|
|
|
|
Tim Knapp
()
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Hi Daniel et al,
I've recently been developing a Plone theme with collective.skinny[1]. On the package page on pypi it says: <quote> The better way is to use it as a library and extend it with your own package. When doing so, you'll probably want to start out by subclassing and overriding through ZCML the main view, which lives in main.Main. Look at the configure.zcml file for pointers. </quote> I did do this but the problem is that the modules refer to the packages local 'templates' dir and therefore I found that you need to pretty much copy across all the code in the collective.skinny package for it to work. I've had other issues too, when subclassing the modules and I've found copying and pasting the code across has fixed these too. What is the correct way to subclass the collective.skinny package? I also created my own IPublicLayer interface in my package as I'm planning to have 3 collective.skinny-based packages in the same zope instance and thought this was the only way for this to work - is that right? Thanks, Tim [1] http://pypi.python.org/pypi/collective.skinny _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Daniel Nouri
()
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Hi Tim!
Tim Knapp writes: > I've recently been developing a Plone theme with collective.skinny[1]. > On the package page on pypi it says: > <quote> > The better way is to use it as a library and extend it with your own > package. When doing so, you'll probably want to start out by subclassing > and overriding through ZCML the main view, which lives in main.Main. > Look at the configure.zcml file for pointers. > </quote> > > I did do this but the problem is that the modules refer to the packages > local 'templates' dir and therefore I found that you need to pretty much > copy across all the code in the collective.skinny package for it to > work. I've had other issues too, when subclassing the modules and I've > found copying and pasting the code across has fixed these too. What is > the correct way to subclass the collective.skinny package? The "use as a library" story is really unfinished. I should remove that paragraph until I get to put some work into this to make it work smooth, and usable from a ZopeSkel template. Sorry for misleading you. fRiSi ran into the same problem recently. In the meantime, I suggest you use the whole collective.skinny as a template. Not so much code after all. > I also created my own IPublicLayer interface in my package as I'm > planning to have 3 collective.skinny-based packages in the same zope > instance and thought this was the only way for this to work - is that > right? Yes, you'll need three different interfaces. I realize that this contradicts also the paragraph that you quote before: "... overriding through ZCML the main view...". > [1] http://pypi.python.org/pypi/collective.skinny -- http://danielnouri.org _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Tim Knapp
()
|
|
||||||||||||
|
In reply to this post
by Tim Knapp
Further questions re. developing themes with collective.skinny:
It seems to me that you can't override cmf templates via collective.skinny? I've had to do quite a bit of workarounds to get simple things like 'search', 'navigation', 'sitemap' going. I think in the main things like this should really work OOTB otherwise you end up fighting against the 'framework' too much :( Thanks, Tim On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 06:56 +1200, Tim Knapp wrote: > Hi Daniel et al, > > I've recently been developing a Plone theme with collective.skinny[1]. > On the package page on pypi it says: > <quote> > The better way is to use it as a library and extend it with your own > package. When doing so, you'll probably want to start out by subclassing > and overriding through ZCML the main view, which lives in main.Main. > Look at the configure.zcml file for pointers. > </quote> > > I did do this but the problem is that the modules refer to the packages > local 'templates' dir and therefore I found that you need to pretty much > copy across all the code in the collective.skinny package for it to > work. I've had other issues too, when subclassing the modules and I've > found copying and pasting the code across has fixed these too. What is > the correct way to subclass the collective.skinny package? > > I also created my own IPublicLayer interface in my package as I'm > planning to have 3 collective.skinny-based packages in the same zope > instance and thought this was the only way for this to work - is that > right? > > Thanks, > Tim > > [1] http://pypi.python.org/pypi/collective.skinny > > > _______________________________________________ > UI mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Daniel Nouri
()
|
|
||||||||||||
|
We talked a bit about this on IRC. Let me answer to this thread, too.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Tim Knapp <[hidden email]> wrote: > Further questions re. developing themes with collective.skinny: > It seems to me that you can't override cmf templates via > collective.skinny? > > I've had to do quite a bit of workarounds to get simple things like > 'search', 'navigation', 'sitemap' going. I think in the main things like > this should really work OOTB otherwise you end up fighting against the > 'framework' too much :( You should be able to register views and call them just fine. For your view class, you'll want to inherit from the Main class and set a page template as the "render_content" attribute. Therein, you can render whatever template you want to see in the "content area" of your skin, like a search widget. The way I use Skinny is for skins that don't have anything in common with the Plone interface. The Plone UI is what we call the editing interface. That is, we have a custom public view for all our content types, and we also implement search by ourselves -- just because it works very different to the search in the editing interface. Despite that, there's nothing that keeps you from using macros out of Plone templates in Skinny -- but maybe they'll need a bit more context; like provided by @@plone's globalize. You can also use Plone's full API, like the queryCatalog script. fRiSi and I want to split collective.skinny into a library package and an example package, the latter will have example implementations for the most common things like search and sitemap, as well as the demo skin that's now in Skinny itself. Daniel _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Tim Knapp
()
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Hi Daniel,
Thanks a lot for the clarification on this. I actually worked out the fact that I can use any 'stuff' in the acquisition chain after I sent this email (bit dense I guess ;). I had also gathered things need to go through the 'main.Main' view class but thanks a lot for the clarification on the 'render_content' attribute, very helpful. (As discussed on #plone) I've developed a couple of fairly involved collective.skinny themes now and will post a message to the mailing list/my blog when they're live as well as my 'war stories' :) Here's some interesting figures from ab for a collective.skinny theme VS a standard plone site: Standard Plone: Requests per second: 3.27 [#/sec] (mean) collective.skinny theme (with some heavy customisation): Requests per second: 7.46 [#/sec] (mean) Another collective.skinny theme (simple brochureware site): Requests per second: 12.23 [#/sec] (mean) Thanks again for an excellent package! -Tim On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 21:28 +0100, Daniel Nouri wrote: > We talked a bit about this on IRC. Let me answer to this thread, too. > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Tim Knapp <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Further questions re. developing themes with collective.skinny: > > It seems to me that you can't override cmf templates via > > collective.skinny? > > > > I've had to do quite a bit of workarounds to get simple things like > > 'search', 'navigation', 'sitemap' going. I think in the main things like > > this should really work OOTB otherwise you end up fighting against the > > 'framework' too much :( > > You should be able to register views and call them just fine. For > your view class, you'll want to inherit from the Main class and set a > page template as the "render_content" attribute. Therein, you can > render whatever template you want to see in the "content area" of your > skin, like a search widget. > > The way I use Skinny is for skins that don't have anything in common > with the Plone interface. The Plone UI is what we call the editing > interface. That is, we have a custom public view for all our content > types, and we also implement search by ourselves -- just because it > works very different to the search in the editing interface. Despite > that, there's nothing that keeps you from using macros out of Plone > templates in Skinny -- but maybe they'll need a bit more context; like > provided by @@plone's globalize. You can also use Plone's full API, > like the queryCatalog script. > > fRiSi and I want to split collective.skinny into a library package and > an example package, the latter will have example implementations for > the most common things like search and sitemap, as well as the demo > skin that's now in Skinny itself. > > Daniel _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Espen Moe-Nilssen
()
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (why?)
I havent tried this product yet, so maybe this is a stupid question: 1) A page that uses collective.skinny shows/loads much faster than a "normal page" 2) If 1) is the case, is there any way to "port" an existing theme or is it "buildt from bottom up"? Den 4. mai. 2009 kl. 23.57 skrev Tim Knapp:
_______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Tim Knapp
()
|
|
||||||||||||
|
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 09:23 +0200, Espen Moe-Nilssen wrote:
> I havent tried this product yet, so maybe this is a stupid question: > > > 1) A page that uses collective.skinny shows/loads much faster than a > "normal page" > 2) If 1) is the case, is there any way to "port" an existing theme or > is it "buildt from bottom up"? > Needs to be built from the ground up unfortunately but if you've got the standard html/css from a graphics designer its as easy as copying and pasting it in. I created a collective.skinny-based theme this way in under half a day. I know others have had similar experiences. Thanks, Tim > > > Den 4. mai. 2009 kl. 23.57 skrev Tim Knapp: > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the clarification on this. I actually worked out > > the > > fact that I can use any 'stuff' in the acquisition chain after I > > sent > > this email (bit dense I guess ;). I had also gathered things need to > > go > > through the 'main.Main' view class but thanks a lot for the > > clarification on the 'render_content' attribute, very helpful. (As > > discussed on #plone) I've developed a couple of fairly involved > > collective.skinny themes now and will post a message to the mailing > > list/my blog when they're live as well as my 'war stories' :) > > > > > > > > > > Here's some interesting figures from ab for a collective.skinny > > theme VS > > a standard plone site: > > > > > > Standard Plone: > > Requests per second: 3.27 [#/sec] (mean) > > > > > > collective.skinny theme (with some heavy customisation): > > Requests per second: 7.46 [#/sec] (mean) > > > > > > Another collective.skinny theme (simple brochureware site): > > Requests per second: 12.23 [#/sec] (mean) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks again for an excellent package! > > > > > > -Tim > > > > > > On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 21:28 +0100, Daniel Nouri wrote: > > > We talked a bit about this on IRC. Let me answer to this thread, > > > too. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Tim Knapp <[hidden email]> > > > wrote: > > > > Further questions re. developing themes with collective.skinny: > > > > It seems to me that you can't override cmf templates via > > > > collective.skinny? > > > > > > > > > > > > I've had to do quite a bit of workarounds to get simple things > > > > like > > > > 'search', 'navigation', 'sitemap' going. I think in the main > > > > things like > > > > this should really work OOTB otherwise you end up fighting > > > > against the > > > > 'framework' too much :( > > > > > > > > > You should be able to register views and call them just fine. For > > > your view class, you'll want to inherit from the Main class and > > > set a > > > page template as the "render_content" attribute. Therein, you can > > > render whatever template you want to see in the "content area" of > > > your > > > skin, like a search widget. > > > > > > > > > The way I use Skinny is for skins that don't have anything in > > > common > > > with the Plone interface. The Plone UI is what we call the > > > editing > > > interface. That is, we have a custom public view for all our > > > content > > > types, and we also implement search by ourselves -- just because > > > it > > > works very different to the search in the editing interface. > > > Despite > > > that, there's nothing that keeps you from using macros out of > > > Plone > > > templates in Skinny -- but maybe they'll need a bit more context; > > > like > > > provided by @@plone's globalize. You can also use Plone's full > > > API, > > > like the queryCatalog script. > > > > > > > > > fRiSi and I want to split collective.skinny into a library package > > > and > > > an example package, the latter will have example implementations > > > for > > > the most common things like search and sitemap, as well as the > > > demo > > > skin that's now in Skinny itself. > > > > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > UI mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/ui > _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Espen Moe-Nilssen
()
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (why?)
Probably another stupid question: Is it possible to base it (partly) on another skin? or just "add" the .css files from another skin? (this is how I have made the subskins-preset themes (that for some reason have disappeared from plone.org, will try to add them back) Espen Moe-Nilssen _______________________________________________ Subskins III , build your own theme for Plone Den 5. mai. 2009 kl. 10.38 skrev Tim Knapp:
_______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Daniel Nouri
()
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Espen Moe-Nilssen writes:
> Probably another stupid question: > > Is it possible to base it (partly) on another skin? > > or just "add" the .css files from another skin? > > (this is how I have made the subskins-preset themes (that for some > reason have disappeared from plone.org, will try to add them back) If you mean is it possible to base it on a Plone skin? You could reuse CSS files from Plone if you wanted to. You just add them to `templates/head.pt`. But if I understand you right, you want to make a main theme and allow varieties thereof, like in Subskins III, yes? I imagine you could make a Plone control panel that allows to configure conditions for inclusion of CSS files into `head.pt`, based on where you're in. Or better, you use classes on the <body> for your individual sections, and make that configurable if that's what you want to do. -- http://danielnouri.org _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
||||||||||||||
| Free Embeddable Forum Powered by Nabble | Help |