi,
>
> Regarding FDO RFC 37: http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc37
>
> The native error code part of this RFC will be done for FDO 3.5, but the
> additional detailed exceptions will be done for the release after this. Let
> me know if that will be a problem for anyone.
>
> Thanks,
> Orest.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
Greg Boone

RE: RE: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
I am not against the separated development paths, but is there a reason why the detailed exception code cannot go into the trunk?

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Traian Stanev
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:33 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List; FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions


Yes, we will have to drop the same part of the MapGuide RFC. As far as I know (I checked in Aleck's patch for RFC 79 yesterday), only the native error code is implemented in MapGuide as well.

Traian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:mapguide-internals-
> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:29 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List; MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about
> implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions
>
> Hi Orest,
>
> There is a corresponding MapGuide RFC to expose the Detailed Fdo Exceptions
> through the MapGuide API http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc79.
> This work is being done by Autodesk.  I do not know if there will be an
> impact on the MapGuide feature if the detailed exceptions are not exposed.
>
> I am cross posting to the MapGuide Internals list for clarification from the
> implementers of the MapGuide RFC.
>
> Thanks,
> Trevor
>
>
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:fdo-internals-
> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Orest Halustchak
> Sent: August 25, 2009 6:46 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed
> Exceptions
>
> Hi,
>
> Regarding FDO RFC 37: http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc37
>
> The native error code part of this RFC will be done for FDO 3.5, but the
> additional detailed exceptions will be done for the release after this. Let
> me know if that will be a problem for anyone.
>
> Thanks,
> Orest.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
Traian Stanev

RE: RE: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink

You mean for FDO?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:fdo-internals-
> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:41 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List; FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about
> implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions
>
> I am not against the separated development paths, but is there a reason why
> the detailed exception code cannot go into the trunk?
>
> Greg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:mapguide-internals-
> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Traian Stanev
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:33 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List; FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about
> implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions
>
>
> Yes, we will have to drop the same part of the MapGuide RFC. As far as I
> know (I checked in Aleck's patch for RFC 79 yesterday), only the native
> error code is implemented in MapGuide as well.
>
> Traian
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [hidden email] [mailto:mapguide-
> internals-
> > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:29 AM
> > To: FDO Internals Mail List; MapGuide Internals Mail List
> > Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about
> > implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions
> >
> > Hi Orest,
> >
> > There is a corresponding MapGuide RFC to expose the Detailed Fdo
> Exceptions
> > through the MapGuide API http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc79.
> > This work is being done by Autodesk.  I do not know if there will be an
> > impact on the MapGuide feature if the detailed exceptions are not exposed.
> >
> > I am cross posting to the MapGuide Internals list for clarification from
> the
> > implementers of the MapGuide RFC.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Trevor
> >
> >
> > From: [hidden email] [mailto:fdo-internals-
> > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Orest Halustchak
> > Sent: August 25, 2009 6:46 AM
> > To: FDO Internals Mail List
> > Subject: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed
> > Exceptions
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Regarding FDO RFC 37: http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc37
> >
> > The native error code part of this RFC will be done for FDO 3.5, but the
> > additional detailed exceptions will be done for the release after this.
> Let
> > me know if that will be a problem for anyone.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Orest.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mapguide-internals mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
Greg Boone

RE: RE: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Yes, for FDO.

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Traian Stanev
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:43 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List; MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions


You mean for FDO?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:fdo-internals-
> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:41 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List; FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about
> implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions
>
> I am not against the separated development paths, but is there a reason why
> the detailed exception code cannot go into the trunk?
>
> Greg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:mapguide-internals-
> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Traian Stanev
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:33 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List; FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about
> implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions
>
>
> Yes, we will have to drop the same part of the MapGuide RFC. As far as I
> know (I checked in Aleck's patch for RFC 79 yesterday), only the native
> error code is implemented in MapGuide as well.
>
> Traian
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [hidden email] [mailto:mapguide-
> internals-
> > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:29 AM
> > To: FDO Internals Mail List; MapGuide Internals Mail List
> > Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about
> > implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions
> >
> > Hi Orest,
> >
> > There is a corresponding MapGuide RFC to expose the Detailed Fdo
> Exceptions
> > through the MapGuide API http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc79.
> > This work is being done by Autodesk.  I do not know if there will be an
> > impact on the MapGuide feature if the detailed exceptions are not exposed.
> >
> > I am cross posting to the MapGuide Internals list for clarification from
> the
> > implementers of the MapGuide RFC.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Trevor
> >
> >
> > From: [hidden email] [mailto:fdo-internals-
> > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Orest Halustchak
> > Sent: August 25, 2009 6:46 AM
> > To: FDO Internals Mail List
> > Subject: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed
> > Exceptions
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Regarding FDO RFC 37: http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc37
> >
> > The native error code part of this RFC will be done for FDO 3.5, but the
> > additional detailed exceptions will be done for the release after this.
> Let
> > me know if that will be a problem for anyone.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Orest.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mapguide-internals mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
Tom Fukushima

A note about implementation of RFC 79 - Detailed Exceptions

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Trevor Wekel
Hi All,

Please note that we plan to implement the exception hierarchy part of MGOS RFC 79 for "Detailed Exception" in 2.3 (i.e., after 2.2) stream; the "GetNativeErrorCode" method will be added to 2.2.  This is due to resource constraints with respect to testing.  If this will cause you an inconvenience please tell me (perhaps something can be worked out).  If there are no problems, I will update the RFC with this information.

Information about the corresponding FDO RFC 37 is below.

Thanks
Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:29 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List; MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions

Hi Orest,

There is a corresponding MapGuide RFC to expose the Detailed Fdo Exceptions through the MapGuide API http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc79.  This work is being done by Autodesk.  I do not know if there will be an impact on the MapGuide feature if the detailed exceptions are not exposed.

I am cross posting to the MapGuide Internals list for clarification from the implementers of the MapGuide RFC.

Thanks,
Trevor


From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Orest Halustchak
Sent: August 25, 2009 6:46 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions

Hi,

Regarding FDO RFC 37: http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc37

The native error code part of this RFC will be done for FDO 3.5, but the additional detailed exceptions will be done for the release after this. Let me know if that will be a problem for anyone.

Thanks,
Orest.

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals