MapGuide RFC 71 for review

[Jackie Ng]

Hi All,

I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:

http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71

- Jackie

[Paul Spencer-2]

I think, to do a good job of this, the property pane should also be  
capable of highlighting a single result from the selection and zooming/
panning to a single result.  These are missing in the Fusion  
implementation but really should be there.

Paul

On 1-Jul-09, at 11:49 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:

>
> Hi All,
>
> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>
> - Jackie
> --
> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3193293.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

__________________________________________

    Paul Spencer
    Chief Technology Officer
    DM Solutions Group Inc
    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Jackie Ng]

By highlighting a single result, do you mean putting a second selection overlay on top of the existing one? Is this even possible?

- Jackie

Paul Spencer-2 wrote:

I think, to do a good job of this, the property pane should also be  
capable of highlighting a single result from the selection and zooming/
panning to a single result.  These are missing in the Fusion  
implementation but really should be there.

Paul

On 1-Jul-09, at 11:49 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:

>
> Hi All,
>
> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>
> - Jackie
> --
> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3193293.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals


__________________________________________

    Paul Spencer
    Chief Technology Officer
    DM Solutions Group Inc
    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Paul Spencer-2]

um, was thinking of OpenLayers vector layer which can draw the  
'current' feature client side which won't work for the ajax viewer  
unless the drawing API could handle it?

Anything else I can think of seems complicated ... it would be nice if  
you could take a selection and make it the data source for a temporary  
layer definition and classify the current feature differently from the  
others.

Maybe the mapguide devs could comment on how we might be able to do  
this.

Paul

On 2-Jul-09, at 8:46 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:

>
> By highlighting a single result, do you mean putting a second  
> selection
> overlay on top of the existing one? Is this even possible?
>
> - Jackie
>
>
> Paul Spencer-2 wrote:
>>
>> I think, to do a good job of this, the property pane should also be
>> capable of highlighting a single result from the selection and  
>> zooming/
>> panning to a single result.  These are missing in the Fusion
>> implementation but really should be there.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On 1-Jul-09, at 11:49 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>>>
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>>>
>>> - Jackie
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3193293.html
>>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________
>>
>>    Paul Spencer
>>    Chief Technology Officer
>>    DM Solutions Group Inc
>>    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3198759.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

__________________________________________

    Paul Spencer
    Chief Technology Officer
    DM Solutions Group Inc
    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S]

The space showing the selection info is fairly limited,
how will you deal with this?

Tree view?
Just scrollbars?
Other?

Would you consider supporting the correct order of the visible properties?

Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S



Jackie Ng skrev:
> Hi All,
>
> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>
> - Jackie
>  
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Jackie Ng]

For simplicity, we probably should just go with scrollbars. If content overflows, they can either scroll or vertically resize the Property Pane.

What do you mean by ordering? The layer definition xml only specifies visible properties as name/value pairs. There's no explicit ordering that I know of.

- Jackie

Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S wrote:

The space showing the selection info is fairly limited,
how will you deal with this?

Tree view?
Just scrollbars?
Other?

Would you consider supporting the correct order of the visible properties?

Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S



Jackie Ng skrev:
> Hi All,
>
> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>
> - Jackie
>  
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Jackie Ng]

It would be best if new js libraries weren't introduced if the existing infrastructure could handle such a thing.

- Jackie

Paul Spencer-2 wrote:

um, was thinking of OpenLayers vector layer which can draw the  
'current' feature client side which won't work for the ajax viewer  
unless the drawing API could handle it?

Anything else I can think of seems complicated ... it would be nice if  
you could take a selection and make it the data source for a temporary  
layer definition and classify the current feature differently from the  
others.

Maybe the mapguide devs could comment on how we might be able to do  
this.

Paul

On 2-Jul-09, at 8:46 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:

>
> By highlighting a single result, do you mean putting a second  
> selection
> overlay on top of the existing one? Is this even possible?
>
> - Jackie
>
>
> Paul Spencer-2 wrote:
>>
>> I think, to do a good job of this, the property pane should also be
>> capable of highlighting a single result from the selection and  
>> zooming/
>> panning to a single result.  These are missing in the Fusion
>> implementation but really should be there.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On 1-Jul-09, at 11:49 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>>>
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>>>
>>> - Jackie
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3193293.html
>>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________
>>
>>    Paul Spencer
>>    Chief Technology Officer
>>    DM Solutions Group Inc
>>    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3198759.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals


__________________________________________

    Paul Spencer
    Chief Technology Officer
    DM Solutions Group Inc
    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S]

The xml LayerDefinition name/value pairs are ordered.
Maestro supports setting this order, and it is preserved in MapGuide.
Not sure if Studio breaks it though.

Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S



Jackie Ng skrev:

> For simplicity, we probably should just go with scrollbars. If content
> overflows, they can either scroll or vertically resize the Property Pane.
>
> What do you mean by ordering? The layer definition xml only specifies
> visible properties as name/value pairs. There's no explicit ordering that I
> know of.
>
> - Jackie
>
>
> Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S wrote:
>  
>> The space showing the selection info is fairly limited,
>> how will you deal with this?
>>
>> Tree view?
>> Just scrollbars?
>> Other?
>>
>> Would you consider supporting the correct order of the visible properties?
>>
>> Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S
>>
>>
>>
>> Jackie Ng skrev:
>>    
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>>>
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>>>
>>> - Jackie
>>>  
>>>      
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>>
>>    
>
>  

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S]

It is definately possible to have temp layers that mark the current
selection.

However having to reload the map takes time, so it looks a bit clumsy.

It is possible to generate an extra runtime map, and produce a selection
overlay image from the extra map, which makes it faster, but it there is
still a
delay. And it is a bit complicated to keep track of the overlay(s).

Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S



Jackie Ng skrev:

> It would be best if new js libraries weren't introduced if the existing
> infrastructure could handle such a thing.
>
> - Jackie
>
>
> Paul Spencer-2 wrote:
>  
>> um, was thinking of OpenLayers vector layer which can draw the  
>> 'current' feature client side which won't work for the ajax viewer  
>> unless the drawing API could handle it?
>>
>> Anything else I can think of seems complicated ... it would be nice if  
>> you could take a selection and make it the data source for a temporary  
>> layer definition and classify the current feature differently from the  
>> others.
>>
>> Maybe the mapguide devs could comment on how we might be able to do  
>> this.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On 2-Jul-09, at 8:46 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:
>>
>>    
>>> By highlighting a single result, do you mean putting a second  
>>> selection
>>> overlay on top of the existing one? Is this even possible?
>>>
>>> - Jackie
>>>
>>>
>>> Paul Spencer-2 wrote:
>>>      
>>>> I think, to do a good job of this, the property pane should also be
>>>> capable of highlighting a single result from the selection and  
>>>> zooming/
>>>> panning to a single result.  These are missing in the Fusion
>>>> implementation but really should be there.
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>> On 1-Jul-09, at 11:49 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>>>>>
>>>>> - Jackie
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>> http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3193293.html
>>>>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>>>          
>>>> __________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>    Paul Spencer
>>>>    Chief Technology Officer
>>>>    DM Solutions Group Inc
>>>>    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3198759.html
>>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>      
>> __________________________________________
>>
>>     Paul Spencer
>>     Chief Technology Officer
>>     DM Solutions Group Inc
>>     http://research.dmsolutions.ca/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>>
>>    
>
>  

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Tom Fukushima]

This will be great!

The concern that I have is that for large selections (thousands of features), this could potentially cause the basic viewer to become substantially slower. Can we add the following requirements:
1) Whatever we do will not increase the time it takes to show the selection in the map? That is, the selection should show on the map first, then the generation of the property panel should be done asynchronously and the user should be able to do other operations while it is being generated.
2) If the properties panel is not visible, there will be no unrequired requests and processing for the properties panel (in client, web tier and server).

Thanks
Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jackie Ng
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:49 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [mapguide-internals] MapGuide RFC 71 for review


Hi All,

I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:

http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71

- Jackie
--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3193293.html
Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Jackie Ng]

How important is this capability?

My intentions with the RFC was for the Property Pane to achieve functional parity with the current Fusion implementation. Perhaps handling of sub-selections should be left for another RFC?

- Jackie

Paul Spencer-2 wrote:

I think, to do a good job of this, the property pane should also be  
capable of highlighting a single result from the selection and zooming/
panning to a single result.  These are missing in the Fusion  
implementation but really should be there.

Paul

On 1-Jul-09, at 11:49 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:

>
> Hi All,
>
> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>
> - Jackie
> --
> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3193293.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals


__________________________________________

    Paul Spencer
    Chief Technology Officer
    DM Solutions Group Inc
    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Jason Birch]

Zoom to record isn't too hard and doesn't require additional APIs, etc... Could we retain that? A multi-feature selection panel is pretty pointless without that capability.


----- Original Message -----
From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wed Jul 08 17:50:31 2009
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] MapGuide RFC 71 for review


How important is this capability?

My intentions with the RFC was for the Property Pane to achieve functional
parity with the current Fusion implementation. Perhaps handling of
sub-selections should be left for another RFC?

- Jackie


Paul Spencer-2 wrote:

>
> I think, to do a good job of this, the property pane should also be  
> capable of highlighting a single result from the selection and zooming/
> panning to a single result.  These are missing in the Fusion  
> implementation but really should be there.
>
> Paul
>
> On 1-Jul-09, at 11:49 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>>
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>>
>> - Jackie
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3193293.html
>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
>
> __________________________________________
>
>     Paul Spencer
>     Chief Technology Officer
>     DM Solutions Group Inc
>     http://research.dmsolutions.ca/
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3228903.html
Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Jackie Ng]

Yes that sounds easily doable.

It is the sub-selection highlighting where people seem to have wildly differing opinions on possible implementation. Without a consensus on a good implementation (because I did not scope this part for this RFC, and I we haven't heard any input yet from Autodesk devs on this part), I would prefer to leave this aspect for another RFC.

- Jackie

Jason Birch wrote:

Zoom to record isn't too hard and doesn't require additional APIs, etc... Could we retain that? A multi-feature selection panel is pretty pointless without that capability.


----- Original Message -----
From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wed Jul 08 17:50:31 2009
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] MapGuide RFC 71 for review


How important is this capability?

My intentions with the RFC was for the Property Pane to achieve functional
parity with the current Fusion implementation. Perhaps handling of
sub-selections should be left for another RFC?

- Jackie


Paul Spencer-2 wrote:
>
> I think, to do a good job of this, the property pane should also be  
> capable of highlighting a single result from the selection and zooming/
> panning to a single result.  These are missing in the Fusion  
> implementation but really should be there.
>
> Paul
>
> On 1-Jul-09, at 11:49 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>>
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>>
>> - Jackie
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3193293.html
>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
>
> __________________________________________
>
>     Paul Spencer
>     Chief Technology Officer
>     DM Solutions Group Inc
>     http://research.dmsolutions.ca/
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3228903.html
Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Paul Spencer-2]

Absolutely, leave it out - I just brought it up because it was a  
requested feature of the fusion selection panel and I thought I could  
get you to do the hard work of figuring out how to do it :)

Cheers

Paul

On 8-Jul-09, at 9:16 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:

>
> Yes that sounds easily doable.
>
> It is the sub-selection highlighting where people seem to have wildly
> differing opinions on possible implementation. Without a consensus  
> on a good
> implementation (because I did not scope this part for this RFC, and  
> I we
> haven't heard any input yet from Autodesk devs on this part), I  
> would prefer
> to leave this aspect for another RFC.
>
> - Jackie
>
>
> Jason Birch wrote:
>>
>> Zoom to record isn't too hard and doesn't require additional APIs,  
>> etc...
>> Could we retain that? A multi-feature selection panel is pretty  
>> pointless
>> without that capability.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: [hidden email]
>> <[hidden email]>
>> To: [hidden email]
>> <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Wed Jul 08 17:50:31 2009
>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] MapGuide RFC 71 for review
>>
>>
>> How important is this capability?
>>
>> My intentions with the RFC was for the Property Pane to achieve  
>> functional
>> parity with the current Fusion implementation. Perhaps handling of
>> sub-selections should be left for another RFC?
>>
>> - Jackie
>>
>>
>> Paul Spencer-2 wrote:
>>>
>>> I think, to do a good job of this, the property pane should also be
>>> capable of highlighting a single result from the selection and  
>>> zooming/
>>> panning to a single result.  These are missing in the Fusion
>>> implementation but really should be there.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> On 1-Jul-09, at 11:49 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>>>>
>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>>>>
>>>> - Jackie
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3193293.html
>>>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at  
>>>> Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________
>>>
>>>    Paul Spencer
>>>    Chief Technology Officer
>>>    DM Solutions Group Inc
>>>    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review- 
>> tp3193293p3228903.html
>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3228975.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

__________________________________________

    Paul Spencer
    Chief Technology Officer
    DM Solutions Group Inc
    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

[Jackie Ng]

Given the discussions so far, is the PSC ready to vote on this RFC?

- Jackie

Paul Spencer-2 wrote:

Absolutely, leave it out - I just brought it up because it was a  
requested feature of the fusion selection panel and I thought I could  
get you to do the hard work of figuring out how to do it :)

Cheers

Paul

On 8-Jul-09, at 9:16 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:

>
> Yes that sounds easily doable.
>
> It is the sub-selection highlighting where people seem to have wildly
> differing opinions on possible implementation. Without a consensus  
> on a good
> implementation (because I did not scope this part for this RFC, and  
> I we
> haven't heard any input yet from Autodesk devs on this part), I  
> would prefer
> to leave this aspect for another RFC.
>
> - Jackie
>
>
> Jason Birch wrote:
>>
>> Zoom to record isn't too hard and doesn't require additional APIs,  
>> etc...
>> Could we retain that? A multi-feature selection panel is pretty  
>> pointless
>> without that capability.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: [e-mail]
>> <[e-mail]>
>> To: [e-mail]
>> <[e-mail]>
>> Sent: Wed Jul 08 17:50:31 2009
>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] MapGuide RFC 71 for review
>>
>>
>> How important is this capability?
>>
>> My intentions with the RFC was for the Property Pane to achieve  
>> functional
>> parity with the current Fusion implementation. Perhaps handling of
>> sub-selections should be left for another RFC?
>>
>> - Jackie
>>
>>
>> Paul Spencer-2 wrote:
>>>
>>> I think, to do a good job of this, the property pane should also be
>>> capable of highlighting a single result from the selection and  
>>> zooming/
>>> panning to a single result.  These are missing in the Fusion
>>> implementation but really should be there.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> On 1-Jul-09, at 11:49 PM, Jackie Ng wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I've posted a new RFC for discussion/review:
>>>>
>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
>>>>
>>>> - Jackie
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3193293.html
>>>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at  
>>>> Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________
>>>
>>>    Paul Spencer
>>>    Chief Technology Officer
>>>    DM Solutions Group Inc
>>>    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review- 
>> tp3193293p3228903.html
>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-71-for-review-tp3193293p3228975.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals


__________________________________________

    Paul Spencer
    Chief Technology Officer
    DM Solutions Group Inc
    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals