Below is an additional vote from Maciek.
I think that we can now consider this motion passed.
Markus, is it you who actually add the new SVN committers?
I agree with Hamish and Paul that we need to revisit RFC3.
maybe there should be a separate voting procedure for SVN access
with at least 50% members voting yes and then something more flexible
for implementation proposals - although given that most decisions
about development are done on dev list, whatever gets to the committee
is probably pretty serious and the procedure should ensure that at least
50% of the PSC members at least look at the proposal and vote
(even if it is just 0)
Thank you for voting
Helena
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Maciej Sieczka <
[hidden email]>
> Date: September 11, 2008 4:10:41 AM EDT
> To: Helena Mitasova <
[hidden email]>
> Cc: Paul Kelly <
[hidden email]>, Dylan Beaudette
> <
[hidden email]>, Massimiliano Cannata
> <
[hidden email]>, Brad Douglas
> <
[hidden email]>, Markus Neteler <
[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: Please vote on PSC motion: SVN access for Yann
>
> Helena Mitasova pisze:
>> I am aware that some of you are away, but if you have access to
>> email, please vote on the motion to grant SVN commit access to Yann -
>> please email your vote to
>>
[hidden email]
>> thank you very much, it would be great if we don't let this die
>> out because of one missing vote,
>
> Hi Helena,
>
> I've been having temporary problems with sending email from my email
> address under which I'm registered to various MLs, including GRASS
> PSC one.
>
> If you don't mind forwarding my email (I'm sending it from another
> account), please let Folks know that I'm all supportive for granting
> Yann SVN wite access. +1!
>
> Best,
> Maciek
>
> --
> Maciej Sieczka
> www.sieczka.org
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
