Boolean Validators in Scripting, and GSoC2010 inquiry
|
|
John Martin Goddard
|
Hello Dan, James, everyone,
I'm investigating the use of the BoolValidator, for setting/getting Mute/Solo status, and it appears I use single char strings "y" or "n", and not "True", or "true", "False", etc. Is this the case? (Dan, I recall you asking whether the status return would be "y/n", and I suspect this may be the reason). Regarding Google Summer of Code 2010, do you think my voice command/control application might fit in? I believe I'd meet the criteria to be considered for GSoC2010, I'm in grad school, and this project is a big part of my Thesis. I wonder whether I'd be disqualified because my program is Windows only (at the moment), and relies heavily on the .NET toolbox. I suppose if I get my Thesis finished and accepted, I could propose a port to Linux. Also, since it's a stand-alone program utilizing the scripting IAC interface, maybe the project could be applied for independently of the core focus of Audacity development. Any advice here would be greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Marty Goddard ________________________________________ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 10:21 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: audacity-devel Digest, Vol 42, Issue 120 Send audacity-devel mailing list submissions to [hidden email] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [hidden email] You can reach the person managing the list at [hidden email] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of audacity-devel digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Focus Problem (Renan Moura Ferreira) 2. Track group definition (Al Dimond) 3. CVS write access (Al Dimond). (James Crook) 4. Re: CVS write access (Al Dimond). (James Crook) 5. Re: Track group definition (James Crook) 6. GSoC 2010 planning (James Crook) 7. Re: bug: too many new project windows crashes Audacity (Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman) 8. current compiling instructions on wiki (Ed Musgrove) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:42:11 +0000 From: Renan Moura Ferreira <[hidden email]> Subject: [Audacity-devel] Focus Problem To: <[hidden email]> Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I'm integrating a text editor to audacity's interface and it's working properly, but I'm having a problema with the focus in my wxRichTextCtrl component. When I type something in the wxRichTextCtrl, it affects the toolbars of audacity. Could anyone tell me how to solve it, I mean, how I keep the focus in the text editor and kill it in the rest of the application. I'm sending the modifications I did in Project.cpp to integrate the text editor. -------------- Renan Moura _________________________________________________________________ Voc? sabia que com o Hotmail voc? tem espa?o ilimitado para guardar seus e-mails? Come?e a usar j?! http://www.microsoft.com/brasil/windows/windowslive/products/hotmail.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: modifications.txt ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:59:55 -0600 From: Al Dimond <[hidden email]> Subject: [Audacity-devel] Track group definition To: [hidden email] Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" In an off-list discussion with Gale A. and Bill W., Bill mentioned that the manual defines a track group as any positive number of wave tracks followed by any positive number of label tracks. Gale said that this is the definition agreed to by all developers when track groups and linking were introduced. However, currently in the code this definition is never used, as far as I can tell. It's always any number of wave tracks followed by exactly one label track. Any further wave tracks are on their own. For the most part, we could move to the definition stated in the manual by changing TrackGroupIterator and TrackAndGroupIterator. I know of at least a few other areas that would need attention: just about all the Clear, Cut, and Paste functions would at least need a look, and the Repeat effect would need minor changes. I'm sure I'm missing a few things. On the other hand, we could leave the code how it is and change the manual. I'd rather change the manual at this point, but, you know, I'm just this guy that drops a lot of patches on your heads. Does anyone have thoughts or opinions on this? - Al ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:01:43 +0000 From: James Crook <[hidden email]> Subject: [Audacity-devel] CVS write access (Al Dimond). To: Al Dimond <[hidden email]> Cc: [hidden email] Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Hi Al, We (Audacity) would like to give you CVS write access. Please can you send me your sourceforge user id? Initially please keep check ins to ones which you have high confidence are the right way forward. If you have reservations about what the change does, chances are those aspects need more discussion first. I'll try to be responsive to questions etc, and I'll be keeping an eye on the CVS check in logs. --James (on behalf of 'the technical council'). ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:25:34 +0000 From: James Crook <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Audacity-devel] CVS write access (Al Dimond). To: Al Dimond <[hidden email]> Cc: [hidden email] Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Thanks for sending your sf id. CVS access is now enabled for you. Welcome on board. --James. James Crook wrote: > Hi Al, > > We (Audacity) would like to give you CVS write access. > Please can you send me your sourceforge user id? > > Initially please keep check ins to ones which you have high confidence > are the right way forward. If you have reservations about what the > change does, chances are those aspects need more discussion first. I'll > try to be responsive to questions etc, and I'll be keeping an eye on the > CVS check in logs. > > --James (on behalf of 'the technical council'). ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:36:00 +0000 From: James Crook <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Audacity-devel] Track group definition To: [hidden email] Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed I would regard the current way as being a P4 bug, rather than changing the manual only to have to change it back later when we do things right. If our code is designed right it should be just exactly as you say, a change in the iterators. If it's not, then it suggests we're being too special case in our coding, so it's a (mild) design smell and worth sorting out (as a P4). --James. Al Dimond wrote: > In an off-list discussion with Gale A. and Bill W., Bill mentioned that > the manual defines a track group as any positive number of wave tracks > followed by any positive number of label tracks. Gale said that this > is the definition agreed to by all developers when track groups and > linking were introduced. However, currently in the code this > definition is never used, as far as I can tell. It's always any number > of wave tracks followed by exactly one label track. Any further wave > tracks are on their own. > > For the most part, we could move to the definition stated in the manual > by changing TrackGroupIterator and TrackAndGroupIterator. I know of > at least a few other areas that would need attention: just about all > the Clear, Cut, and Paste functions would at least need a look, and > the Repeat effect would need minor changes. I'm sure I'm missing a few > things. On the other hand, we could leave the code how it is and > change the manual. I'd rather change the manual at this point, but, > you know, I'm just this guy that drops a lot of patches on your heads. > > Does anyone have thoughts or opinions on this? > > - Al ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:42:19 +0000 From: James Crook <[hidden email]> Subject: [Audacity-devel] GSoC 2010 planning To: [hidden email] Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed We need to review the outcomes of GSoC, and start making plans for 2010. Each year a lot of our energy goes into GSoC. It is important to get it right. Input from any audacity-devel contributors is welcome. --James. ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:56:48 -0300 From: Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Audacity-devel] bug: too many new project windows crashes Audacity To: [hidden email] Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Ed Musgrove wrote: > Precisely where in the function the problem occurs varies. If I single steps > slowly through the function I can get all the way to the end sometimes. If timing is related, then it can be a lock problem. wxWidgets requires precise work in this area. - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman / Arturo Busleiman @ 4:900/107 Independent Linux and Security Consultant - SANS - OISSG - OWASP http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/eng.html Mailing List Archives at http://archiver.mailfighter.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREKAAYFAkroviAACgkQAlpOsGhXcE1DUwCdGt9LqC2ZNk1bm6+AGahdZwUO f8YAnj45NjrwPTshJ928TRAl1uIyqXdm =LbtJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:21:29 -0700 From: "Ed Musgrove" <[hidden email]> Subject: [Audacity-devel] current compiling instructions on wiki To: <[hidden email]> Message-ID: <000001ca583e$86957980$93c06c80$@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On the Audacity Wiki page: http://wiki.audacityteam.org/index.php?title=Developing_On_Windows In part it says: Open the ..\wxWidgets-2.8.9\build\msw\wx_dll.dsw file in Visual Studio... In "Solution Explorer" on the left, expand the "dbgrid" project, then expand "Setup Headers". Open both "setup.h" files and ensure that: #define wxUSE_ODBC is set to "1" #define wxUSE_ACCESSIBILITY is set to "1". This could cause some confusion. The current wxWidgets version is 2.8.10. There is no longer a "dbgrid" project. Searching the entire code I found no mention of wxUSE_ODBC. Would it make any sense to upgrade the wxWidgets version? Since "Setup Headers" is available from any project, should we just say something like: In "Solution Explorer" on the left, expand any project then expand "Setup Headers". Should we completely remove the reference to wxUSE_ODBC? On the other hand, perhaps we should have two similar sets of instructions, one based on the now current "stable" wxWidgets version 2.6.4 for which the above instructions would be accurate and the other based on the concept of obtaining the most current source code. --Ed ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ audacity-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel End of audacity-devel Digest, Vol 42, Issue 120 *********************************************** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ audacity-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel |
||||||||||||||||
James Crook
|
John Martin Goddard wrote:
> Hello Dan, James, everyone, > > Regarding Google Summer of Code 2010, do you think my voice command/control application might fit in? > With all the caveats about whether Google run the program, and whether we take part, and whether we decide to again focus on bugfixes, and what mentors we have available.... a voice command plug-in for driving audacity would be an interesting proposal to read. However at the moment it sounds more like a research project than a feature that will be useful to large numbers of users - and it is that that would count heavily against it. The proposal would have to convince us that hands-free operation is important for audacity, or some such. It's an uphill sell. You're more likely to get a proposal accepted (by us) if it is for work on audacity itself that happens to benefit your project or a feature that enhances Audacity's ability to analyse audio. A voice-to-text-labels feature, or a 'find words in audio' even if only approximate would be a big plus for many people working with voice tracks.... --James. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ audacity-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel |
||||||||||||||||
|
James Crook
|
In reply to this post
by John Martin Goddard
John -
We've not deleted your wiki page on the voice command/control application; we just moved it to: http://wiki.audacityteam.org/index.php?title=Voice_Command_Module --James. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ audacity-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel |
||||||||||||||||
| Free Embeddable Forum Powered by Nabble | Help |
