Thanks for pointing this out.
Your observation further highlights the need for a submission management
process. It seems like when someone submits names that are redundant,
deemed to not be valid CPEs (some obvious errors were pointed out to me this
morning), or are re-mapped to different names, we need to have a mechanism
to say what the disposition was. More importantly, the submitter should be
given the mapping of the submitted CPE names to the validated final names
that result along with error messages for CPEs that can't be mapped or
validated.
Obviously, this is a manpower problem. We'll be talking with NIST and MITRE
about how the submission, validation, and tracking processes should work.
Lt Col Joseph L. Wolfkiel
Director, Computer Network Defense Research & Technology (CND R&T) Program
Management Office
9800 Savage Rd Ste 6767
Ft Meade, MD 20755-6767
Commercial 410-854-5401 DSN 244-5401
Fax 410-854-6700
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark J Cox [mailto:
[hidden email]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 4:46 AM
To:
[hidden email]
Subject: Re: [CPE-DISCUSSION-LIST] Product list for the CPE Dictionary
> Please add them to the queue for the CPE dictionary. I plan to have the
> product-only cpe names to you by Friday.
There are conflicts in that dictionary with the official Red Hat names,
please use the existing ones. (We made a number of fixes since the 2.0
disctionary available from nvd).
Thanks, Mark
--
Mark J Cox / Red Hat Security Response Team