Francis Macnab of the Collins St Uniting Church - directly opposite Scots Church - is at it again, promoting his liberal and heterodox version of the Christian faith. Only this time, it seems as if he's quite happy to ditch even the adjective 'Christian' and go with 'a new faith for the 21st century'.
See:
http://www.theage.com.au/national/new-faith-throws-out-the-ten-commandments-20080915-4h3d.htmlA few points from the article:
- he calls Moses a mass murderer and Jesus a Jewish peasant who was certainly not God
- there is no God, just a presence within and between us
- new faith transcends dogma and denominations and religions
- new faith is 'a more humanitarian understanding'
- he's engaged the media guru who advised George Pell when he was Catholic Archbishop of Melbourne
- there's a giant banner now up on his building, cnr Collins and Russell Sts
- he's spending $120,000
- he's not accountable to the rest of the Uniting Church
In a sense he's not doing anything new or that hasn't been done by the world before. But it's different when a clerical person does it. It gives it the imprimatur of the church and affects the public perception of the Christian faith. So it affects the ministry that all of us are trying to do.
Action: write into The Age with a response to this! 2. Selling candy to children. One of the things I’ve been thinking about is the extent to which we identify with people and their thinking, needs and wants as we proclaim Christ. So, in Acts 17, Paul shows that he understands what they’re reading and their religious culture; affirms what he can; corrects them and proclaims the differences.
Macnab is simply saying to the culture what they want to hear already – that religious difference is evil and all we need to be is more in touch with ourselves and do good. But because of this, he'll probably win converts and a lot of airspace some media outlets. It's just like selling candy to children! Plus he’s spending real money on a real campaign, so he'll probably sell lots.
Question for discussion: how far do we go in evangelism in meeting our culture’s expectations or ‘felt needs’ in order to make a connection?
At one end of the spectrum (for exaggeration's sake) there's the 'Here's a Bible in its pure original languages, read it and be converted' tactic - and at the other there's the HWP gospel sans Jesus, the Cross and heaven and hell.
I’ve just been reading a new evangelistic tool from an IVF staffworker in the US – James Choung’s
True Story. It seemed so relevant and better connected to creation theology than say,
Two Ways to Live, until I finished the book and realised there was no heaven or hell. Oops.