3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names

[Bob Cave]

I am building FDO 3.3.2 on Windows.  I have run SetEnvironment.bat to initialize the environment, then launched Visual Studio 2005 from that command line session so that it will have the environment set up correctly.

While building XercesLib, I got errors saying that various header files could not be found:

xercesc/validators/schema/identity/XercesXPath.hpp
xercesc/validators/schema/identity/IC_Selector.hpp
xercesc/framework/psvi/XSComplexTypeDefinition.hpp

When I looked in the directories where those files were supposed to be, I found files with those names, but with a suffix of 0000644 (e.g., XercesXPath.hpp0000644).  Are these files supposed to be generated by the configuration process?  When I ran SetEnvironment.bat, I didn't get any error messages, but I did get messages saying I do not have several of the optional items.  Since those items are optional, I decided to continue without them.  Maybe that was not the best course of action.

Can I just rename these files, or do I have a configuration issue?

Thanks,

Bob

[Greg Boone]

Did you install ActivePerl? If so, which version?

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Bob Cave
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:52 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names


I am building FDO 3.3.2 on Windows.  I have run SetEnvironment.bat to
initialize the environment, then launched Visual Studio 2005 from that
command line session so that it will have the environment set up correctly.

While building XercesLib, I got errors saying that various header files
could not be found:

xercesc/validators/schema/identity/XercesXPath.hpp
xercesc/validators/schema/identity/IC_Selector.hpp
xercesc/framework/psvi/XSComplexTypeDefinition.hpp

When I looked in the directories where those files were supposed to be, I
found files with those names, but with a suffix of 0000644 (e.g.,
XercesXPath.hpp0000644).  Are these files supposed to be generated by the
configuration process?  When I ran SetEnvironment.bat, I didn't get any
error messages, but I did get messages saying I do not have several of the
optional items.  Since those items are optional, I decided to continue
without them.  Maybe that was not the best course of action.

Can I just rename these files, or do I have a configuration issue?

Thanks,

Bob



--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/3.3.2-Source-Files-with-Unexpected-Names-tp2321595p2321595.html
Sent from the FDO Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
fdo-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
_______________________________________________
fdo-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users

[Bob Cave]

I installed ActivePerl 5.10.0.1004.  

I found some other files with 000064 appended to their extensions in the apache/xml-xalan directory and in Unmanaged/Inc/Fdo.  I just renamed the files and continued the build and things seem to be OK so far.

Thanks,

Bob

Greg Boone wrote:

Did you install ActivePerl? If so, which version?

-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Bob Cave
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:52 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names


I am building FDO 3.3.2 on Windows.  I have run SetEnvironment.bat to
initialize the environment, then launched Visual Studio 2005 from that
command line session so that it will have the environment set up correctly.

While building XercesLib, I got errors saying that various header files
could not be found:

xercesc/validators/schema/identity/XercesXPath.hpp
xercesc/validators/schema/identity/IC_Selector.hpp
xercesc/framework/psvi/XSComplexTypeDefinition.hpp

[snip]

[Jason Birch]

That's bizarre...  It's almost like a truncated unix-based file
permission string got appended to the filenames.  They appear properly
in the tarball I looked in (http://download.osgeo.org/fdo/3.3.2/)  

What source are you using to build from?  I wonder if a broken SVN or
tar utility messed up the filenames for you...

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Cave
Sent: February-13-09 6:52 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names

When I looked in the directories where those files were supposed to be,
I
found files with those names, but with a suffix of 0000644 (e.g.,
XercesXPath.hpp0000644).

_______________________________________________
fdo-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users

[Traian Stanev]

Yeah, my bet also is that SVN barfed.

Traian



-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 11:31 AM
To: FDO Users Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names

That's bizarre...  It's almost like a truncated unix-based file
permission string got appended to the filenames.  They appear properly
in the tarball I looked in (http://download.osgeo.org/fdo/3.3.2/)

What source are you using to build from?  I wonder if a broken SVN or
tar utility messed up the filenames for you...

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Cave
Sent: February-13-09 6:52 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names

When I looked in the directories where those files were supposed to be,
I
found files with those names, but with a suffix of 0000644 (e.g.,
XercesXPath.hpp0000644).

_______________________________________________
fdo-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
_______________________________________________
fdo-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users

[Bob Cave]

I downloaded fdo-3.3.2.tar.gz yesterday, and unpacked it with WinZip 8.

Bob

Jason Birch wrote:

That's bizarre...  It's almost like a truncated unix-based file
permission string got appended to the filenames.  They appear properly
in the tarball I looked in (http://download.osgeo.org/fdo/3.3.2/)  

What source are you using to build from?  I wonder if a broken SVN or
tar utility messed up the filenames for you...

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Cave
Sent: February-13-09 6:52 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names

When I looked in the directories where those files were supposed to be,
I
found files with those names, but with a suffix of 0000644 (e.g.,
XercesXPath.hpp0000644).

_______________________________________________
fdo-users mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users

[Greg Boone]

Maybe winzip barfed unpacking it. I took a look at the tar.gz file. It seems ok.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Bob Cave
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 11:41 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: RE: [fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names


I downloaded fdo-3.3.2.tar.gz yesterday, and unpacked it with WinZip 8.

Bob


Jason Birch wrote:

>
> That's bizarre...  It's almost like a truncated unix-based file
> permission string got appended to the filenames.  They appear properly
> in the tarball I looked in (http://download.osgeo.org/fdo/3.3.2/)
>
> What source are you using to build from?  I wonder if a broken SVN or
> tar utility messed up the filenames for you...
>
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Cave
> Sent: February-13-09 6:52 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names
>
> When I looked in the directories where those files were supposed to be,
> I
> found files with those names, but with a suffix of 0000644 (e.g.,
> XercesXPath.hpp0000644).
>
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/3.3.2-Source-Files-with-Unexpected-Names-tp2321595p2322218.html
Sent from the FDO Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
fdo-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
_______________________________________________
fdo-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users

[Jason Birch]

Yeah, seems to work fine here with 7Zip (which I heartily recommend.
Free, fast, and has a 64bit edition).

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Boone
Subject: RE: [fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names

Maybe winzip barfed unpacking it. I took a look at the tar.gz file. It
seems ok.
_______________________________________________
fdo-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users

[Bob Cave]

Looks like WinZip is the culprit...thanks for your help.  I'll take a look at 7Zip.

Cheers,

Bob

Jason Birch wrote:

Yeah, seems to work fine here with 7Zip (which I heartily recommend.
Free, fast, and has a 64bit edition).

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Boone
Subject: RE: [fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names

Maybe winzip barfed unpacking it. I took a look at the tar.gz file. It
seems ok.
_______________________________________________
fdo-users mailing list
[e-mail]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users