2011 Process

23 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
1 2
Paul Ramsey

2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
So, to pick up a thread from April (!!!)
<http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/2009-April/000885.html>
the 2011 process need to be started up. My rough nose-count from that
time indicates that the balance of support was for the "modified
status quo" namely a continued annual international event, but with a
lighter overhead for the initial bidding process.
<http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Reboot_2011#Options_for_2011>.
Apparently the board has also discussed this and come down in favour
of the modified status quo.

I would like to add one more decision before we start 2011 planning,
and that is "regional rotation". Namely that, before we solicit
letters of interest, we clearly state that acceptable proposals from a
particular region will receive preference. Further, I would like to
propose that the rotation be set as Europe/North America/Other, with
2010 being Europe, 2011 being North America and 2012 being the next
other.

Can anyone violently opposed to the above please speak up? If I hear
no objections, I will attempt to write up a more detailed process page
on the wiki that reflects the state of affairs for the 2011 process.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Paul Ramsey

Re: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Frank Warmerdam <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Paul Ramsey wrote:
>>
>> So, to pick up a thread from April (!!!)
>> <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/2009-April/000885.html>
>> the 2011 process need to be started up. My rough nose-count from that
>> time indicates that the balance of support was for the "modified
>> status quo" namely a continued annual international event, but with a
>> lighter overhead for the initial bidding process.
>> <http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Reboot_2011#Options_for_2011>.
>> Apparently the board has also discussed this and come down in favour
>> of the modified status quo.
>>
>> I would like to add one more decision before we start 2011 planning,
>> and that is "regional rotation". Namely that, before we solicit
>> letters of interest, we clearly state that acceptable proposals from a
>> particular region will receive preference. Further, I would like to
>> propose that the rotation be set as Europe/North America/Other, with
>> 2010 being Europe, 2011 being North America and 2012 being the next
>> other.
>>
>> Can anyone violently opposed to the above please speak up? If I hear
>> no objections, I will attempt to write up a more detailed process page
>> on the wiki that reflects the state of affairs for the 2011 process.
>
> Paul,
>
> I am of supportive of the above approach.
>
> Best regards,


Thanks Frank.
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Jeroen Ticheler - GeoCat

Re: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Paul Ramsey
Excellent idea!
Jeroen

On Oct 28, 2009, at 11:26 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:

> So, to pick up a thread from April (!!!)
> <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/2009-April/000885.html 
> >
> the 2011 process need to be started up. My rough nose-count from that
> time indicates that the balance of support was for the "modified
> status quo" namely a continued annual international event, but with a
> lighter overhead for the initial bidding process.
> <http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Reboot_2011#Options_for_2011>.
> Apparently the board has also discussed this and come down in favour
> of the modified status quo.
>
> I would like to add one more decision before we start 2011 planning,
> and that is "regional rotation". Namely that, before we solicit
> letters of interest, we clearly state that acceptable proposals from a
> particular region will receive preference. Further, I would like to
> propose that the rotation be set as Europe/North America/Other, with
> 2010 being Europe, 2011 being North America and 2012 being the next
> other.
>
> Can anyone violently opposed to the above please speak up? If I hear
> no objections, I will attempt to write up a more detailed process page
> on the wiki that reflects the state of affairs for the 2011 process.
>
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>

_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo)

Re: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Paul Ramsey
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:26:10 -0700
Paul Ramsey <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I would like to add one more decision before we start 2011 planning,
> and that is "regional rotation". Namely that, before we solicit
> letters of interest, we clearly state that acceptable proposals from a
> particular region will receive preference. Further, I would like to
> propose that the rotation be set as Europe/North America/Other, with
> 2010 being Europe, 2011 being North America and 2012 being the next
> other.

This would certainly help alleviate several of the concerns
I've received when talking to past/potential bidders.

Tyler
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Claude Philipona

Re: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Paul Ramsey
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 23:26, Paul Ramsey <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I would like to add one more decision before we start 2011 planning,
> and that is "regional rotation". Namely that, before we solicit
> letters of interest, we clearly state that acceptable proposals from a
> particular region will receive preference. Further, I would like to
> propose that the rotation be set as Europe/North America/Other, with
> 2010 being Europe, 2011 being North America and 2012 being the next
> other.
I totally approve this principle, It worths at least to try. This is
something I have already proposed back in 2006 during the FOSS4G in
Lausanne. this kind of geographic rotation is widely used for
conferences in several other scientific communities.

Claude
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Rafael Medeiros Sperb

RES: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Folks,

Before we go ahead, I would like to know whether the ideia of having the
International FOSS4G every two years will be considered, as discussed in
Sidney? In this case, we would have international and regional meetings
alternating each other.

Warm regards,

Rafael

-----Mensagem original-----
De: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] Em nome de Claude
Philipona
Enviada em: Friday, October 30, 2009 4:44 AM
Para: conference
Assunto: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] 2011 Process

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 23:26, Paul Ramsey <[hidden email]>
wrote:
>
> I would like to add one more decision before we start 2011 planning,
> and that is "regional rotation". Namely that, before we solicit
> letters of interest, we clearly state that acceptable proposals from a
> particular region will receive preference. Further, I would like to
> propose that the rotation be set as Europe/North America/Other, with
> 2010 being Europe, 2011 being North America and 2012 being the next
> other.
I totally approve this principle, It worths at least to try. This is
something I have already proposed back in 2006 during the FOSS4G in
Lausanne. this kind of geographic rotation is widely used for
conferences in several other scientific communities.

Claude
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Venkatesh Raghavan-2

Re: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Claude Philipona
Claude Philipona wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 23:26, Paul Ramsey <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> I would like to add one more decision before we start 2011 planning,
>> and that is "regional rotation". Namely that, before we solicit
>> letters of interest, we clearly state that acceptable proposals from a
>> particular region will receive preference. Further, I would like to
>> propose that the rotation be set as Europe/North America/Other, with
>> 2010 being Europe, 2011 being North America and 2012 being the next
>> other.

Agree to the regional rotation but not the idea that half the
people planet on this planet are clumped as "others".

Perhaps we can consider Africa/Asia-Pacific/Europe/North America/South
Americas. I keep Balkan states, Central Asia, Middle East,
Russia in reserve as we have not seen participation
form that part of the world in past of the world at the past FOSS4G
conferences. Hope to see some of them folks in Barcelona.

FOSS4G will complete its "rotation" in Europe, North America,
Africa and Asia-Pacific, Europe by 2010.

The next in line would be North America/South Americas
considering the fact that we have done 2 stops in Europe before
reaching somewhere it 2011, we might as well stop again at
North America (if our friends in South Americas do not
strongly disagree).

That would leave us a choice of stopping again in Asia for 2012
or walking along to the South Americas. Personally, I
hope we could bring FOSS4G-2012 to a place that I would not
feel jet lagged nor require a travel visa.

And talking about travel visa, if we do decide to stop again
in North America in 2011, the organizing folks should take
care of this issue because half the people living on this
planet whom we now classify as "other" may find it
annoyingly cumbersome to get their travel documents.

Venka
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Paul Ramsey

Re: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Venka,

While I agree that I need a far less dismissive signifier than
"Other", I feel that a five-step rotation
Africa/Asia-Pacific/Europe/North America/South Americas puts far too
much space between the NA/Europe gatherings. The plain fact is that
the participation in the development communities is overwhelmingly
Europe/NA.

In addition, our attendance has been far better in EUR/NA. If
Barcelona makes 1000 attendees, which seems highly likely, the
combined Europe/NA attendance (1700) will almost double the combined
Asia/Africa attendance (1000) over this cycle.

Finally, in financial terms, the situation is even more unbalanced --
the combined $50K net of Asia/Africa is far less than the $120K net
from Victoria alone.

Anyhow, that is my personal opinion, but at the risk of having my ox
gored let me put another option on the table regards rotation and take
the temperature of the room:

Option 1: Europe/NA/Elsewhere
Option 2: Europe/Elsewhere/NA/Elsewhere

Yours,

Paul

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Venka <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Claude Philipona wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 23:26, Paul Ramsey <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to add one more decision before we start 2011 planning,
>>> and that is "regional rotation". Namely that, before we solicit
>>> letters of interest, we clearly state that acceptable proposals from a
>>> particular region will receive preference. Further, I would like to
>>> propose that the rotation be set as Europe/North America/Other, with
>>> 2010 being Europe, 2011 being North America and 2012 being the next
>>> other.
>
> Agree to the regional rotation but not the idea that half the
> people planet on this planet are clumped as "others".
>
> Perhaps we can consider Africa/Asia-Pacific/Europe/North America/South
> Americas. I keep Balkan states, Central Asia, Middle East,
> Russia in reserve as we have not seen participation
> form that part of the world in past of the world at the past FOSS4G
> conferences. Hope to see some of them folks in Barcelona.
>
> FOSS4G will complete its "rotation" in Europe, North America,
> Africa and Asia-Pacific, Europe by 2010.
>
> The next in line would be North America/South Americas
> considering the fact that we have done 2 stops in Europe before
> reaching somewhere it 2011, we might as well stop again at
> North America (if our friends in South Americas do not
> strongly disagree).
>
> That would leave us a choice of stopping again in Asia for 2012
> or walking along to the South Americas. Personally, I
> hope we could bring FOSS4G-2012 to a place that I would not
> feel jet lagged nor require a travel visa.
>
> And talking about travel visa, if we do decide to stop again
> in North America in 2011, the organizing folks should take
> care of this issue because half the people living on this
> planet whom we now classify as "other" may find it
> annoyingly cumbersome to get their travel documents.
>
> Venka
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Dave McIlhagga

Re: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Assuming the "Gathering of the Tribes" is the primary goal of the  
conference, Option 1 makes the most sense to me. In particular if this  
is seen as an important vehicle for generating operating revenue for  
the organization.

As much as the outreach in all corners of the globe is important -- I  
think a lot of this can be very effectively achieved through the local  
chapters.

Dave



On 2009-10-30, at 5:11 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:

> Venka,
>
> While I agree that I need a far less dismissive signifier than
> "Other", I feel that a five-step rotation
> Africa/Asia-Pacific/Europe/North America/South Americas puts far too
> much space between the NA/Europe gatherings. The plain fact is that
> the participation in the development communities is overwhelmingly
> Europe/NA.
>
> In addition, our attendance has been far better in EUR/NA. If
> Barcelona makes 1000 attendees, which seems highly likely, the
> combined Europe/NA attendance (1700) will almost double the combined
> Asia/Africa attendance (1000) over this cycle.
>
> Finally, in financial terms, the situation is even more unbalanced --
> the combined $50K net of Asia/Africa is far less than the $120K net
> from Victoria alone.
>
> Anyhow, that is my personal opinion, but at the risk of having my ox
> gored let me put another option on the table regards rotation and take
> the temperature of the room:
>
> Option 1: Europe/NA/Elsewhere
> Option 2: Europe/Elsewhere/NA/Elsewhere
>
> Yours,
>
> Paul
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Venka <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Claude Philipona wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 23:26, Paul Ramsey <[hidden email]
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would like to add one more decision before we start 2011  
>>>> planning,
>>>> and that is "regional rotation". Namely that, before we solicit
>>>> letters of interest, we clearly state that acceptable proposals  
>>>> from a
>>>> particular region will receive preference. Further, I would like to
>>>> propose that the rotation be set as Europe/North America/Other,  
>>>> with
>>>> 2010 being Europe, 2011 being North America and 2012 being the next
>>>> other.
>>
>> Agree to the regional rotation but not the idea that half the
>> people planet on this planet are clumped as "others".
>>
>> Perhaps we can consider Africa/Asia-Pacific/Europe/North America/
>> South
>> Americas. I keep Balkan states, Central Asia, Middle East,
>> Russia in reserve as we have not seen participation
>> form that part of the world in past of the world at the past FOSS4G
>> conferences. Hope to see some of them folks in Barcelona.
>>
>> FOSS4G will complete its "rotation" in Europe, North America,
>> Africa and Asia-Pacific, Europe by 2010.
>>
>> The next in line would be North America/South Americas
>> considering the fact that we have done 2 stops in Europe before
>> reaching somewhere it 2011, we might as well stop again at
>> North America (if our friends in South Americas do not
>> strongly disagree).
>>
>> That would leave us a choice of stopping again in Asia for 2012
>> or walking along to the South Americas. Personally, I
>> hope we could bring FOSS4G-2012 to a place that I would not
>> feel jet lagged nor require a travel visa.
>>
>> And talking about travel visa, if we do decide to stop again
>> in North America in 2011, the organizing folks should take
>> care of this issue because half the people living on this
>> planet whom we now classify as "other" may find it
>> annoyingly cumbersome to get their travel documents.
>>
>> Venka
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev

_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Peter Batty

Re: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
I agree with Dave and continue to support option 1.

I also support OSGeo continuing to be supportive of, and perhaps being more proactive about, additional regional conferences around the world. I think that having the regular cycle for the main global conference will help with this aim too.

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Dave McIlhagga <[hidden email]> wrote:
Assuming the "Gathering of the Tribes" is the primary goal of the conference, Option 1 makes the most sense to me. In particular if this is seen as an important vehicle for generating operating revenue for the organization.

As much as the outreach in all corners of the globe is important -- I think a lot of this can be very effectively achieved through the local chapters.

Dave




On 2009-10-30, at 5:11 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:

Venka,

While I agree that I need a far less dismissive signifier than
"Other", I feel that a five-step rotation
Africa/Asia-Pacific/Europe/North America/South Americas puts far too
much space between the NA/Europe gatherings. The plain fact is that
the participation in the development communities is overwhelmingly
Europe/NA.

In addition, our attendance has been far better in EUR/NA. If
Barcelona makes 1000 attendees, which seems highly likely, the
combined Europe/NA attendance (1700) will almost double the combined
Asia/Africa attendance (1000) over this cycle.

Finally, in financial terms, the situation is even more unbalanced --
the combined $50K net of Asia/Africa is far less than the $120K net
from Victoria alone.

Anyhow, that is my personal opinion, but at the risk of having my ox
gored let me put another option on the table regards rotation and take
the temperature of the room:

Option 1: Europe/NA/Elsewhere
Option 2: Europe/Elsewhere/NA/Elsewhere

Yours,

Paul

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Venka <[hidden email]> wrote:
Claude Philipona wrote:

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 23:26, Paul Ramsey <[hidden email]>
wrote:

I would like to add one more decision before we start 2011 planning,
and that is "regional rotation". Namely that, before we solicit
letters of interest, we clearly state that acceptable proposals from a
particular region will receive preference. Further, I would like to
propose that the rotation be set as Europe/North America/Other, with
2010 being Europe, 2011 being North America and 2012 being the next
other.

Agree to the regional rotation but not the idea that half the
people planet on this planet are clumped as "others".

Perhaps we can consider Africa/Asia-Pacific/Europe/North America/South
Americas. I keep Balkan states, Central Asia, Middle East,
Russia in reserve as we have not seen participation
form that part of the world in past of the world at the past FOSS4G
conferences. Hope to see some of them folks in Barcelona.

FOSS4G will complete its "rotation" in Europe, North America,
Africa and Asia-Pacific, Europe by 2010.

The next in line would be North America/South Americas
considering the fact that we have done 2 stops in Europe before
reaching somewhere it 2011, we might as well stop again at
North America (if our friends in South Americas do not
strongly disagree).

That would leave us a choice of stopping again in Asia for 2012
or walking along to the South Americas. Personally, I
hope we could bring FOSS4G-2012 to a place that I would not
feel jet lagged nor require a travel visa.

And talking about travel visa, if we do decide to stop again
in North America in 2011, the organizing folks should take
care of this issue because half the people living on this
planet whom we now classify as "other" may find it
annoyingly cumbersome to get their travel documents.

Venka
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev

_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev

_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev



--
Peter Batty - President, Spatial Networking
W: +1 303 339 0957  M: +1 720 346 3954
Blog: http://geothought.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Arnulf Christl (OSGeo)

Re: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Paul Ramsey
Hi,
having spoken with many who came and also those who could not come to AU I
very much support keeping FOSS4G an annual event. On rotation my
suggestion is to go for the US in 2011 (Denver region anyone?) and for
Asia in 2012 (Korea, Japan?). I see no need for a more complex rotation
system, lets see how it works out and where we are next year.

More thoughts below.

On Fri, October 30, 2009 22:11, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> Venka,
>
>
> While I agree that I need a far less dismissive signifier than
> "Other",
Yes, you should work on that.
> I feel that a five-step rotation
> Africa/Asia-Pacific/Europe/North America/South Americas puts far too
> much space between the NA/Europe gatherings. The plain fact is that the
> participation in the development communities is overwhelmingly Europe/NA.

...and will stay that way if we continue to ignore them. Interestingly,
Barcelona will be the first FOSS4G with potentially overwhelming
non-English speaking attendance (western CA, ZA, AU are all very English
spoken). We will also be in a country that already has two localized
conferences:
* http://www.sigte.udg.edu/jornadassiglibre/
* http://jornadas.gvsig.org/
Cool, huh?

It is high time that NA take care of it's own localized events. Then a
"continental rotation" for FOSS4G as suggested by Venka is a much more
viable option.

> In addition, our attendance has been far better in EUR/NA. If
> Barcelona makes 1000 attendees, which seems highly likely, the
> combined Europe/NA attendance (1700) will almost double the combined
> Asia/Africa attendance (1000) over this cycle.

I am not sure whether growing size for the global FOSS4G event really is
an argument. It could well be in our interest to keep the global rotating
FOSS4G at a manageable level because the strain on the LOC grows
considerably when bumping up attendee numbers. Lets wait and hear the
Barcelonians' story.

Instead we should start to consider helping the local events grow,
especially in developing areas like NA. One option is to tie them more
closely to existing, large events. Colocation will relieve us form
organizational burden and prevent event cannibalizing and fragmenting the
spatial community. Most normal people can unfortunately only go to one
three-day event in a year. Mingle with what's there and change from
within, we are big and established enough for that now.

> Finally, in financial terms, the situation is even more unbalanced --
> the combined $50K net of Asia/Africa is far less than the $120K net from
> Victoria alone.

Hopefully OSGeo will not have to rely on generating revenue from FOSS4G in
future but instead lower the price and  make the event more affordable for
the tribe. We should make a profit in Barcelona - we need it - and again
in the US. 2012 is scheduled for apocalypse anyway so lets wait and see
whether someone comes up with the FOSS ark.

Arnulf.

> Anyhow, that is my personal opinion, but at the risk of having my ox
> gored let me put another option on the table regards rotation and take the
> temperature of the room:
>
> Option 1: Europe/NA/Elsewhere
> Option 2: Europe/Elsewhere/NA/Elsewhere
>
>
> Yours,
>
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Venka <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Claude Philipona wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 23:26, Paul Ramsey
>>> <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would like to add one more decision before we start 2011
>>>> planning, and that is "regional rotation". Namely that, before we
>>>> solicit letters of interest, we clearly state that acceptable
>>>> proposals from a particular region will receive preference. Further,
>>>> I would like to
>>>> propose that the rotation be set as Europe/North America/Other, with
>>>>  2010 being Europe, 2011 being North America and 2012 being the
>>>> next other.
>>
>> Agree to the regional rotation but not the idea that half the
>> people planet on this planet are clumped as "others".
>>
>> Perhaps we can consider Africa/Asia-Pacific/Europe/North America/South
>> Americas. I keep Balkan states, Central Asia, Middle East,
>> Russia in reserve as we have not seen participation
>> form that part of the world in past of the world at the past FOSS4G
>> conferences. Hope to see some of them folks in Barcelona.
>>
>> FOSS4G will complete its "rotation" in Europe, North America,
>> Africa and Asia-Pacific, Europe by 2010.
>>
>>
>> The next in line would be North America/South Americas
>> considering the fact that we have done 2 stops in Europe before reaching
>> somewhere it 2011, we might as well stop again at North America (if our
>> friends in South Americas do not strongly disagree).
>>
>> That would leave us a choice of stopping again in Asia for 2012
>> or walking along to the South Americas. Personally, I hope we could bring
>> FOSS4G-2012 to a place that I would not
>> feel jet lagged nor require a travel visa.
>>
>> And talking about travel visa, if we do decide to stop again
>> in North America in 2011, the organizing folks should take care of this
>> issue because half the people living on this planet whom we now classify
>> as "other" may find it annoyingly cumbersome to get their travel
>> documents.
>>
>> Venka
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>


--
Arnulf Christl
http://www.wheregroup.com

_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Arnulf Christl (OSGeo)

Re: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Venkatesh Raghavan-2
[...]

> And talking about travel visa, if we do decide to stop again
> in North America in 2011, the organizing folks should take care of this
> issue because half the people living on this planet whom we now classify
> as "other" may find it annoyingly cumbersome to get their travel
> documents.
>
> Venka

Thanks for bringing this up again, coming from Germany I constantly forget
about this type of problem. I currently do not know what it takes but I am
pretty sure that being a US-based organization OSGeo can actually do
something about this, at least for the US some kind of invitation letter
could help. We should make this a mandatory issue for all conferences.

Regards,


_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Arnulf Christl (OSGeo)

Re: RES: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Rafael Medeiros Sperb

On Fri, October 30, 2009 11:49, Rafael Medeiros Sperb wrote:

> Folks,
>
>
> Before we go ahead, I would like to know whether the ideia of having the
> International FOSS4G every two years will be considered, as discussed in
> Sidney? In this case, we would have international and regional meetings
> alternating each other.
>
> Warm regards,
>
>
> Rafael

Rafael,
from my tiny perspective Brazil is a continent of its own and should
therefore also have at least one annually recurring event of its own.
During bootstrapping this is a heavy load on those starting it up but the
second or third event can - if you manage accordingly - run on its own.

But it is very important to have you here on the conference committee to
add a Brazilian perspective. Ideally some folks from Spanish speaking SA
will also eventually join, for them it definitely makes sense to have a
local conference in their language. I guess Barcelona will be the right
time to bootstrap them, if they are not already under way, Lorenzo is very
active.

Can you argument in favor of having the international FOSS4G in Brazil
apart form it being a great venue and probably offering the most lively
night life ever? Would it help the cause of OSGeo in Brazil, spread word,
mission and so on? This might sound like a rhetoric question but I guess
we should know because it will give us the option to adjust a localized
FOSS4G event to address these questions.

Regards,
Arnulf.

> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] Em nome de Claude
> Philipona
> Enviada em: Friday, October 30, 2009 4:44 AM
> Para: conference
> Assunto: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] 2011 Process
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 23:26, Paul Ramsey <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I would like to add one more decision before we start 2011 planning,
>> and that is "regional rotation". Namely that, before we solicit letters
>> of interest, we clearly state that acceptable proposals from a
>> particular region will receive preference. Further, I would like to
>> propose that the rotation be set as Europe/North America/Other, with
>> 2010 being Europe, 2011 being North America and 2012 being the next
>> other.
> I totally approve this principle, It worths at least to try. This is
> something I have already proposed back in 2006 during the FOSS4G in
> Lausanne. this kind of geographic rotation is widely used for
> conferences in several other scientific communities.
>
> Claude
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>


--
Arnulf Christl
http://www.wheregroup.com

_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Anton Patrushev-2

Re: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Arnulf Christl (OSGeo)
Hi Venka, Arnulf,

Let me put my 2 cents to this discussion.
As a Russian citizen, I need a visa to each and every country I visit.
Well, probably except North Korea and Venezuela :)
Here I want to thank all organizers of all conferences I attended
before, because they always support us, poor citizens of Evil Axis
countries, with invitation letters and suggestions.

But our fellow organizers can't really help in case if country has
certain quota for visas (like US), and if my application is for
example 1001st, US Consul just has to refuse it.


Anton.


On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Arnulf Christl
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> [...]
>
>> And talking about travel visa, if we do decide to stop again
>> in North America in 2011, the organizing folks should take care of this
>> issue because half the people living on this planet whom we now classify
>> as "other" may find it annoyingly cumbersome to get their travel
>> documents.
>>
>> Venka
>
> Thanks for bringing this up again, coming from Germany I constantly forget
> about this type of problem. I currently do not know what it takes but I am
> pretty sure that being a US-based organization OSGeo can actually do
> something about this, at least for the US some kind of invitation letter
> could help. We should make this a mandatory issue for all conferences.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Venkatesh Raghavan-2

Re: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Arnulf Christl (OSGeo)
Arnulf Christl wrote:
> Hi, having spoken with many who came and also those who could not
> come to AU I very much support keeping FOSS4G an annual event. On
> rotation my suggestion is to go for the US in 2011 (Denver region
> anyone?) and for Asia in 2012 (Korea, Japan?).

2012 maybe Korea+Japan just like the world Cup football
(soccer) game 10 year ago, maybe. Convention Center in
Pusan (Korea) and Code Sprint in Fukuoka (Japan).

Dreaming maybe.

Best Regards

Venka
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Jorge Sanz (OSGeo)

Re: RES: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Arnulf Christl (OSGeo)
2009/11/2 Arnulf Christl <[hidden email]>:

>
> On Fri, October 30, 2009 11:49, Rafael Medeiros Sperb wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>>
>> Before we go ahead, I would like to know whether the ideia of having the
>> International FOSS4G every two years will be considered, as discussed in
>> Sidney? In this case, we would have international and regional meetings
>> alternating each other.
>>
>> Warm regards,
>>
>>
>> Rafael
>
> Rafael,
> from my tiny perspective Brazil is a continent of its own and should
> therefore also have at least one annually recurring event of its own.
> During bootstrapping this is a heavy load on those starting it up but the
> second or third event can - if you manage accordingly - run on its own.
>

Well, maybe I'm missing something in that thread but Brazil has its
FOSS4G event at http://geolivre.com/ this month on Brasilia.

But I have no idea if they are connected with OSGeo or OSGeo-Brazil in any way

> But it is very important to have you here on the conference committee to
> add a Brazilian perspective. Ideally some folks from Spanish speaking SA
> will also eventually join, for them it definitely makes sense to have a
> local conference in their language. I guess Barcelona will be the right
> time to bootstrap them, if they are not already under way, Lorenzo is very
> active.
>
> Can you argument in favor of having the international FOSS4G in Brazil
> apart form it being a great venue and probably offering the most lively
> night life ever? Would it help the cause of OSGeo in Brazil, spread word,
> mission and so on? This might sound like a rhetoric question but I guess
> we should know because it will give us the option to adjust a localized
> FOSS4G event to address these questions.
>
> Regards,
> Arnulf.
>

On the other hand, this year was the first gvSIG conference for
Latinamerican and Caribe, with a lot enthusiasm and success AFAIK.
Next year will be at Venezuela and probably next on Brazil. So the
thinks in SA are moving and I see a growing "market" there for OSGeo
and free geosoftware.

Best regards
--
Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas
Ingeniero en Geodesia y Cartografía
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jorge_Sanz
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Lorenzo Becchi - nabble

Re: RES: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
I agree with Jorge, South America is moving already with or without us.
IMO there's not yet a good SA network to justify a big conference.
Our hope as FOSS4G 2010 is that Barcelona can be the right place to meet and expand this network.

lorenzo


On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas <[hidden email]> wrote:
2009/11/2 Arnulf Christl <[hidden email]>:
>
> On Fri, October 30, 2009 11:49, Rafael Medeiros Sperb wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>>
>> Before we go ahead, I would like to know whether the ideia of having the
>> International FOSS4G every two years will be considered, as discussed in
>> Sidney? In this case, we would have international and regional meetings
>> alternating each other.
>>
>> Warm regards,
>>
>>
>> Rafael
>
> Rafael,
> from my tiny perspective Brazil is a continent of its own and should
> therefore also have at least one annually recurring event of its own.
> During bootstrapping this is a heavy load on those starting it up but the
> second or third event can - if you manage accordingly - run on its own.
>

Well, maybe I'm missing something in that thread but Brazil has its
FOSS4G event at http://geolivre.com/ this month on Brasilia.

But I have no idea if they are connected with OSGeo or OSGeo-Brazil in any way

> But it is very important to have you here on the conference committee to
> add a Brazilian perspective. Ideally some folks from Spanish speaking SA
> will also eventually join, for them it definitely makes sense to have a
> local conference in their language. I guess Barcelona will be the right
> time to bootstrap them, if they are not already under way, Lorenzo is very
> active.
>
> Can you argument in favor of having the international FOSS4G in Brazil
> apart form it being a great venue and probably offering the most lively
> night life ever? Would it help the cause of OSGeo in Brazil, spread word,
> mission and so on? This might sound like a rhetoric question but I guess
> we should know because it will give us the option to adjust a localized
> FOSS4G event to address these questions.
>
> Regards,
> Arnulf.
>

On the other hand, this year was the first gvSIG conference for
Latinamerican and Caribe, with a lot enthusiasm and success AFAIK.
Next year will be at Venezuela and probably next on Brazil. So the
thinks in SA are moving and I see a growing "market" there for OSGeo
and free geosoftware.

Best regards
--
Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas
Ingeniero en Geodesia y Cartografía
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jorge_Sanz
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev



_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Arnulf Christl (OSGeo)

Re: RES: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Jorge Sanz (OSGeo)

On Mon, November 2, 2009 16:26, Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas wrote:

> 2009/11/2 Arnulf Christl <[hidden email]>:
>
>>
>> On Fri, October 30, 2009 11:49, Rafael Medeiros Sperb wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Before we go ahead, I would like to know whether the ideia of having
>>> the International FOSS4G every two years will be considered, as
>>> discussed in Sidney? In this case, we would have international and
>>> regional meetings alternating each other.
>>>
>>> Warm regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rafael
>>>
>>
>> Rafael,
>> from my tiny perspective Brazil is a continent of its own and should
>> therefore also have at least one annually recurring event of its own.
>> During bootstrapping this is a heavy load on those starting it up but
>> the second or third event can - if you manage accordingly - run on its
>> own.
>>
>
> Well, maybe I'm missing something in that thread but Brazil has its
> FOSS4G event at http://geolivre.com/ this month on Brasilia.

Brazil has events since 2004, in 2005 they invited Daniel Morissette and
me to the II Encontro Nacional de Usarios Mapserver (I still have the
shirt). So yes, they are very active. Which is why I asked whether an
international FOSS4G event is needed to get things seed started at all.
Potentially due to community burn out the last version of the event was a
little less successful which is why I mentioned that distributing
responsibility on more shoulders helps shift the burden a bit.

> But I have no idea if they are connected with OSGeo or OSGeo-Brazil in
> any way

Yes and no. Geolivre is more a company driven event and OSGeo might appear
as an invited guest. As in many regions there seem to be somewhat
competing local communities with sometimes differing interests. I can tell
stories from Germany, others from Canada or Italy. Same s... everywhere.
But diversity is good. :-)

>> But it is very important to have you here on the conference committee
>> to add a Brazilian perspective. Ideally some folks from Spanish speaking
>> SA
>> will also eventually join, for them it definitely makes sense to have a
>> local conference in their language. I guess Barcelona will be the right
>>  time to bootstrap them, if they are not already under way, Lorenzo is
>> very active.
>>
>> Can you argument in favor of having the international FOSS4G in Brazil
>> apart form it being a great venue and probably offering the most lively
>> night life ever? Would it help the cause of OSGeo in Brazil, spread
>> word, mission and so on? This might sound like a rhetoric question but I
>> guess we should know because it will give us the option to adjust a
>> localized FOSS4G event to address these questions.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Arnulf.
>>
>>
>
> On the other hand, this year was the first gvSIG conference for
> Latinamerican and Caribe, with a lot enthusiasm and success AFAIK.
> Next year will be at Venezuela and probably next on Brazil. So the
> thinks in SA are moving and I see a growing "market" there for OSGeo and
> free geosoftware.
>
> Best regards
> --
> Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas
> Ingeniero en Geodesia y Cartografía
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jorge_Sanz

That was also my impression. I am unsure whether Hispano Hablante SA is
prepared to go for a kind of "continental" event. I think it would help to
have a localized seed FOSS4G somewhere happen before the global tribe
strikes.

But now that we are talking - what are your plans for gvSIG anyway? Are
you planning to keep it going as a complementary event to FOSS4G and all
the local events, like the project's conference?

Regards,
Arnulf.


_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Jorge Sanz (OSGeo)

Re: RES: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
2009/11/3 Arnulf Christl (WhereGroup) <[hidden email]>:

>
> On Mon, November 2, 2009 16:26, Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas wrote:
>> 2009/11/2 Arnulf Christl <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, October 30, 2009 11:49, Rafael Medeiros Sperb wrote:
>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Before we go ahead, I would like to know whether the ideia of having
>>>> the International FOSS4G every two years will be considered, as
>>>> discussed in Sidney? In this case, we would have international and
>>>> regional meetings alternating each other.
>>>>
>>>> Warm regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rafael
>>>>
>>>
>>> Rafael,
>>> from my tiny perspective Brazil is a continent of its own and should
>>> therefore also have at least one annually recurring event of its own.
>>> During bootstrapping this is a heavy load on those starting it up but
>>> the second or third event can - if you manage accordingly - run on its
>>> own.
>>>
>>
>> Well, maybe I'm missing something in that thread but Brazil has its
>> FOSS4G event at http://geolivre.com/ this month on Brasilia.
>
> Brazil has events since 2004, in 2005 they invited Daniel Morissette and
> me to the II Encontro Nacional de Usarios Mapserver (I still have the
> shirt). So yes, they are very active. Which is why I asked whether an
> international FOSS4G event is needed to get things seed started at all.
> Potentially due to community burn out the last version of the event was a
> little less successful which is why I mentioned that distributing
> responsibility on more shoulders helps shift the burden a bit.
>
>> But I have no idea if they are connected with OSGeo or OSGeo-Brazil in
>> any way
>
> Yes and no. Geolivre is more a company driven event and OSGeo might appear
> as an invited guest. As in many regions there seem to be somewhat
> competing local communities with sometimes differing interests. I can tell
> stories from Germany, others from Canada or Italy. Same s... everywhere.
> But diversity is good. :-)
>
>>> But it is very important to have you here on the conference committee
>>> to add a Brazilian perspective. Ideally some folks from Spanish speaking
>>> SA
>>> will also eventually join, for them it definitely makes sense to have a
>>> local conference in their language. I guess Barcelona will be the right
>>>  time to bootstrap them, if they are not already under way, Lorenzo is
>>> very active.
>>>
>>> Can you argument in favor of having the international FOSS4G in Brazil
>>> apart form it being a great venue and probably offering the most lively
>>> night life ever? Would it help the cause of OSGeo in Brazil, spread
>>> word, mission and so on? This might sound like a rhetoric question but I
>>> guess we should know because it will give us the option to adjust a
>>> localized FOSS4G event to address these questions.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Arnulf.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> On the other hand, this year was the first gvSIG conference for
>> Latinamerican and Caribe, with a lot enthusiasm and success AFAIK.
>> Next year will be at Venezuela and probably next on Brazil. So the
>> thinks in SA are moving and I see a growing "market" there for OSGeo and
>> free geosoftware.
>>
>> Best regards
>> --
>> Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas
>> Ingeniero en Geodesia y Cartografía
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jorge_Sanz
>
> That was also my impression. I am unsure whether Hispano Hablante SA is
> prepared to go for a kind of "continental" event. I think it would help to
> have a localized seed FOSS4G somewhere happen before the global tribe
> strikes.
>

OSGeo-ES is not very present at this time in SA, there are interesting
people like the GeoTUX group at Colombia and many many people
supporting free software at Venezuela, for example. But the "OSGeo"
brand is not really present there, but well, it's my feeling.

Indeed, enforce the presence of OSGeo at SA is one of the main goals
of OSGeo-ES, and for the first time OSGeo was presented at SA* in
Buenos Aires at the gvSIG conf by Valenty González from Venezuela.

* I would not place Cuba at SA

> But now that we are talking - what are your plans for gvSIG anyway? Are
> you planning to keep it going as a complementary event to FOSS4G and all
> the local events, like the project's conference?
>

The gvSIG latinamerican conf is like other conferences that active
users have been promoting. In Europe we have confs at Italy (Trieste),
at Germany (Munich) and next year seems that will be another one at
GB. The real difference is maybe the geographic scale.

So yes, I see it as a complementary conference for a future FOSS4G
conf. In Spain, as you know we have the Girona meeting and the gvSIG
one and both are quite succesful (you'll enjoy at Girona, believe me).

Regards
--
Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas
Ingeniero en Geodesia y Cartografía
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jorge_Sanz
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
Rafael Medeiros Sperb

RES: RES: 2011 Process

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Jorge Sanz (OSGeo)
Folks,

I want to make clear that GeoLivre is not a OSGeo-Br meeting, but rather a company's showcase. Therefore, is more oriented to display successful applications that OpenGeo has developed for its clients, especially the government.

In Brazil, we have started as early as 2002 our brazilian meetings, firstly as mapserver user's meetings (ENUM), and for the last 2 years, as a shy OSGeo-Br get together at the latinoware conference. But nothing compared with what we had in the past. OSGeo-Br came from those mapserver meetings. I believe we are still trying to move from it to OSGeo umbrella. It has been a little messy to this moment.

I do agree with Jorge that LA has a potential on its own. But thus far, there has been little movement to integrated portuguese and Spanish speaking countries. This would be the wise movement for next year.

Warm regards,

Rafael

-----Mensagem original-----
De: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] Em nome de Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas
Enviada em: Monday, November 02, 2009 12:26 PM
Para: [hidden email]
Cc: conference
Assunto: Re: RES: [OSGeo-Conf] 2011 Process

2009/11/2 Arnulf Christl <[hidden email]>:

>
> On Fri, October 30, 2009 11:49, Rafael Medeiros Sperb wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>>
>> Before we go ahead, I would like to know whether the ideia of having the
>> International FOSS4G every two years will be considered, as discussed in
>> Sidney? In this case, we would have international and regional meetings
>> alternating each other.
>>
>> Warm regards,
>>
>>
>> Rafael
>
> Rafael,
> from my tiny perspective Brazil is a continent of its own and should
> therefore also have at least one annually recurring event of its own.
> During bootstrapping this is a heavy load on those starting it up but the
> second or third event can - if you manage accordingly - run on its own.
>

Well, maybe I'm missing something in that thread but Brazil has its
FOSS4G event at http://geolivre.com/ this month on Brasilia.

But I have no idea if they are connected with OSGeo or OSGeo-Brazil in any way

> But it is very important to have you here on the conference committee to
> add a Brazilian perspective. Ideally some folks from Spanish speaking SA
> will also eventually join, for them it definitely makes sense to have a
> local conference in their language. I guess Barcelona will be the right
> time to bootstrap them, if they are not already under way, Lorenzo is very
> active.
>
> Can you argument in favor of having the international FOSS4G in Brazil
> apart form it being a great venue and probably offering the most lively
> night life ever? Would it help the cause of OSGeo in Brazil, spread word,
> mission and so on? This might sound like a rhetoric question but I guess
> we should know because it will give us the option to adjust a localized
> FOSS4G event to address these questions.
>
> Regards,
> Arnulf.
>

On the other hand, this year was the first gvSIG conference for
Latinamerican and Caribe, with a lot enthusiasm and success AFAIK.
Next year will be at Venezuela and probably next on Brazil. So the
thinks in SA are moving and I see a growing "market" there for OSGeo
and free geosoftware.

Best regards
--
Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas
Ingeniero en Geodesia y Cartografía
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jorge_Sanz
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
1 2