[Fwd: Re: contracts of FILE promise too much ...]

1 Message Forum Options Options
Embed this topic
Permalink
Helmut Brandl
[Fwd: Re: contracts of FILE promise too much ...]
Reply Threaded MoreMore options
Print post
Permalink
Same old error, I have sent the post directly to Peter instead to the
list. Sorry.

Helmut
The Eiffel Compiler http://tecomp.sourceforge.net

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [freeelks-devel] contracts of FILE promise too much ...
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:50:12 -0500
From: Helmut Brandl <helmut.brandl@...>
To: Peter Gummer <p-gummer@...>
References: <48F150E6.2090902@...>
<010e01c92c1b$dd4f2320$97ed6960$@com> <48F17977.70501@...>



Peter Gummer wrote:

> Emmanuel Stapf [ES] wrote:
>  
>> We are not changing them because it will break so much code. The idea is that we
>> will eventually create a new hierarchy of IO_MEDIUM like classes, but because gobo
>> has introduced the proper classes the incentive is not very high.
>>  
>>    
>
>
> This appears to be a case where it makes sense for a Gobo class to move
> into FreeELKS. I'm not sure how the Gobo developers would feel about
> that, but if the Gobo classes are better then it seems right that they
> should be standard.
>  
Hello Peter,

which class of Gobo do you think could replace FILE?

Helmut

The Eiffel Compiler http://tecomp.sourceforge.net



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
freeelks-devel mailing list
freeelks-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freeelks-devel