Motion RE Sandbox access?

[Jason Birch]

Given that we seem to have failed on the meeting thing this week, I would like to get one of the items out of the way with a motion.

Are there any great objections to me tabling a motion worded something like:

"that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any developer proposed by a member of the PSC without the requirement of a vote, and that said sandbox access can either be user-based or project-based"

?

Jason

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Paul Spencer-2]

No great objection.  Paul

On 17-Jul-09, at 1:58 PM, Jason Birch wrote:

> Given that we seem to have failed on the meeting thing this week, I  
> would like to get one of the items out of the way with a motion.
>
> Are there any great objections to me tabling a motion worded  
> something like:
>
> "that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any  
> developer proposed by a member of the PSC without the requirement of  
> a vote, and that said sandbox access can either be user-based or  
> project-based"
>
> ?
>
> Jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

__________________________________________

    Paul Spencer
    Chief Technology Officer
    DM Solutions Group Inc
    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Tom Fukushima]

+1 Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 11:59 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] Motion RE Sandbox access?

Given that we seem to have failed on the meeting thing this week, I would like to get one of the items out of the way with a motion.

Are there any great objections to me tabling a motion worded something like:

"that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any developer proposed by a member of the PSC without the requirement of a vote, and that said sandbox access can either be user-based or project-based"

?

Jason

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Bruce Dechant]

+1 Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 11:59 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] Motion RE Sandbox access?

Given that we seem to have failed on the meeting thing this week, I would like to get one of the items out of the way with a motion.

Are there any great objections to me tabling a motion worded something like:

"that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any developer proposed by a member of the PSC without the requirement of a vote, and that said sandbox access can either be user-based or project-based"

?

Jason

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Haris Kurtagic]

+1
Haris

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jason
Birch
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 7:59 PM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] Motion RE Sandbox access?

Given that we seem to have failed on the meeting thing this week, I
would like to get one of the items out of the way with a motion.

Are there any great objections to me tabling a motion worded something
like:

"that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any developer
proposed by a member of the PSC without the requirement of a vote, and
that said sandbox access can either be user-based or project-based"

?

Jason

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Andy Morsell]

+1 Andy



-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Birch [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 10:59 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] Motion RE Sandbox access?

Given that we seem to have failed on the meeting thing this week, I would
like to get one of the items out of the way with a motion.

Are there any great objections to me tabling a motion worded something like:

"that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any developer
proposed by a member of the PSC without the requirement of a vote, and that
said sandbox access can either be user-based or project-based"

?

Jason




_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S]

+1 Kenneth

Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S



Jason Birch skrev:

> Given that we seem to have failed on the meeting thing this week, I would like to get one of the items out of the way with a motion.
>
> Are there any great objections to me tabling a motion worded something like:
>
> "that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any developer proposed by a member of the PSC without the requirement of a vote, and that said sandbox access can either be user-based or project-based"
>
> ?
>
> Jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>  

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Jason Birch]

Do I need to formalize this be re-submitting as a real motion?

We're currently sitting at:

+1: Tom, Bruce, Haris, Andy, Kenneth (and me)
No great objection: Paul
No comment: Bob

How about this...  by end of day Monday (GMT -7), if nobody objects, I'll treat the following as passed:

"that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any developer proposed by a member of the PSC (via an email to the MapGuide-Internals mailing list) without the requirement of a vote.  Sandbox access can either be user-based or project-based based on the stated needs."

In the future, I'm going make an effort to distinguish better between discussion and motion.

Jason


________________________________________
From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 10:58 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] Motion RE Sandbox access?

Given that we seem to have failed on the meeting thing this week, I would like to get one of the items out of the way with a motion.

Are there any great objections to me tabling a motion worded something like:

"that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any developer proposed by a member of the PSC without the requirement of a vote, and that said sandbox access can either be user-based or project-based"

?

Jason

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Paul Spencer-2]

Perhaps it was the "are there any great objections to me tabling a  
motion worded something like" that threw me ... if you did table such  
a motion (to which I am not greatly objected to) I would vote +1 :)

Paul

On 20-Jul-09, at 3:49 AM, Jason Birch wrote:

> Do I need to formalize this be re-submitting as a real motion?
>
> We're currently sitting at:
>
> +1: Tom, Bruce, Haris, Andy, Kenneth (and me)
> No great objection: Paul
> No comment: Bob
>
> How about this...  by end of day Monday (GMT -7), if nobody objects,  
> I'll treat the following as passed:
>
> "that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any  
> developer proposed by a member of the PSC (via an email to the  
> MapGuide-Internals mailing list) without the requirement of a vote.  
> Sandbox access can either be user-based or project-based based on  
> the stated needs."
>
> In the future, I'm going make an effort to distinguish better  
> between discussion and motion.
>
> Jason
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]
> ] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 10:58 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: [mapguide-internals] Motion RE Sandbox access?
>
> Given that we seem to have failed on the meeting thing this week, I  
> would like to get one of the items out of the way with a motion.
>
> Are there any great objections to me tabling a motion worded  
> something like:
>
> "that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any  
> developer proposed by a member of the PSC without the requirement of  
> a vote, and that said sandbox access can either be user-based or  
> project-based"
>
> ?
>
> Jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals_______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

__________________________________________

    Paul Spencer
    Chief Technology Officer
    DM Solutions Group Inc
    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Robert Bray-2]

+1 Bob - I think that is all of us with no objections and/or approval, so
motion passed. No need to resubmit as no one objects.

Bob

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jason Birch" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 1:49 AM
To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?

> Do I need to formalize this be re-submitting as a real motion?
>
> We're currently sitting at:
>
> +1: Tom, Bruce, Haris, Andy, Kenneth (and me)
> No great objection: Paul
> No comment: Bob
>
> How about this...  by end of day Monday (GMT -7), if nobody objects, I'll
> treat the following as passed:
>
> "that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any developer
> proposed by a member of the PSC (via an email to the MapGuide-Internals
> mailing list) without the requirement of a vote.  Sandbox access can
> either be user-based or project-based based on the stated needs."
>
> In the future, I'm going make an effort to distinguish better between
> discussion and motion.
>
> Jason
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: [hidden email]
> [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 10:58 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: [mapguide-internals] Motion RE Sandbox access?
>
> Given that we seem to have failed on the meeting thing this week, I would
> like to get one of the items out of the way with a motion.
>
> Are there any great objections to me tabling a motion worded something
> like:
>
> "that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any developer
> proposed by a member of the PSC without the requirement of a vote, and
> that said sandbox access can either be user-based or project-based"
>
> ?
>
> Jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals_______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals 

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Jason Birch]

Cool.

My first request on this one is setting up a sandbox for Haris to work on the MGRest stuff.  Given that he has commit rights, I'll leave this up to him to set up.

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Bray
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?

+1 Bob - I think that is all of us with no objections and/or approval, so
motion passed. No need to resubmit as no one objects.
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Robert Bray-2]

Should we appoint someone as the "sandbox" king? That person would be
responsible for looking after requests for setting up sandboxes.

Bob
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jason Birch" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:05 AM
To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?

> Cool.
>
> My first request on this one is setting up a sandbox for Haris to work on
> the MGRest stuff.  Given that he has commit rights, I'll leave this up to
> him to set up.
>
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Bray
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>
> +1 Bob - I think that is all of us with no objections and/or approval, so
> motion passed. No need to resubmit as no one objects.
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals 

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[zspitzer]

and maybe a wiki page explaining each sandbox and it's purpose/developers?

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Robert Bray<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Should we appoint someone as the "sandbox" king? That person would be
> responsible for looking after requests for setting up sandboxes.
>
> Bob
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Jason Birch" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:05 AM
> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>
>> Cool.
>>
>> My first request on this one is setting up a sandbox for Haris to work on
>> the MGRest stuff.  Given that he has commit rights, I'll leave this up to
>> him to set up.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Robert Bray
>> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>
>> +1 Bob - I think that is all of us with no objections and/or approval, so
>> motion passed. No need to resubmit as no one objects.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>

--
Zac Spitzer -
http://zacster.blogspot.com
[phone]
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Robert Bray-2]

Yes - that's a good idea too. Rather than have a Sandbox Keeper, we could
just allow any developer with commit rights to create one. They would
however be responsible for maintaining the information on the Wiki that
describes the sandbox.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Zac Spitzer" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:03 AM
To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?

> and maybe a wiki page explaining each sandbox and it's purpose/developers?
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Robert Bray<[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Should we appoint someone as the "sandbox" king? That person would be
>> responsible for looking after requests for setting up sandboxes.
>>
>> Bob
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Jason Birch" <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:05 AM
>> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
>> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>
>>> Cool.
>>>
>>> My first request on this one is setting up a sandbox for Haris to work
>>> on
>>> the MGRest stuff.  Given that he has commit rights, I'll leave this up
>>> to
>>> him to set up.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Robert Bray
>>> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:43 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>>
>>> +1 Bob - I think that is all of us with no objections and/or approval,
>>> so
>>> motion passed. No need to resubmit as no one objects.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Zac Spitzer -
> http://zacster.blogspot.com
> [phone]
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals 

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[zspitzer]

do we need some rules/guidelines like sandbox / (commits)
should be associated to a RFC or a ticket?

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Bray<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Yes - that's a good idea too. Rather than have a Sandbox Keeper, we could
> just allow any developer with commit rights to create one. They would
> however be responsible for maintaining the information on the Wiki that
> describes the sandbox.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Zac Spitzer" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:03 AM
> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>
>> and maybe a wiki page explaining each sandbox and it's purpose/developers?
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Robert Bray<[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Should we appoint someone as the "sandbox" king? That person would be
>>> responsible for looking after requests for setting up sandboxes.
>>>
>>> Bob
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: "Jason Birch" <[hidden email]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:05 AM
>>> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
>>> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>>
>>>> Cool.
>>>>
>>>> My first request on this one is setting up a sandbox for Haris to work
>>>> on
>>>> the MGRest stuff.  Given that he has commit rights, I'll leave this up
>>>> to
>>>> him to set up.
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Robert Bray
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:43 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>>>
>>>> +1 Bob - I think that is all of us with no objections and/or approval,
>>>> so
>>>> motion passed. No need to resubmit as no one objects.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Zac Spitzer -
>> http://zacster.blogspot.com
>> [phone]
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>

--
Zac Spitzer -
http://zacster.blogspot.com
[phone]
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Jason Birch]

I'd prefer this approach as well; don't really like the idea of adding bottlenecks.

So:
- PSC member updates wiki and notifies -internals of new sandbox
- PSC member creates sandbox if they have commit rights and feel comfortable doing it, otherwise finds a developer to do it for them

?  I do still want to have the oversight of having a PSC member involved.

Anything that is committed from a sandbox into trunk would require normal procedure (patch review, RFC, whatever).

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Robert Bray
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 8:03 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?

Yes - that's a good idea too. Rather than have a Sandbox Keeper, we could
just allow any developer with commit rights to create one. They would
however be responsible for maintaining the information on the Wiki that
describes the sandbox.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Zac Spitzer" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:03 AM
To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?

> and maybe a wiki page explaining each sandbox and it's purpose/developers?
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Robert Bray<[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Should we appoint someone as the "sandbox" king? That person would be
>> responsible for looking after requests for setting up sandboxes.
>>
>> Bob
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Jason Birch" <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:05 AM
>> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
>> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>
>>> Cool.
>>>
>>> My first request on this one is setting up a sandbox for Haris to work
>>> on
>>> the MGRest stuff.  Given that he has commit rights, I'll leave this up
>>> to
>>> him to set up.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Robert Bray
>>> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:43 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>>
>>> +1 Bob - I think that is all of us with no objections and/or approval,
>>> so
>>> motion passed. No need to resubmit as no one objects.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Zac Spitzer -
> http://zacster.blogspot.com
> [phone]
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals 

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Jason Birch]

Initial take on a sandbox page:

http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/Sandboxes

Jason
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Robert Bray-2]

Sandboxes are just that, a place to experiment. No need for RFC's or Tickets
for stuff submitted to them. However as Jason pointed out, when code is
promoted from Sandbox into the trunk or an official branch, then RFC's
and/or tickets are required.

Bob

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Zac Spitzer" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 9:19 AM
To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?

> do we need some rules/guidelines like sandbox / (commits)
> should be associated to a RFC or a ticket?
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Bray<[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Yes - that's a good idea too. Rather than have a Sandbox Keeper, we could
>> just allow any developer with commit rights to create one. They would
>> however be responsible for maintaining the information on the Wiki that
>> describes the sandbox.
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Zac Spitzer" <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:03 AM
>> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>
>>> and maybe a wiki page explaining each sandbox and it's
>>> purpose/developers?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Robert Bray<[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Should we appoint someone as the "sandbox" king? That person would be
>>>> responsible for looking after requests for setting up sandboxes.
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>> From: "Jason Birch" <[hidden email]>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:05 AM
>>>> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
>>>> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>>>
>>>>> Cool.
>>>>>
>>>>> My first request on this one is setting up a sandbox for Haris to work
>>>>> on
>>>>> the MGRest stuff.  Given that he has commit rights, I'll leave this up
>>>>> to
>>>>> him to set up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jason
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Robert Bray
>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:43 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 Bob - I think that is all of us with no objections and/or approval,
>>>>> so
>>>>> motion passed. No need to resubmit as no one objects.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Zac Spitzer -
>>> http://zacster.blogspot.com
>>> [phone]
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Zac Spitzer -
> http://zacster.blogspot.com
> [phone]
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals 

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S]

I agree with Bob and Jason.

I have updated the Sandbox page to include sandbox rules (and how to get
a sandbox).
Also, for each sandbox, the PSC name should be listed.
I am guessing that Bob is the assignee for the ADSK sandbox.

Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S



Robert Bray skrev:

> Sandboxes are just that, a place to experiment. No need for RFC's or
> Tickets for stuff submitted to them. However as Jason pointed out,
> when code is promoted from Sandbox into the trunk or an official
> branch, then RFC's and/or tickets are required.
>
> Bob
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Zac Spitzer" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 9:19 AM
> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>
>> do we need some rules/guidelines like sandbox / (commits)
>> should be associated to a RFC or a ticket?
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Bray<[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>> Yes - that's a good idea too. Rather than have a Sandbox Keeper, we
>>> could
>>> just allow any developer with commit rights to create one. They would
>>> however be responsible for maintaining the information on the Wiki that
>>> describes the sandbox.
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: "Zac Spitzer" <[hidden email]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:03 AM
>>> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
>>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>>
>>>> and maybe a wiki page explaining each sandbox and it's
>>>> purpose/developers?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Robert Bray<[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we appoint someone as the "sandbox" king? That person would be
>>>>> responsible for looking after requests for setting up sandboxes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>>> From: "Jason Birch" <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:05 AM
>>>>> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List"
>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cool.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My first request on this one is setting up a sandbox for Haris to
>>>>>> work
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> the MGRest stuff.  Given that he has commit rights, I'll leave
>>>>>> this up
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> him to set up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Robert Bray
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:43 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 Bob - I think that is all of us with no objections and/or
>>>>>> approval,
>>>>>> so
>>>>>> motion passed. No need to resubmit as no one objects.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Zac Spitzer -
>>>> http://zacster.blogspot.com
>>>> [phone]
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Zac Spitzer -
>> http://zacster.blogspot.com
>> [phone]
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals 
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Trevor Wekel]

Yep.  Looks good.  I fixed a typo on mapguide-internals and also added a comment about RFC/tickets as per Bob's discussion:

"Sandboxes do not require RFC's or tickets until the code is committed to trunk."

No tickets, no RFC's?  That's a hackers dream come true which may help speed development of new features.

Thanks,
Trevor
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:10 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?

I agree with Bob and Jason.

I have updated the Sandbox page to include sandbox rules (and how to get
a sandbox).
Also, for each sandbox, the PSC name should be listed.
I am guessing that Bob is the assignee for the ADSK sandbox.

Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S



Robert Bray skrev:

> Sandboxes are just that, a place to experiment. No need for RFC's or
> Tickets for stuff submitted to them. However as Jason pointed out,
> when code is promoted from Sandbox into the trunk or an official
> branch, then RFC's and/or tickets are required.
>
> Bob
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Zac Spitzer" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 9:19 AM
> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>
>> do we need some rules/guidelines like sandbox / (commits)
>> should be associated to a RFC or a ticket?
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Bray<[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>> Yes - that's a good idea too. Rather than have a Sandbox Keeper, we
>>> could
>>> just allow any developer with commit rights to create one. They would
>>> however be responsible for maintaining the information on the Wiki that
>>> describes the sandbox.
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: "Zac Spitzer" <[hidden email]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:03 AM
>>> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <[hidden email]>
>>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>>
>>>> and maybe a wiki page explaining each sandbox and it's
>>>> purpose/developers?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Robert Bray<[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we appoint someone as the "sandbox" king? That person would be
>>>>> responsible for looking after requests for setting up sandboxes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>>> From: "Jason Birch" <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:05 AM
>>>>> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List"
>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cool.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My first request on this one is setting up a sandbox for Haris to
>>>>>> work
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> the MGRest stuff.  Given that he has commit rights, I'll leave
>>>>>> this up
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> him to set up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Robert Bray
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:43 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 Bob - I think that is all of us with no objections and/or
>>>>>> approval,
>>>>>> so
>>>>>> motion passed. No need to resubmit as no one objects.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Zac Spitzer -
>>>> http://zacster.blogspot.com
>>>> [phone]
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Zac Spitzer -
>> http://zacster.blogspot.com
>> [phone]
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals 
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals


_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals