I agree with Justin. We should not mandate a one-to-one correspondence,
because we have PMC members who may not wish to perform Jira admin
tasks, and reliable admins who may not be on the PMC (e.g. former PMC
members who stood down for membership balance reasons). I am comfortable
with the current arrangements, and support the occasional refreshment of
the despot list.
Kind regards,
Ben.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> I agree that the list should be refreshed but not sure if we need to
> stricly enforce a one to one with the PSC. Since our process allows
> people to step down to allow others to take part it could happen that a
> PSC member steps back but is still willing to do despot related tasks.
> But no strong feeling on this.
>
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> can I take 5 minutes of yours to look at the following list of
>> developers and despots as reported by codehaus?
>>
>>
http://xircles.codehaus.org/projects/geotools/members>>
>> The list is long, ok, what is more interesting is the current
>> despot set, which reflects on the ability to admin jira:
>> Jody Garnett
>> Martin Desriusseaux
>> Andrea Aime
>> Justin Deoliveira
>> James McGill
>> Gabriel Roldan
>> Jesse Eichar
>> Ian Turton
>> Hans Haggsrtom (a SOC student of one/two years ago...)
>>
>> I would say that the project despots should match 1-1
>> the PMC member list instead?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>
>
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <
[hidden email]>
Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining
Australian Resources Research Centre
26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geotools-administration mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-administration
