18 Things I Wish Were True About Plone

122 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
1 ... 4 5 6 7
Matthew Wilkes

Re: 18 Things I Wish Were True About Plone

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink

On Heisei 0020-02-10, at 221725GMT, Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> I don't agree. Plone is a CMS: it is great at managing contentish
> things. It is extensible which allows you to make it do some other
> things as well, but in the end it is a CMS. It should not be a  
> computing
> fabric, it should not do unified communications and it is not a web
> platform. The fact that Gartner lists something as important does not
> mean that Plone has to do that. Social networking falls firmly in that
> category in my opinion.

I agree, that said I've done lots of plone sites with social  
networking components and will do again in future.  It's the vogue at  
the moment, simple sites want to allow user-generated content to  
appear and for those users to contact each other.  It's important that  
we don't build ourselves into a corner so these things aren't possible  
but it's not something for core.

Matt

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Plone-developers mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers
Christian Scholz-2

Re: 18 Things I Wish Were True About Plone

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Hi!

Matthew Wilkes wrote:

> On Heisei 0020-02-10, at 221725GMT, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
>> I don't agree. Plone is a CMS: it is great at managing contentish
>> things. It is extensible which allows you to make it do some other
>> things as well, but in the end it is a CMS. It should not be a  
>> computing
>> fabric, it should not do unified communications and it is not a web
>> platform. The fact that Gartner lists something as important does not
>> mean that Plone has to do that. Social networking falls firmly in that
>> category in my opinion.
>
> I agree, that said I've done lots of plone sites with social  
> networking components and will do again in future.  It's the vogue at  
> the moment, simple sites want to allow user-generated content to  
> appear and for those users to contact each other.  It's important that  
> we don't build ourselves into a corner so these things aren't possible  
> but it's not something for core.

Heh, vogue sounds as if it's going over again soon ;-)
And I am actually not talking about core or non-core, I mean Plone in
general and I count the add-on products in.

Regarding the core though it would be helpful if the user story would be
better, e.g. having users as objects would really help here IMHO (or is
it possible to use e.g. plone.relations with the users we have right now).
IMHO this is important so that there is a common building ground for
such things. I am not sure though which issues regarding PAS plugins
this brings with it.

-- Christian


--
Christian Scholz                         video blog: http://comlounge.tv
COM.lounge                                   blog: http://mrtopf.de/blog
Luetticher Strasse 10                                    Skype: HerrTopf
52064 Aachen                              Homepage: http://comlounge.net
Tel: +49 241 400 730 0                           E-Mail [hidden email]
Fax: +49 241 979 00 850                               IRC: MrTopf, Tao_T

connect with me: http://mrtopf.de/connect


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Plone-developers mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers
1 ... 4 5 6 7