FDO 3.4.1 RC2

[Greg Boone]

Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (why?)

Hi All,

 

I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1 before the next release candidate is published?

 

Greg

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Chris Erickson-2]

Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (why?)

Does RC2 contain the long text field fixes in ArcSDE?  Do you know when it might be posted?

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:32 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Hi All,

 

I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1 before the next release candidate is published?

 

Greg

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Greg Boone]

Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (why?)

Yes, It will contain that fix. ETA is towards the end of the week. Thursday or Friday depends on requests for additional changes.

 

Greg

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Does RC2 contain the long text field fixes in ArcSDE?  Do you know when it might be posted?

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:32 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Hi All,

 

I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1 before the next release candidate is published?

 

Greg

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Jackie Ng]

Hi Greg,

I don't know if you had a look at this one, but there is a major defect with the enhanced IDescribeSchema command when used against any GenericRdbms provider, where it scrambles the input class name(s). This defect make the enhanced IDescribeSchema command unusable.

http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/ticket/552

- Jackie

Greg Boone wrote:

Hi All,

I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1 before the next release candidate is published?

Greg

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Greg Boone]

Jackie,

I ran the ODBC Describe Schema Test below and everything seemed fine. Send me the code for the test that you ran and I will see what I can find.


Output from Test:

OdbcAccessDescribeSchemaTest.describeWithClassNames (10/06/09 09:11:20):
Setting Current schema to be 'Fdo'
Current schema 'Fdo'
Current class 'Cities'
Current class 'VIEW1'

Test:

void OdbcAccessDescribeSchemaTest::describeWithClassNames()
{
    try
    {
        // call the static method
        FdoPtr<FdoIConnection> connection = UnitTestUtil::GetProviderConnectionObject();
        if (connection == NULL)
            CPPUNIT_FAIL("FAILED - CreateConnection returned NULL\n");

        // Now open the database with the given
        connection->SetConnectionString(GetConnectString());
        connection->Open();

        // Now analyse the schema with the mappings in place.
        // This is a modified version of DescribeSchemaTest::SchemaTest().
        FdoPtr<FdoIDescribeSchema> describeSchemaCmd =
            (FdoIDescribeSchema*)connection->CreateCommand(FdoCommandType_DescribeSchema);

          wprintf(L"Setting Current schema to be '%ls'\n", L"Fdo");
        describeSchemaCmd->SetSchemaName(L"Fdo");

        FdoPtr<FdoStringCollection> classNames = FdoStringCollection::Create();
        classNames->Add(L"Cities");
        classNames->Add(L"VIEW1");
        describeSchemaCmd->SetClassNames(classNames);
        FdoPtr<FdoFeatureSchemaCollection> schemas = describeSchemaCmd->Execute();

        if (schemas == NULL)
            CPPUNIT_FAIL("FAILED - DescribeSchema returned NULL collection\n");

        FdoInt32 numSchemas = schemas->GetCount();
        for (int i=0; i<numSchemas; i++)
        {
            FdoPtr<FdoFeatureSchema> schema = schemas->GetItem(i);

            FdoString* schemaName = schema->GetName();
                        wprintf(L"Current schema '%ls'\n", schemaName);
            FdoPtr<FdoClassCollection> classes = schema->GetClasses();

            FdoInt32 numClasses = classes->GetCount();
            CPPUNIT_ASSERT(numClasses == 2);
            for (int j=0; j<numClasses; j++)
            {
                // Note the assumption here that it is a feature class (it is set up so
                // in the test data).
                FdoPtr<FdoClassDefinition> classDef = classes->GetItem(j);

                // analyze the feature class
                FdoString* className = classDef->GetName();
    wprintf(L"Current class '%ls'\n", className);
            }
        }
    }
    catch (FdoException *ex)
    {
                TestCommonFail (ex);
    }

}



-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jackie Ng
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 6:52 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2


Hi Greg,

I don't know if you had a look at this one, but there is a major defect with
the enhanced IDescribeSchema command when used against any GenericRdbms
provider, where it scrambles the input class name(s). This defect make the
enhanced IDescribeSchema command unusable.

http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/ticket/552

- Jackie



Greg Boone wrote:

>
> Hi All,
>
> I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any
> outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting
> back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1
> before the next release candidate is published?
>
> Greg
>
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/FDO-3-4-1-RC2-tp3771453p3772133.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Jackie Ng]

Hi Greg,

I've attached the C# source to that ticket. (w/ updated details)

- Jackie

Greg Boone wrote:

Jackie,

I ran the ODBC Describe Schema Test below and everything seemed fine. Send me the code for the test that you ran and I will see what I can find.


Output from Test:

OdbcAccessDescribeSchemaTest.describeWithClassNames (10/06/09 09:11:20):
Setting Current schema to be 'Fdo'
Current schema 'Fdo'
Current class 'Cities'
Current class 'VIEW1'

Test:

void OdbcAccessDescribeSchemaTest::describeWithClassNames()
{
    try
    {
        // call the static method
        FdoPtr<FdoIConnection> connection = UnitTestUtil::GetProviderConnectionObject();
        if (connection == NULL)
            CPPUNIT_FAIL("FAILED - CreateConnection returned NULL\n");

        // Now open the database with the given
        connection->SetConnectionString(GetConnectString());
        connection->Open();

        // Now analyse the schema with the mappings in place.
        // This is a modified version of DescribeSchemaTest::SchemaTest().
        FdoPtr<FdoIDescribeSchema> describeSchemaCmd =
            (FdoIDescribeSchema*)connection->CreateCommand(FdoCommandType_DescribeSchema);

          wprintf(L"Setting Current schema to be '%ls'\n", L"Fdo");
        describeSchemaCmd->SetSchemaName(L"Fdo");

        FdoPtr<FdoStringCollection> classNames = FdoStringCollection::Create();
        classNames->Add(L"Cities");
        classNames->Add(L"VIEW1");
        describeSchemaCmd->SetClassNames(classNames);
        FdoPtr<FdoFeatureSchemaCollection> schemas = describeSchemaCmd->Execute();

        if (schemas == NULL)
            CPPUNIT_FAIL("FAILED - DescribeSchema returned NULL collection\n");

        FdoInt32 numSchemas = schemas->GetCount();
        for (int i=0; i<numSchemas; i++)
        {
            FdoPtr<FdoFeatureSchema> schema = schemas->GetItem(i);

            FdoString* schemaName = schema->GetName();
                        wprintf(L"Current schema '%ls'\n", schemaName);
            FdoPtr<FdoClassCollection> classes = schema->GetClasses();

            FdoInt32 numClasses = classes->GetCount();
            CPPUNIT_ASSERT(numClasses == 2);
            for (int j=0; j<numClasses; j++)
            {
                // Note the assumption here that it is a feature class (it is set up so
                // in the test data).
                FdoPtr<FdoClassDefinition> classDef = classes->GetItem(j);

                // analyze the feature class
                FdoString* className = classDef->GetName();
    wprintf(L"Current class '%ls'\n", className);
            }
        }
    }
    catch (FdoException *ex)
    {
                TestCommonFail (ex);
    }

}



-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Jackie Ng
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 6:52 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2


Hi Greg,

I don't know if you had a look at this one, but there is a major defect with
the enhanced IDescribeSchema command when used against any GenericRdbms
provider, where it scrambles the input class name(s). This defect make the
enhanced IDescribeSchema command unusable.

http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/ticket/552

- Jackie



Greg Boone wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any
> outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting
> back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1
> before the next release candidate is published?
>
> Greg
>
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/FDO-3-4-1-RC2-tp3771453p3772133.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Greg Boone]

OK... I have a fix for this. It will go into 3.4.1.

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jackie Ng
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:57 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2


Hi Greg,

I've attached the C# source to that ticket. (w/ updated details)

- Jackie


Greg Boone wrote:

>
> Jackie,
>
> I ran the ODBC Describe Schema Test below and everything seemed fine. Send
> me the code for the test that you ran and I will see what I can find.
>
>
> Output from Test:
>
> OdbcAccessDescribeSchemaTest.describeWithClassNames (10/06/09 09:11:20):
> Setting Current schema to be 'Fdo'
> Current schema 'Fdo'
> Current class 'Cities'
> Current class 'VIEW1'
>
> Test:
>
> void OdbcAccessDescribeSchemaTest::describeWithClassNames()
> {
>     try
>     {
>         // call the static method
>         FdoPtr<FdoIConnection> connection =
> UnitTestUtil::GetProviderConnectionObject();
>         if (connection == NULL)
>             CPPUNIT_FAIL("FAILED - CreateConnection returned NULL\n");
>
>         // Now open the database with the given
>         connection->SetConnectionString(GetConnectString());
>         connection->Open();
>
>         // Now analyse the schema with the mappings in place.
>         // This is a modified version of DescribeSchemaTest::SchemaTest().
>         FdoPtr<FdoIDescribeSchema> describeSchemaCmd =
>            
> (FdoIDescribeSchema*)connection->CreateCommand(FdoCommandType_DescribeSchema);
>
>  wprintf(L"Setting Current schema to be '%ls'\n", L"Fdo");
>         describeSchemaCmd->SetSchemaName(L"Fdo");
>
>         FdoPtr<FdoStringCollection> classNames =
> FdoStringCollection::Create();
>         classNames->Add(L"Cities");
>         classNames->Add(L"VIEW1");
>         describeSchemaCmd->SetClassNames(classNames);
>         FdoPtr<FdoFeatureSchemaCollection> schemas =
> describeSchemaCmd->Execute();
>
>         if (schemas == NULL)
>             CPPUNIT_FAIL("FAILED - DescribeSchema returned NULL
> collection\n");
>
>         FdoInt32 numSchemas = schemas->GetCount();
>         for (int i=0; i<numSchemas; i++)
>         {
>             FdoPtr<FdoFeatureSchema> schema = schemas->GetItem(i);
>
>             FdoString* schemaName = schema->GetName();
> wprintf(L"Current schema '%ls'\n", schemaName);
>             FdoPtr<FdoClassCollection> classes = schema->GetClasses();
>
>             FdoInt32 numClasses = classes->GetCount();
>             CPPUNIT_ASSERT(numClasses == 2);
>             for (int j=0; j<numClasses; j++)
>             {
>                 // Note the assumption here that it is a feature class (it
> is set up so
>                 // in the test data).
>                 FdoPtr<FdoClassDefinition> classDef = classes->GetItem(j);
>
>                 // analyze the feature class
>                 FdoString* className = classDef->GetName();
>     wprintf(L"Current class '%ls'\n", className);
>             }
>         }
>     }
>     catch (FdoException *ex)
>     {
> TestCommonFail (ex);
>     }
>
> }
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jackie Ng
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 6:52 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> I don't know if you had a look at this one, but there is a major defect
> with
> the enhanced IDescribeSchema command when used against any GenericRdbms
> provider, where it scrambles the input class name(s). This defect make the
> enhanced IDescribeSchema command unusable.
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/ticket/552
>
> - Jackie
>
>
>
> Greg Boone wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any
>> outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting
>> back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1
>> before the next release candidate is published?
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> fdo-internals mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n2.nabble.com/FDO-3-4-1-RC2-tp3771453p3772133.html
> Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/FDO-3-4-1-RC2-tp3771453p3775178.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Chris Erickson-2]

Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (why?)

Is there any update on the timeline for RC2?

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:39 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Yes, It will contain that fix. ETA is towards the end of the week. Thursday or Friday depends on requests for additional changes.

 

Greg

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Does RC2 contain the long text field fixes in ArcSDE?  Do you know when it might be posted?

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:32 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Hi All,

 

I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1 before the next release candidate is published?

 

Greg

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Greg Boone]

Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (why?)

The second RC has been delayed. I have no ETA on the release of the RC at this time.

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 10:35 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Is there any update on the timeline for RC2?

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:39 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Yes, It will contain that fix. ETA is towards the end of the week. Thursday or Friday depends on requests for additional changes.

 

Greg

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Does RC2 contain the long text field fixes in ArcSDE?  Do you know when it might be posted?

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:32 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Hi All,

 

I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1 before the next release candidate is published?

 

Greg

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Chris Erickson-2]

Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (why?)

Is there a fundamental reason why?  We may build the fdo provider and go with RC1 on our own, but would like to know if there are big underlying problems…

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 12:14 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

The second RC has been delayed. I have no ETA on the release of the RC at this time.

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 10:35 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Is there any update on the timeline for RC2?

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:39 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Yes, It will contain that fix. ETA is towards the end of the week. Thursday or Friday depends on requests for additional changes.

 

Greg

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Does RC2 contain the long text field fixes in ArcSDE?  Do you know when it might be posted?

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:32 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Hi All,

 

I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1 before the next release candidate is published?

 

Greg

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Greg Boone]

Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (why?)

At current the build release process is not fully automated. I may not have the cycles to produce a build for the next week or so.

 

Greg

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:00 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Is there a fundamental reason why?  We may build the fdo provider and go with RC1 on our own, but would like to know if there are big underlying problems…

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 12:14 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

The second RC has been delayed. I have no ETA on the release of the RC at this time.

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 10:35 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Is there any update on the timeline for RC2?

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:39 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Yes, It will contain that fix. ETA is towards the end of the week. Thursday or Friday depends on requests for additional changes.

 

Greg

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Does RC2 contain the long text field fixes in ArcSDE?  Do you know when it might be posted?

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:32 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Hi All,

 

I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1 before the next release candidate is published?

 

Greg

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Greg Boone]

Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (why?)

Hi All,

 

FDO 3.4.1 RC2 has been posted to

 

http://fdo.osgeo.org/content/fdo-341-downloads

 

Please take a look and if there are issue, let me know.

 

Greg

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:17 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

At current the build release process is not fully automated. I may not have the cycles to produce a build for the next week or so.

 

Greg

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:00 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Is there a fundamental reason why?  We may build the fdo provider and go with RC1 on our own, but would like to know if there are big underlying problems…

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 12:14 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

The second RC has been delayed. I have no ETA on the release of the RC at this time.

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 10:35 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Is there any update on the timeline for RC2?

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:39 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Yes, It will contain that fix. ETA is towards the end of the week. Thursday or Friday depends on requests for additional changes.

 

Greg

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Does RC2 contain the long text field fixes in ArcSDE?  Do you know when it might be posted?

 

chris erickson developer [hidden email] 970.493.9500 x 191 970.482.1485 (fax)

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:32 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2

 

Hi All,

 

I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1 before the next release candidate is published?

 

Greg

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Crispin_at_1Spatial]

Hi,

I notice that the last KingOra submission looks like it ties in with KO 0.8.8
http://www.sl-king.com/fdooracle/fdooracle.html

There have been a couple of KO releases since then - Haris, is it possible to get the 0.8.9 and 0.8.10 changes in to 3.4.1 before the final release so there is a consistent version between the OSGeo builds downloads on SL-King?

Greg Boone wrote:

Hi All,

FDO 3.4.1 RC2 has been posted to

http://fdo.osgeo.org/content/fdo-341-downloads

Please take a look and if there are issue, let me know.

Greg

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:17 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

At current the build release process is not fully automated. I may not have the cycles to produce a build for the next week or so.

Greg

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:00 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

Is there a fundamental reason why?  We may build the fdo provider and go with RC1 on our own, but would like to know if there are big underlying problems...

[cid:[e-mail]304DA0]<http://www.cartopac.com/>

chris erickson
developer
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
970.493.9500 x 191
970.482.1485 (fax)



From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 12:14 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

The second RC has been delayed. I have no ETA on the release of the RC at this time.

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 10:35 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

Is there any update on the timeline for RC2?

[cid:[e-mail]304DA0]<http://www.cartopac.com/>

chris erickson
developer
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
970.493.9500 x 191
970.482.1485 (fax)



From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:39 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

Yes, It will contain that fix. ETA is towards the end of the week. Thursday or Friday depends on requests for additional changes.

Greg

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2

Does RC2 contain the long text field fixes in ArcSDE?  Do you know when it might be posted?

[cid:[e-mail]304DA0]<http://www.cartopac.com/>

chris erickson
developer
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
970.493.9500 x 191
970.482.1485 (fax)



From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:32 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2

Hi All,

I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1 before the next release candidate is published?

Greg

 
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Haris Kurtagic]

0.8.9 and 0.8.10 already include direct SDE support.
So if I submit it will be together with changes for direct SDE RFC.
I can do that ?

Haris

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
Crispin_at_1Spatial
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 10:47 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2 -- KingOra Version


Hi,

I notice that the last KingOra submission looks like it ties in with KO
0.8.8
http://www.sl-king.com/fdooracle/fdooracle.html
http://www.sl-king.com/fdooracle/fdooracle.html 

There have been a couple of KO releases since then - Haris, is it possible
to get the 0.8.9 and 0.8.10 changes in to 3.4.1 before the final release so
there is a consistent version between the OSGeo builds downloads on SL-King?



Greg Boone wrote:

>
> Hi All,
>
> FDO 3.4.1 RC2 has been posted to
>
> http://fdo.osgeo.org/content/fdo-341-downloads
>
> Please take a look and if there are issue, let me know.
>
> Greg
>
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:17 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> At current the build release process is not fully automated. I may not
> have the cycles to produce a build for the next week or so.
>
> Greg
>
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:00 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> Is there a fundamental reason why?  We may build the fdo provider and go
> with RC1 on our own, but would like to know if there are big underlying
> problems...
>
> [cid:[hidden email]]<http://www.cartopac.com/>
>
> chris erickson
> developer
> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
> 970.493.9500 x 191
> 970.482.1485 (fax)
>
>
>
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 12:14 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> The second RC has been delayed. I have no ETA on the release of the RC at
> this time.
>
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 10:35 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> Is there any update on the timeline for RC2?
>
> [cid:[hidden email]]<http://www.cartopac.com/>
>
> chris erickson
> developer
> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
> 970.493.9500 x 191
> 970.482.1485 (fax)
>
>
>
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:39 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> Yes, It will contain that fix. ETA is towards the end of the week.
> Thursday or Friday depends on requests for additional changes.
>
> Greg
>
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:35 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> Does RC2 contain the long text field fixes in ArcSDE?  Do you know when it
> might be posted?
>
> [cid:[hidden email]]<http://www.cartopac.com/>
>
> chris erickson
> developer
> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
> 970.493.9500 x 191
> 970.482.1485 (fax)
>
>
>
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:32 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any
> outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting
> back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1
> before the next release candidate is published?
>
> Greg
>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>
>

--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/FDO-3-4-1-RC2-tp3771453p3967609.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[Crispin_at_1Spatial]

>> 0.8.9 and 0.8.10 already include direct SDE support.

I guess I was just thinking the two issues you describe on your site (NULL metadata and connection type) could be as partial individual file submissions.

If we could get RFC 42 to be assigned a guide and voted on I don't mind the submission to trunk - notwithstanding the two small(?) outstanding
I think the assignment/approval/voting timeline may prohibit this.

And, strictly RFC42 is a new feature that should not come in at the RC build level.

 Crispin

 

Haris Kurtagic wrote:

0.8.9 and 0.8.10 already include direct SDE support.
So if I submit it will be together with changes for direct SDE RFC.
I can do that ?

Haris

-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail]
[mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
Crispin_at_1Spatial
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 10:47 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2 -- KingOra Version


Hi,

I notice that the last KingOra submission looks like it ties in with KO
0.8.8
http://www.sl-king.com/fdooracle/fdooracle.html
http://www.sl-king.com/fdooracle/fdooracle.html 

There have been a couple of KO releases since then - Haris, is it possible
to get the 0.8.9 and 0.8.10 changes in to 3.4.1 before the final release so
there is a consistent version between the OSGeo builds downloads on SL-King?



Greg Boone wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> FDO 3.4.1 RC2 has been posted to
>
> http://fdo.osgeo.org/content/fdo-341-downloads
>
> Please take a look and if there are issue, let me know.
>
> Greg
>
> From: [e-mail]
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:17 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> At current the build release process is not fully automated. I may not
> have the cycles to produce a build for the next week or so.
>
> Greg
>
> From: [e-mail]
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:00 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> Is there a fundamental reason why?  We may build the fdo provider and go
> with RC1 on our own, but would like to know if there are big underlying
> problems...
>
> [cid:[e-mail]304DA0]<http://www.cartopac.com/>
>
> chris erickson
> developer
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> 970.493.9500 x 191
> 970.482.1485 (fax)
>
>
>
> From: [e-mail]
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 12:14 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> The second RC has been delayed. I have no ETA on the release of the RC at
> this time.
>
> From: [e-mail]
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 10:35 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> Is there any update on the timeline for RC2?
>
> [cid:[e-mail]304DA0]<http://www.cartopac.com/>
>
> chris erickson
> developer
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> 970.493.9500 x 191
> 970.482.1485 (fax)
>
>
>
> From: [e-mail]
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:39 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> Yes, It will contain that fix. ETA is towards the end of the week.
> Thursday or Friday depends on requests for additional changes.
>
> Greg
>
> From: [e-mail]
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Chris Erickson
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:35 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> Does RC2 contain the long text field fixes in ArcSDE?  Do you know when it
> might be posted?
>
> [cid:[e-mail]304DA0]<http://www.cartopac.com/>
>
> chris erickson
> developer
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> 970.493.9500 x 191
> 970.482.1485 (fax)
>
>
>
> From: [e-mail]
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:32 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any
> outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting
> back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1
> before the next release candidate is published?
>
> Greg
>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>
>

--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/FDO-3-4-1-RC2-tp3771453p3967609.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals