+1 Jason
2009/9/10 Greg Boone <greg.boone@autodesk.com>
> +1
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
> fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Haris Kurtagic
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 10, 2009 4:24 AM
> *To:* FDO Internals Mail List
> *Subject:* RE: [fdo-internals] RE: Motion: Vote on FDO RFC 41: Fetch Size
>
>
>
> +1 Haris
>
>
>
> *From:* fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
> fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Traian Stanev
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 09, 2009 19:31
> *To:* FDO Internals Mail List
> *Subject:* [fdo-internals] RE: Motion: Vote on FDO RFC 41: Fetch Size
>
>
>
> +1 Traian
>
>
>
> *From:* fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
> fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Greg Boone
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 09, 2009 10:08 AM
> *To:* FDO Internals Mail List
> *Subject:* [fdo-internals] Motion: Vote on FDO RFC 41: Fetch Size
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> There were no further comments on RFC 41:
>
http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc41 - Fetch Size.
>
>
>
> I would like to motion a vote to accept this RFC.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg.
>
> * *
>
>
>
> *From:* fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
> fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Orest Halustchak
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:34 AM
> *To:* FDO Internals Mail List
> *Subject:* [fdo-internals] RE: FDO RFC 41 is updated.
>
>
>
> Hi Leaf,
>
>
>
> Thanks for updating the RFC:
http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc41>
>
>
> Yes, we’ve hit some cases where we’d like to change fetch sizes from the
> application for performance reasons, depending on particular queries.
> Providers where this isn’t relevant can ignore these and other providers can
> be updated as needed. I hope that makes sense.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Orest.
>
>
>
> *From:* fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
> fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Leaf Li
> *Sent:* Monday, August 24, 2009 9:07 PM
> *To:* fdo-internals@lists.osgeo.org
> *Subject:* [fdo-internals] FDO RFC 41 is updated.
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> I just update provider implementation portion of FDO RFC 41 according to
> Traian’s feedback. Can you review it?
>
>
>
> The old version:
>
> SQLite will be enhanced to support it. Empty implementation will be added
> for other providers.
>
>
>
> The new version:
>
> Initially, we need this for our Autodesk providers and applications. An
> empty default implementation will be added so that this change will not
> materially affect other providers and does not entail work for people other
> than Autodesk. Other provider developers can add it and use it as needed.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Leaf Li
>
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals@lists.osgeo.org
>
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals>
>
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
