Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (
why?)
I’m not sure I really have a
suggestion, other than adding native GUID support to FDO…
I see the argument on the
underlying providers, that at least makes sense. ESRI actually requires ‘{‘s
to be there when setting GUID fields (via strings!?) through ArcObjects. SQL I
believe uses something similar to a .NET Guid.ToString() function which leaves
off the braces.
|

|
chris erickson
developer
[hidden email]
970.493.9500 x
191
970.482.1485
(fax)
|
From:
[hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Orest
Halustchak
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:22 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: Guid length in various providers
Hi Chris,
There is no standard in FDO for this.
FDO doesn’t have its own GUID type and the two providers have dealt with the
types separately. But, I think these two providers follow the conventions of
the underlying servers. SQL Server Mgt Studio I think displays the unique
identifiers by default without braces whereas Arc desktop tools show them with
braces.
We probably could define a
convention for FDO if you have a suggestion.
Thanks,
Orest.
From:
[hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris
Erickson
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 6:53 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] Guid length in various providers
Hello,
I was noticing that between different providers, there is a
different printing of GUIDs.
For example, the SQLServerSpatial provider prints them to 36
characters strings without {} braces, whereas the ArcSDE provider prints them
to 38 characer strings with curly braces.
What is the ‘standard’ for FDO? Is there a plan to
‘natively’ support GUIDS in FDO?
|

|
chris erickson
developer
[hidden email]
970.493.9500 x
191
970.482.1485
(fax)
|
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals